Siewert Flashcards
Advantages of high deductible plans (5)
- achieves price flexibility while passing additional risk to larger insureds
- reduced residual market charges and premium taxes
- cash flow advantages for the insured (b/c insurer pays first)
- provides incentive for insureds to control losses while providing large loss protection
- allows “self-insurance” without rigorous state requirements
Per aggregate XS losses under the LR approach
per aggregate XS loss = P * E * (1 - chi) * phi
P = Premium
E = ELR
chi = occurrence charge
this is the % of total losses XS of the deductible
phi = aggregate charge
this is losses in the deductible layer that exceed the aggregate
Advantages of the LR approach to estimating XS losses (3)
- can be used with no/immature data
- LR estimate can be consistently tied to pricing programs
- relies on a more credible pool of company and industry experience
Disadvantage of the LR approach to estimating XS losses
ignores actual experience (less useful for mature AYs)
Reason limits should be indexed for inflation
it keeps the proportion of deductible / excess losses consistent over time
otherwise, historical losses take too long to hit the deductible limit and distorts LDFs
Advantages of the implied development approach to estimating XS losses (2)
- provides estimate of XS losses at early maturities, even if no losses have yet emerged
- limited LDFs are more stable than unlimited
Disadvantage of the implied development approach for estimating XS losses
does not explicitly recognize XS loss development
Limited tail factor formula using an inverse power curve
age-to-age factor = 1 + a * (t + c) ^ -b
t is the starting age in years
Advantage and disadvantage of using an inverse power curve for the limited tail factor selection
advantage: produces uniformly decreasing tail factors that are consistent for each limit
disadvantage: bias exists because each limit is extended to the same maturity
direct development approach - relationship of LDF and Limited LDF
LDF(L,t) = LDF(t) * R(L) / R(L,t)
(t) = LDF at age t
(L,t) = limited at L at age t
(L) = limited at L at ultimate
XS LDF under the direct development approach for estimating XS losses
XSLDF(L,t) = LDF(t) * (1 - R(L))/(1-R(L,t))
(L,t) = limited at L at age t
(L) = limit at L at ultimate
(t) = unlimited at age t
Weighted average form of the direct development approach
LDF(t) = R(L,t) * LDF(L,t) + (1 - R(L,t)) * XSLDF(L,t)
(t) = unlimited at time t
(L,t) = limited at L at time t
(L) = limited at ultimate
Advantages of the direct development approach for estimating XS losses (2)
- explicitly recognizes excess development
- ensures consistency between limited and excess LDFs
Disadvantages of the direct development approach for estimating XS losses (2)
- XS LDFs tend to be volatile and overly leveraged
- over/under estimates reserves at early ages
Credibility weighting/BF method for estimating XS losses
L = Ot * LDFt * Z + E * (1 - Z)
when Z = 1/LDFt then this equals BF method
becomes paid to date + E * % unpaid