WEBER SOC SCI Flashcards
How does Weber deployed his notion of a social scientist to cope with the essentially ‘infinite’ nature of historical data
finding a ‘middle way’ between scientific objectivity and ‘limitless relativism’
what does his ‘middle way’ involve
the grouping of historical phenomena into ‘ideal types’
of both a ‘universal’ nature relating to the sociological aspect of his enquiry, and the uniquely schematic presentations of complex historical phenomena which dubs him the ‘scientist’
he rejects the ??? nature of ‘traditional’ historical enquiry
irresoluble
of ‘value-judgements’ being discussed in ‘scientific terms’
how does W reject the irresolvable nature of traditional enquiry
investigates the relations between values and presents the question to the ‘specialist’ to determine a more ultimate judgement
what type of enquirer is W
interdisciplinary enquirer of ‘nomological knowledge’ through the lens of ‘ideal types’
Weber understands that ‘empirical science cannot tell someone what he ought to do…
but only what he can do and - possibly - what he wants to do”, and this is translated into his central condition of corresponding to the ‘real situation’ at the present time
Through social science he pursues historical events in an anti-determinist way absent from???
‘from a set of historical conditions’ and proceeds to investigate a ‘science of reality’ in a dialectic methodological approach…
IN HIS AXIOM OF SPECIALISATION DISCUSSED MOST PROM IN SCI {WISSENS} AS A VOCATION
primary concern with?
present phenomena, which he explains through his understanding of modern Kultur – or the modern scheme of ‘plural’ values - described in The Protestant Ethic
NOTION OF A SOC SCI ARGUMENT
uses the notion of a social scientist to strengthen his understanding of modern Kultur through the lens of ‘ideal types’ in a schematic break down of the past, which becomes his methodological solution to the problems of the ‘infinity’ of historical fact
value scheme in G at time he writes
pluralised
National unity was not synonymous with unification of 1871
W’s values reflect those of G body politic
both his ‘values’ as an individual reflected those of the German body politic – that of ‘insoluble value-plurality’
what does W’s values mean for his academic/hist enquiry
might begin with value-commitment, but it cannot ‘end with it’, nor be judged definitely by it
uses notion of a SS to pursues a T?
he uses his notion of a social scientist to pursue a truth which was ‘absolutely heterogenous’ with the generation of values which embraced a ‘plurality’
Act of ‘psychological renunciation’?
Weber himself describes as an ‘elementary duty of academic self control’
the relationship between a ‘value free’ Wissenschaft and ‘individual values’ was both
close and troubling
‘anarchy of values’
Troeltsch
fundamental to Weber’s approach, yet it is one that is conditioned by a ‘duty of self control’
W’s commitment to value freedom complied with what duty
duty to observe intellectual honesty and integrity’ (Rechtschaffenheit)
in PE he denounces what?
methodically denounces ‘logical consequences’ from the evaluative position, and uses Wissenschaft not to ‘prescribe one’s values’ but to present relations between values to ‘tell them only how to think’
NOT SECULAR?
that historical understanding can ‘only become comprehensible if we understand the connection of these dogmas with practical religious interests’
BUT ‘religious interests’ have to be discovered in the ?
psychological drives [Antriebe] which led people to behave in a certain way’, thus free of definite ‘values’ which ‘superficial to the theological scholar’.
‘ideal type’ reveal history in its most? form
PE - ‘most logically consistent form’
WHY THE importance of presenting religious ideas as ‘ideal types’, which become his method? PE
‘for precisely because of the impossibility of drawing clear boundaries in historical reality, we can only hope to arrive at the specific effects of these ideas by examining their most consistent form’ PE
importance of presenting religious ideas as ‘ideal types’ SCI AS VOC?
‘middle way’ between scientific objectivity and ‘limitless relativism’
W on Wissenschaft?
Wissenschaft cannot dictate what one’s values should be, and the role of Wissenschaft must be to “enable the listener to discover the vantage point from which he can judge the matter in the light of his own ultimate ideals”… ONLY B ACHIEVED THRU IDEAL TYPES - discuss each christian sect
imp of ideal types 4 relig/pol judgement
Part of presenting the ‘ideal type’ is to avoid promoting or denigrating the political – or here – religious ideas
SCIENTIFIC IMPARTIALITY