Clark Flashcards
Key elements of a statistical loss reserving model (2)
- expected amount of loss to emerge (point estimate)
- distribution of actual emergence around expected value (range of possible outcomes)
Loglogistic growth curve
G(x) = x^omega / (x^omega + theta^omega)
Weibull growth curve
G(x) = 1 - e^ -(x / theta)^omega
*shorter tail compared to Loglogistic
Advantages to using parameterized curves to describe loss emergence pattern (3)
- simple estimation
- ability to use data from triangles w/o evenly spaced evaluation dates
- creates a smooth curve
Number of parameters in the LDF method (*Clark)
n + 2
- n AYs
- omega
- theta
Number of parameters in the CC method (*Clark)
3
- omega
- theta
- ELR
Reasons the CC method has a lower parameter and total variance (2)
- reduced number of parameters
- additional info included in the exposure base
Difference b/w LDF and CC methods
Clark
LDF - assumes AYs are independent
CC - assumes a known relationship b/w ultimate losses across AYs»_space; described by ELR
Tests for constant ELR assumption (2)
Clark
- plot ultimate LRs by AY
- plot normalized residuals against expected incremental losses and look for a random scatter around the 0 line
Variance / mean ratio (sigma^2)
= 1 / (n - p) * sum[ (actual - expected)^2 / expected)
> calculate chi-squared triangle and then sum
Advantages of using the ODP distribution (2)
Clark
- high flexibility - scaling factor, sigma^2, allows matching 1st and 2nd moments of any distribution
- results presented in a familiar format (produces LDF and CC estimates)
Advantage of MLE
works with negative or 0 incremental loss amounts
Key assumptions from Clark’s model (3)
- incremental losses are i.i.d.
- var/mean scale parameter is fixed and known
- variance is based on approx. to Rao-Cramer lower bound (minimized)
Residual plots to test model assumptions (what to look for and 4 types of tests)
want: random scatter around zero line
can plot against:
- increment age (how well loss emergence curve fits incremental losses at different dev. Periods)
- expected loss (var/mean ratio is constant)
- AY
- CY (diagonal effects)
Handling truncation (3)
- ELR is always calculated before truncation
- LDF method truncates LDF (fitted / truncated fitted)
- CC method truncates % reported (difference)
Which has the smallest variance and why: discounted or un-discounted reserves?
discounted reserves - the tail has the largest parameter variance but also receives the deepest discount
How to handle partial exposure periods
scale by % earned
Normalized residuals (Clark)
r_i = (c_i - mu_i) / (sigma*sqrt(mu_i))
c = actual
mu = expected
Parameter variance calculation
Clark
Parameter variance = var(ELR) * premium^2
Why is parameter variance generally greater than process variance?
(Clark)
Few data points in the triangle means that most of the uncertainty comes from parameter estimation (vs. randomness)
MLE term
Clark
maximizing loglikelihood is equivalent to maximizing:
L = c_i * ln(mu_i) - mu_i