how secular = ranke treatment of ref Flashcards
his treatment of the Reformation possesses neither
religious nor irreligious leanings
Even in moments where Ranke inclines towards Protestantism, implied by his enthusiasm for leading Protestant reformers such as Luther, Ranke consistently
writes objectively without personal acclamation
he can be claimed a secular historian, narrating religious histories without personal or moral affiliations, focusing fundamentally on empirical evidence from both
the Catholic and Protestant sides
Yet Ranke communicates a sense of the ideas of God and his moving presence within the decline of
universal powers and the growth of Protestantism
Ranke commits to ‘what really happened’ based on his religious belief that the historian can only
sense God in the actual world, including events, which bear the presence and ideas of God, and in this vein Ranke’s motive for the Reformation, both as a historical writing and event, deviate from secularism
Both within his empirical narrative and motivations of The History of the Reformation of Germany, Protestantism emerges as a fundamental
thought to his retelling of history, as seen in his tenable appreciation of Luther and Protestant developments
Yet his treatment of the Reformation is largely impartial and neither religion nor irreligious in narrative voice, and thus his History of the Reformation becomes a more
secular rhetoric, inspired by the religious movement ‘which most attracted him’ .
Ranke’s disengagement with either a religious or irreligious perspective with the Reformation can deem him somewhat secular…
‘instruct the present for the benefit of future ages’
‘how things really were’
Ranke, ‘like a skilful
physician
Introduction to the History of the Reformation in Germany, Johnson
enjoyed a high degree of aloofness and detachment of mind in his treatment of the Reformation
In reflecting on the Lutheran contest with the papacy in Germany, Ranke simply reports the details of the event, discovered by
empiricism, and expressed in an objective way that strips back empirical sources to the principal events of the time.
He recounts ‘the tumultuous rising of the lowest classes of the people, who, not content with reforms in the creed, ran emancipation from the see of Rome…. i.e., the complete overthrow of Church and State’.
State’. Considering his Protestant loyalties Ranke ought to have felt warmly towards such a concept, or at least towards the prospect of Lutheranism as a large Protestant sect penetrating Germany in the 14th century, yet he resists to providing even a word of personal opinion or evaluation in response to the changing religious dynamic in Germany.
Ranke refers to Luther as being
in a truly heroic state of mind’
justifies ‘he accordingly set out on his way, regardless of the pope’s excommunication or the emperor’s ban’. This is an example of his objectivity which is often clouded in its figurative nature;
In moments when Ranke does provide judgements or commentaries of the reformation, he most often does so through the voice of a
contemporary
contemporary commentary on the Diffusion of the New Doctrines
he quotes the Swiss Protestant theologian Oswold Myconius who argued that the ‘Christian Church is a spiritual hidden body, and not of this world, it follows that this body cannot have a worldly, outward and visible head’
In criticising the papacy, arguably something which Ranke ought to have felt passionately about, he abstains from any personal religious or irreligious view as uses Myconius’ commentary
‘that the Christian Church can acknowledge a head so spotted with sin as the pope’
Despite his potential agreement with Myconius Ranke maintains a personal detachment which makes his histories exempt from any religious or irreligious leanings