Week 23 Flashcards
Feminism
-Feminism and patriarchy- from analysis to political change
-“First Wave”: The Women’s Suffrage movement
-“Second Wave”
Simone DeBeauvoir, The Second Sex (1949)
The constructed nature of the “feminine” (One is not born a woman)
-Woman as “Other”
-Betty Friedan, The Feminine Mystique (1963)
“Images of Women” Criticism
Sociological approach
-Rosen, Popcorn Venus (1973)
-Haskell, From Reverence to Rape (1974)
-Female stereotypes in the cinema
-marriage as fulfillment of woman’s desire
-Hollywood vs. “feminine self-determination”
Challenges to the “Images” Approach
-Naive and limited approach
-Rests on questionable assumption:
-“False” representations will be replaced by “true” ones owing to intervention of enlightened few.
-Descriptive approach only
-Fails to account for how patriarchal ideology is produced or sustained
Cinema-Specific Approaches
-Influence of psychoanalytic theory
-“Scopophilia” pleasure in looking
-Film viewer as licensed voyeur
Laura Mulvey , “Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema”
-Feminist application of psychoanalytic theory
-Cinema and the male psyche
-the male gaze
-Active/ male vs. passive/ female
-Woman connotes “to be looked at ness”
-“Narcissistic” & “fetishistic” scopophilia.
Narcissistic Scopophilia
-Male identification with a masculine “ego ideal”
-Idealized image of ourselves
-Human face/ body similar to our own, but more perfect.
Fetishistic Scopophilia
-Involves use of another person as erotic object
-Women on screen= objects of the gaze.
-Play “traditional exhibitionistic role”
-Occasional suspension of narrative for erotic spectacle.
Male Erotic Pleasure vs. Castration Anxiety
-Freudian “castration anxiety”
-Countered in several ways:
-Eroticizing gaze (shared by male viewer and male characters on screen), gives viewers feeling of power, control
-Women on screen often dominated, disempowered, humiliated
-Extreme idealization of women on screen
-Ultra-perfection disavows “lack”
Some Problems with Mulvey’s Argument
-Exclusively centred on the straight male viewer
-Female gaze?
-Heterosexist
-Gay/ lesbian/ queer spectators?
-no cross-gendered identification possible?
-Still, a very influential essay.