week 3 Flashcards
why did conditions for disabled change post WW2
- ppl hated nazi germany’s extermination
- parents became advocates
- post-war prosperity inc public resources like healthcare
president kennedy
made presidential commission to make national strategy for those w developmental disabilities
improvments to institutional care
- inc medications and treatments
- inc humanization, dec abuse…teach functional skills
- prev focus on non-functioning living skills i.e. writing - hired professional staff
- began separating by disability type w formal assessment and evals to inc QOL
- disabled can keep personal belongings
- disabled are NOT dangerous, unlock doors, remove bars
path of deinstitutionalization in ontario
1964: fed/prov conference encouraged research and needs assessment
1967: national institute on mental R was funded…conducted research and give reources to developmentally disabled
1969: bengt nirje proposes normalization, creating “normal” environ, routine, life opps
1971: ontario incorporates normalization into policy
- start institute closures
1972: book abt normalization, says to dec stereotypes
1973: welch report recommends inc services…dec hospitals and inc community care
1974: direction for community living is firmly established
1989: bill 82/education act passed, all kids w disability are educated in public school
1983: 5 yr plan to inc institute closures
2009: last institute closed, end of 130yr era
arguments AGAINST deinstitutionalization
community not yet prepared
few job opps/recreational opps
poor tranport, restricted service access
inadequate policies to ensure quality programs
benefits of deinstitutionalization
live at home, not hidden
teach real world and social skills
meaningful jobs and play
comparing community vs institutes
living situation: inc sleep, safety, feeling of having a choice
choice and control: choice of routine, staff, meals, privacy
dignity, respect, and access to personal care inc
- more helpful in community, denied care in institute
community integration and inclusion: inc inclusion, inc friends/fam and leisure
- poor transport
- some activities restricted
inclusion
regardless of ability, ppl participate in same environ w support and attention
all individuals belong and are valued
segregation
pre-1950s, ppl w disabilities segregated via institutions
integration
1950s-60s, since racial segregation bad, for disabled is bad
least restrictive environments
1970s, new rights to employment and education
individuals eductaed alongside peers
mainstreaming
disabled enter workplace and educate in mainstream/public settings
sometimes in places that can’t support needs
full inclusion
1980s-90s focus on this, educate tgt w supports
1990s-present: not fully realized bcs limited resources
OHRC
ontario human rights code: first legislation recognizing consequences of discriminatin
to prevent and eliminate discrimination of employment
- via marital status, race, orientation, etc
requires equal treatment in housing, services, etc
ontarians with disabilities act
in 2001
to improve opportunities and to ID, remove, and prevent barriers to participation