Verrall Flashcards
Important properties of Bayesian models (2)
Verrall
- can incorporate expert knowledge
- easily implemented
Main ways expert knowledge can be incorporated in reserve estimates (2)
- change the LDF in some rows due to external info (BF)
- limit data informing the LDF selection
BF estimated reserve formula
Verrall
estimated reserves = Mean * % Unpaid
expected incremental paid = M_i * y_i
Key difference between the CL and BF methods
Verrall
BF incorporates external expert knowledge for the level of each row vs. the CL which is based on the data
Stochastic CL reserving methods and what each one estimates (4)
- Mack’s method
- ODP
- over-dispersed negative binomial
- normal approximation to the negative binomial
*ODP estimates incremental losses, all others can be used to estimate cumulative OR incremental losses
Advantage of Mack’s CL method
Verrall
simple - parameter estimates and prediction errors can be obtained with a spreadsheet
Disadvantages of Mack’s CL method (2)
Verrall
- no predictive distribution
- must estimate additional parameters to calculate variance
Expected value and variance of incremental claims using ODP methodology
(Verrall)
E[ incremental claims ] = ultimate loss * % emerged
» E[C-sub ij] = x-sub i * y-sub i
Var( incremental claims ) = mean * dispersion factor
Advantage of the ODP model
Verrall
produces reserve estimates that are the same as the CL method
Disadvantages of ODP model (2)
Verrall
- column and row sums of incremental claims must be positive
- hard to see the connection to the CL method
Expected value and variance of incremental claims under the over-dispersed negative binomial model
E[C_i,j] = (lambda - 1) * D_i,j-1
Var[C_i,j] = Var[D_i,j] = phi * lambda * E[C_i,j]
C = incremental
D = cumulative
lambda = LDF
Advantage of the over-dispersed negative binomial model
results are the same as ODP = CL
method looks like chainladder so easier to explain
Disadvantage of the over-dispersed negative binomial model
column sum of incremental claims must be positive
Enhancement to the normal approximation of the negative binomial model (over the over-dispersed negative binomial)
alters the variance to allow for negative incremental claims
Expected value and variance of incremental AND cumulative claims under the normal approximation to the negative binomial model
E[ incremental claims ] and E[ cumulative claims] are the same as the over-dispersed negative binomial model
Var(incremental claims) = Var(cumulative claims) = dispersion factor * prior cumulative claims
*dispersion factor for each column