Week 2: Evaluating Service User Involvement Flashcards

1
Q

Direct, often aggressive, methods used to challenge or oppose systems or institutions.

Examples:
Sit ins
Picketing
Boycott

A

Confrontational Approaches

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

The belief that individuals should be empowered to make informed choices as consumers.

Examples:
Focus Groups
Consumer Advocacy Groups
Informed Consent

A

Consumerism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

A philosophical approach that emphasizes practical consequences over abstract theories.

Examples:
Cost Benefit Analysis
Trial and Error
Problem-Solving

A

Pragmatism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Beliefs or doctrines that advocate for fundamental changes to society.

Examples:
Feminism
Environmentalism
Anarchism

A

Radical Ideology

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

The active participation of individuals who receive mental health services in decision-making and research processes.

A

Service User Involvement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Is a research network focused on mental health. It’s a platform that brings together researchers, clinicians, service users, and policymakers to collaborate on mental health research projects.

A

Mental Health Research Network (MHRN)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the benefits of patient involvement in research?

A

1) Recruitment Success = 90%
2) Funding bodies (i.e., National Institute for Healthcare Research)
3) Democracy and empowerment of service users
4) Identification + prioritization of relevant research topics
5) Eliciting richer data (participants share personal and stigmatizing information)
6) Generation of representative and robust findings
7) Evidence that user involvement increases the likelihood of a study’s success

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

3 Different Levels of User Involvement

A

1) Consultation: researcher-initiated
2) Collaboration: jointly initiated
3) User Control: user-initiated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

The most superficial or short-term level of involvement, where users are asked for their opinions or feedback but have limited influence over decision-making.

A

Consultation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

A more active level of involvement where users work together with researchers as equal partners in all stages of the research process.

A

Collaboration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

The highest level of involvement where users initiate and conduct their own research, with minimal or no involvement from researchers.

A

User-Control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Is a national advisory group that supports public involvement in health and social care research.

A

INVOLVE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Peter Beresford highlighted a concern in service user involvement. What was it?

A

“recent interest in service user knowledge is part of broader pressure from funding bodies to increase user involvement”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What solutions did Peter Beresford recommend to challenge the imbalance/inequalities?

A

1) Ongoing review and evaluation
2) Commitment to and training in inequality of opportunities
3) Specific strategies for involving excluded groups
4) Clarity on the issue of representation
5) Evaluation of participation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Regularly assessing organizational policies and practices to identify and address biases.

A

Ongoing review and evaluation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Ensuring that all individuals have equal access to opportunities for involvement and participation.

A

Commitment to and training in inequality of opportunities

17
Q

Developing tailored approaches to reach and engage marginalized populations.

A

Specific strategies for involving excluded groups

18
Q

Ensuring that the voices of all relevant groups are represented in decision-making processes.

A

Clarity on the issue of representation

19
Q

Assessing the inclusivity and diversity of involvement initiatives.

A

Evaluation of participation