va civ pro Flashcards
A plaintiff has the right to take a first nonsuit at any time before
(i) a motion to strike the evidence has been sustained,
(ii) the jury retires from the bar to decide the case, or
(iii) the action has been submitted to the court for decision.
a judge, in imposing sanctions, has the power to
strike the evidence.
Under the Virginia Supreme Court rules (Rule 4:12), the court may impose sanctions for a party’s failure to
comply with a discovery order.
When the party has failed to attend his own deposition, serve answers to interrogatories, or respond to a request for production or inspection, the court may impose certain sanctions, including
striking the pleadings but not contempt, without the prior entry of an order to compel these discovery actions.
Virginia’s sanction statute (Va. Code Ann. 8.01-271.1) grants a court the authority to
impose appropriate sanctions on any violation of this statute’s requirements whether the violation is brought to the court’s attention through a motion or the court acts on its own initiative.
Virginia’s sanction statute provides that the attorney who represents a party (or a party who is proceeding pro se), by filing a pleading or making a motion, whether in writing or orally, certifies that:
i) He has read the pleading, motion, or other paper;
ii) To the best of his knowledge, information, and belief, formed after reasonable inquiry, it is well grounded in fact and is warranted by existing law or a good faith argument for the extension, modification, or reversal of existing law; and
iii) It is not interposed for any improper purpose, such as to harass or to cause unnecessary delay or needless increase in the cost of litigation.
The Virginia Sanction Statute gives the court the authority to award
reasonable attorney’s fees and costs as sanctions, and require the sanctioned attorney to pay them.
Among the limited situations in which the courts and judges may issue attachments for contempt, and punish summarily is when
vile, contemptuous, or insulting language addressed to or published of a judge in respect of any act or proceeding had, or to be had, in such court.
Among the sanctions that the court may impose for violation of the Virginia sanction statute is
prohibiting the attorney from practicing before it.
The Canons of Judicial Conduct mandate that a judge should inform the Virginia State Bar when the judge has knowledge that a lawyer has
committed misconduct that raises a “substantial question” about the lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other respects.
A notice of appeal must be filed within
30 days after entry of the final order
the 30 day notice of appeal filing period is not interrupted by
the filing of a motion for a new trial or a motion to vacate.
Generally, in any civil action, there is no appeal as of right to
the Virginia Supreme Court.
An appeal to the Virginia Supreme Court is by
petition and therefore subject to the discretion of the Virginia Supreme Court.
negligence action is appealable to the Virginia Supreme Court only by
petition
Any party may move for summary judgment: when?
at any time after the parties are at issue (i.e., after responsive pleadings have been filed).
At the conclusion of the plaintiff’s presentation of evidence at trial, a defendant may move to
strike the evidence presented by the plaintiff.
At the conclusion of the presentation of evidence by all parties, who may move to strike the evidence?
any party may move to strike the evidence presented by another party.
In support of or challenge to a summary judgment motion, a party may rely on
the pleadings, pretrial orders, admissions, interrogatories, and documents produced through discovery.
for support of/challenge to a summary judgment motion, A party generally may not rely on
a discovery deposition in support of a summary judgment motion
In support of or challenge to a summary judgment motion, a party may rely on a discovery deposition if:
(i) all parties to the action agree,
(ii) the action is only between business entities and the amount at issue is $50,000 or more, or
(iii) the plaintiff is seeking punitive damages.
Jurisdiction goes to the core power of a court to
make a binding adjudication of an issue.
Because jurisdiction is a matter of the court’s power to decide the case, an objection to subject-matter jurisdiction can be raised
at any time during the litigation or on appeal.
The parties do not waive an objection to subject-matter jurisdiction by failing to raise the issue in
the Answer.
A ruling by the trial court is not a basis for reversal unless
an objection was stated with reasonable certainty at the time of the ruling, except for good cause shown or to enable the Supreme Court to attain the ends of justice.
in Virginia, collateral estoppel bars the parties from
relitigating a particular factual issue once it has been actually litigated between the same parties.
Both sides are bound in later litigation by
the fact finding in the first action.
A temporary injunction is issued to
prevent someone from doing an act or directing someone to do an act.
Jurisdiction for TRO’s is only in
the circuit courts
preferred venue for a motion seeking a temporary injuncton is in
the circuit court where the act is being threatened to be done or is being done.
An application for a temporary injunction may be supported or opposed by
an affidavit or verified pleading
when filing a motion for a temporary injunction
a bond must be posted unless the court determines it would be improper.
the posted bond for a temporary injunction is based on the costs and damages that
will be sustained by the opposing party if found to be incorrectly enjoined
if the court orders the temporary injunction, it will not take effect until
the bond is posted
A temporary injunction may be awarded if the court is satisfied that
the plaintiff is entitled to equity.
In considering whether to grant or deny request for injunctive relief, the Court should consider
(i) whether moving party has an adequate remedy at law;
(ii) whether moving party is likely succeed on the merits;
(iii) if moving party is likely to suffer irreparable harm without such relief;
(iv) does the balance of the equities tip in movants favor; and
(v) whether the relief in the public interest.
no single factor for determining injunctive relief is
dispositive
necessary parties:
All persons interested in the subject matter of a suit and to be affected by its results
A person who is subject to service of process may be joined as a party in the action if
1) in the person’s absence complete relief cannot be accorded among those already parties, or
2) the person claims an interest relating to the subject of the action and is so situated that the disposition of the action in the person’s absence may as a practical matter impair or impede the person’s ability to protect that interest or leave any of the persons already parties subject to a substantial risk of incurring double, multiple, or otherwise inconsistent obligations by reason of the claimed interest of the person to be joined.
To secure an injunction, a plaintiff must demonstrate
(i) A clear showing that the plaintiff will likely succeed on the merits;
(ii) A clear showing that the plaintiff is likely to suffer irreparable harm without such relief;
(iii) The balance of the equities tip in the plaintiff’s favor; and
(iv) The relief is in the public interest.
Even when appropriate, however, granting equitable relief such as an injunction is
discretionary with the court.
To pursue a preliminary injunction, movant must
file a Bill of Complaint in circuit court to initiate his action.
A preliminary injunction may be issued only after
a hearing on the need for the equitable relief
Final decisions by the circuit court in civil cases are appealable to
the Court of Appeals of Virginia as of right
The statute of limitations for a civil action seeking recovery for personal injuries is
two years, regardless of the theory of recovery.
The cause of action in a personal injury action generally begins to run when
the injury is received.
tolling provision for infancy (i.e., minority)
If a person entitled to bring an action is an infant at the time the cause accrues, the period of limitations does not start to run until the disability is removed
To preserve an issue for appeal
a prompt objection to the trial court’s action must be made, stating the grounds for the objection.
Failure to do so will result in the issue being waived except
(i) if the issue goes to the jurisdiction of the trial court, (ii) for good cause shown, or (iii) to attain the ends of justice.
Generally, excluded testimony is made part of the record when the lawyer offering the testimony, outside the presence of the jury, makes a
proffer or summary what it is believed the witness will say and the other side does not object to the accuracy of the summary.
A notice of appeal must be in writing and filed with the clerk of the general district court within
10 days of the entry of the judgment or order.
When a statute or court rule requires that an act be performed within a prescribed amount of time after any event or judgment, the day on which the event or judgment occurred
should not be counted.
When the last day for performing an act during the course of a judicial proceeding falls on a Saturday, Sunday, legal holiday, or any day or part of a day on which the clerk’s office is closed as authorized by an act of the General Assembly, the act may be performed
on the next day that the clerk’s office is not closed.
The appeal of a judgment by the General District Court to the Circuit Court is heard
de novo.
when a case is heard de novo, on appeal from GDC to Circuit
A new trial is held in the circuit court on any claim or counterclaim that has been properly appealed.
An appellate court generally considers only errors that appear in
the record of the trial court proceedings.
An appellate court does not hear
additional evidence regarding a matter on appeal.
Arbitration agreements are
enforceable in Virginia
Under the Uniform Arbitration Act, a court can compel arbitration if:
(1) there is an agreement between the parties to arbitrate and one party refuses, and (2) the court compelling the arbitration has jurisdiction over the claim.
In Virginia, the Circuit Court has original jurisdiction over any claim for money damages that exceeds
$4,500.
One party’s mere disagreement with the outcome of the arbitration is not enough to
vacate an award.
A court can only vacate an arbitration award if there is
unfairness involved, either in the conduct of the arbitrator herself, or in the procedures followed.
unfairness in the arbitratration can be in the form of
fraud or other undue influence on the part of the arbitrator, as well as the arbitrator exceeding the scope of her power, refusing to postpone a hearing upon sufficient cause, refusing to admit evidence material to the controversy, or the fact that there was no valid arbitration agreement in the first place.
To enforce the arbitration award, a party must make an application to the court having jurisdiction over the parties for the court to
confirm the award and to enter a judgment in conformity with the award.
Generally, a motion for a new trial is
a general motion
a motion for a new trial is not specifically related to the verdict but instead seeking redress for
a certain procedural defects or instances of plain error by the court or misconduct by the jury.
a motion for a new trial is a mechanism that is available where the jury has committed an error that prejudiced a party, examples including
discussing things that should not have been, or misconduct during deliberations, or attempts to tamper with the jury.
Grounds for granting a new trial are those that are so substantial that it
could have resulted in a different verdict, and could not be discovered by due diligence prior to trial.
Under Virginia law, in a civil action a jury verdict must be
unanimous.
If the verdict is not unanimous, this results in
a hung jury
if theres a hung jury, the judge must
declare a mistrial at that point and order a new trial on all issues
because the foreperson of the jury rendered a unanimous verdict to the court, when in fact it was not unanimous, provides for sufficient grounds for
granting motion for new trial.
Generally, during trial communications by a third party with jurors on matters that are material to the case are presumed to be
prejudicial; may be rebutted by evidence showing them to have been harmless.
grounds for granting a new trial include
witness tampering
witness tampering requires that
they were not done with intention of improperly influencing the decision of jury; and not material
If the court were to decide third party communications with a juror could have been prejudicial, the judge may
order an investigation into the matter, and call the juror before the court to inquire about the conversation and its impact on the verdict.
motion for a new trial is not the proper mechanism where
the defendant contends the award is excessive
the proper motion where the defendant contends the award is excessive would be a motion to
set aside the verdict as contrary to the evidence
the standard when the court is determining whether awarded damages are excessive is as follows
The judge does not weigh the evidence , but determines as a matter of law whether the jury could have reached such a verdict as it did from a reasonable consideration of the evidence and the instructions given by the court, and unless the judge can enter judgment for the other party, a new trial on all issues is the appropriate remedy
A motion to set aside the verdict as contrary to the evidence should be granted where
the verdict is based on such insufficient evidence that is so plainly wrong that justice would not be done by enforcing the judgement against the party.
as it relates to excessive damages, grounds for granting the motion to set aside the verdict as contrary to the evidence include
when there is no legal measure of damages, such as pain and suffering, and future losses
the standard for the excessiveness of an award is if it is
so excessive that it shocks the conscience
Grounds an assertion that the award is excessive are
jury sympathy to a party, bias, or misunderstanding of the evidence or instruction
court can order a new trial on damages alone if
liability is clearly established
where an award is excessive, instead of granting a new trial, the court can suggest
remittitur
Remittitur entails the court telling the Plaintiff that they have the option to either
1) accept a reduced award (which in the courts mind is fairer and more reasonable given the evidence at trial, and which does not shock the conscience) or;
2) if the plaintiff rejects the lowered amount the court will order a new trial on all issues.
Generally, punitive damages are not permitted unless
the defendants are deemed to be reckless, or willful and wanton.
Generally, a post-trial motion occurs after
the court enters judgment or decree and the moving party seeks review from that court.
With respect to post-trial motions in Virginia
timing is critical
The governing Virginia rule on timing of post trial potions is
breast of court
under breast of court
if after the circuit court does not suspend, vacate, or modify its final judgment, within 21 days of that final judgment being entered, the court loses jurisdiction over the case, and thus cannot make any rulings thereafter.
The only exception to the breast of court rule is if
fraud is found
A motion for a new trial falls under the timing requirement for
post-trial motions following the entering of a final judgment
while evidence presented at trial was limited to conflicting testimony between the parties, the jury was permitted to
award a verdict that was less than that sought by the plaintiff in his complaint.
if the court denies a party’s motion for a new trial, the best course of action is to
proceed with filing an appeal to the Virginia Court of Appeals
In Virginia, a party generally has a right to appeal a final judgment from the circuit court in civil cases involving
$500 or more to the Court of Appeals of Virginia (CAV).
post-trial motions do not extend the time period for which a party has to
file a notice of appeal.
In order to properly appeal her case an Appellant must
file a notice of appeal with the clerk of the circuit court which presided over the case at trial, no later than 30 days after the entry of the final judgment, along with copies of the notice of appeal sent to all opposing counsel
a timely filing of notice of appeal
perfects such appeal
With regard to the content of the notice of appeal, it must
state whether any incidents of the case will be filed such as trial transcripts, or statement of facts.
The appellant must also
file a notice of appeal with the court of appeals and at that time pay the filing fee; which late payment is ok if within 10 days after filing NOA, after which the appeal will be dismissed
record of appeal includes
documents, exhibits, instructions given or refused, trial court orders, and a transcript of the trial so long as it was filed with the trial court within 60 days following the final judgment.
Once the record of appeal is filed with the court of appeals, the appellant must file her opening brief within
40 days of that filing
The appellants opening brief must contain
a statement of the nature of the case and proceedings in circuit court and any assignments of error with references to the record, where that error was preserved
The SCV can either grant the petition or deny it based on
their own discretion
a request for admission is
a written request that someone admit certain matters
In federal practice, a request for admission
1) The responding party must respond in writing within 30 days of service, either denying specifically or objecting.
2) If a party fails to deny a proper request, the matter is deemed admitted.
While in federal court a response to a request for admission is due within 30 days, in Virginia it is
21 days of service, however a party can move for an extension to respond.
If the response is not sent within the 21 days and no extension is granted by the court; the question is deemed
admitted.
In order to properly object to venue, the defendant must
file an objection to venue, and not a motion to dismiss based on improper venue; within 21 days of service of process upon defendant
The circuit courts have exclusive jurisdiction over amounts sued for in excess of $25,000 for actions to
recover specific personal property
circuit courts have concurrent civil jurisdiction with the General District Court for actions to recover specific personal property when
the amount claimed is more than $4,500, but does not exceed $25,000, excluding costs, fees, and interest.
the jurisdiction of the circuit courts includes concurrent civil jurisdiction with the General District Court for wrongful death actions when
the amount claimed is more than $4,500, but does not exceed $50,000, excluding any claim for costs, attorney’s fees, and interest
jury trials are held in
the circuit courts, not the General District Court
circuit courts do generally have exclusive jurisdiction over amounts sued for in excess of
$50,000.
A motion “craving oyer” in Virginia seeks a court order compelling the plaintiff to
produce a document mentioned in, but not attached to the complaint that is essential to the complaint.
if a motion craving oyer is sustained:
the document becomes part of the plaintiff’s complaint and the defendant can rely on the document in a demurrer.
a motion craving oyer is not
a discovery tool for compelling the plaintiff to produce relevant evidence, but instead places in the document that forms the basis for the complaint into the record.
a demurrer is a responsive pleading that contends
that the original pleading does not state a cause of action or fails to state facts upon which relief may be granted.
a special appearance is made by a person to
challenge the court’s jurisdiction or the validity of service of process.
a plea in bar is a pleading that
asserts facts that, if proven, constitute a bar to an equitable claim
a plea in bar typically asserts facts supporting
an affirmative defense, such as the statute of limitations or the Statute of Frauds.
The General District Court shares concurrent original jurisdiction with the circuit court for an action to recover property damages that do not exceed
25,000
for actions to recover property damages that exceed $25,000
the circuit court has exclusive original jurisdiction.
A party may discover facts known or opinions held by an expert who has been retained or specially employed by another party in anticipation of litigation or in preparation for trial who is not expected to be called as a witness at trial, only upon a showing of
exceptional circumstances under which it is impracticable for the party seeking discovery to obtain facts or opinions on the same subject by other means.
the facts known and opinions held by a non-testifying expert employed by the other party are not discoverable merely because
they are relevant.
A final circuit court decision involving divorce is appealable by right to
the Court of Appeals of Virginia, not to the Supreme Court of Virginia.
the circuit court failed to either specifically retain jurisdiction in the matter or modify the decree within 21 days of the entry of its order
circuit court lacked the authority to modify the divorce decree; only the proper appellate court has jurisdiction to review the modified order.
final decisions by the circuit court in civil cases are appealable to
the Court of Appeals of Virginia, not the Supreme Court of Virginia.
A party must appeal a final circuit court order within
30 days of the entry of the order.
process that has reached the person to whom it is directed within the time prescribed by law, if any, is sufficient even though
process was not served or accepted as required (except in divorce/annulment action)
for the service of process curative provision to apply
the documents that reach the person must constitute process
where the curative statutes renders service effective, the defendants motion to quash should be
denied
a special appearance may be entered in order to
challenge the exercise of personal jurisdiction over the defendant
a special appearance may be entered to
contest the validity of the service of process.
Although process was not served on the defendant by the private process server, under the curative statute, the service of process is not subject to challenge because
the defendant did ultimately receive the process.
Although process was not served in the proper manner because the defendant corporation received in the process in the mail, under curative statute
the service of process is not subject to challenge because the defendant did ultimately receive the process.
A party may orally move to
amend a pleading
granting leave to amend a pleading is
discretionary
the rules mandate a court to liberally grant leave to amend unless
another party would be prejudiced by the amendment.
A party may move to reopen a hearing to
consider further evidence
When the trial has concluded, a party may make a motion to reopen a hearing to consider further evidence, prior to
the court’s issuance of a final order or within the 21-day period in which the court retains control to modify, vacate, or suspend the order for 21 days after its entry.
a court disposition of a motion to reopen a hearing to consider further evidence is subject to
the court’s sound discretion
In the circuit court, a responsive pleading such as an answer is required to be filed within 21 days of service on the defendant unless
the judge grants additional time.
after the period for filing has expired
A judge has discretion to grant more time or to permit a party to file a pleading late
In evaluating a judge’s exercise of this discretion, an appellate court applies
an abuse-of-discretion standard.
Among the factors that a judge should consider in ruling on a party’s motion for leave to file a late pleading are:
(1) the length and reason for the delay, including whether the non-filing party acted in good faith,
(2) the existence of a substantial basis for the pleading itself (e.g., an answer that raises a valid defense), and
(3) the existence of prejudice to the other party if the filing is permitted.
In a circuit court proceeding, a defendant against whom a default judgment has been entered may not contest issues regarding
his liability at trial.
unlike a general district court action, in a circuit court action in the damages phase of the trial, the defendant (default judgment on liability entered against) may participate in the trial on damages by
objecting to evidence presented by the plaintiff regarding damages.
a defendant who is in default may nevertheless participate in the trial regarding
damages suffered by the plaintiff.
A defendant against whom has been entered a default judgment (with respect to liability) may not contest
the issue of liability
Because the circuit court entered a default judgment against Bart regarding liability, Paige is entitled to
a judgment against him.
a later determination that the plaintiff was contributorily negligent as a matter of law does not affect
the earlier adjudication of Defendant’s liability, when default judgment was entered on that issue
A party taking a nonsuit may refile within the later of
1) six months from the date of entry of the order granting the nonsuit or
2) within the original period of limitations, which ignores the filing of the action that was nonsuited
Since the original period of limitations expired while the first action was pending, the refilling of this action can satisfy the statute of limitations only if
it were brought within six months of the date that the court granted the nonsuit
the tolling of the statute of limitation during the pendency of a claim generally applies when the dismissal of the claim is
not on its merits
the tolling provision does not apply to the dismissal of a claim via
a nonsuit made at the request of the party.
A cross-claim must involve subject matter growing out of
a matter pleaded in the complaint
there is no requirement that a cross-claim be filed before or with
an answer
a cross-claim generally must be filed within
21 days of service on the defendant unless the court grants additional time
A circuit court judgment dated before July 1, 2021, is enforceable for
20 years from the date of the judgment
an action for tortious injury to property must be brought within
five years
the time limit for enforcement of a general district court judgment is
10 years from the date of the judgment
because of the amount of damages sought here for injury to property exceeded $50,000, the action must have been brought in
the circuit court
A circuit court judgment dated on or after July 1, 2021, is enforceable for
10 years from the date of the judgment
a judgment dated before July 1, 2021, is enforceable for 20 years generally without regard for
the judgment creditor’s reason for delaying enforcement of the judgment
when appealing from the GDC, aside from filing a notice of appeal to circuit within 10 days the judgment is entered; the appealing party must do what, and within what time period
Within 30 days from the date of judgment, the appealing party generally must pay the writ tax and court costs for the circuit court, and an appealing defendant generally must furnish an appeal bond.
Where is the appropriate forum for a proceeding to award an injunction: against prosecution of an action requiring all claims against a debtor to be brought in one proceeding
The appropriate forum is the circuit court of the county or city in which the judgment was rendered or such proceeding is pending.
Where is the appropriate forum for a proceeding to award an injunction against prosecution of an action prohibiting enforcement of a judgment earlier obtained in an action
The appropriate forum is the circuit court of the county or city in which the judgment was rendered or such proceeding is pending.
Where is the appropriate forum for a proceeding to award an injunction against prosecution of an action prohibiting enforcement of a judgment earlier obtained in an action
The appropriate forum is the circuit court of the county or city in which the judgment was rendered or such proceeding is pending.
Where is the appropriate forum for a proceeding to award an injunction that seeks to compel or prohibit any other act or proceeding
The appropriate forum is the circuit court of the county or city in which (i) the act is to be done, or being done, or is apprehended to be done; or (ii) the proceeding is pending.
The appropriate forum for a divorce is:
(i) The county or city where the parties last cohabited;
(ii) At the option of the plaintiff, where the defendant resides if the defendant is a resident of the Commonwealth; and
(iii) If an order of publication may be issued against the defendant, the county or city in which the plaintiff resides.
Where is the appropriate forum for distress action?
the county or city in which (i) the premises yielding the rent, or some part thereof, is located; or (ii) goods liable to distress may be found.
When a plaintiff requests that a defendant waive service, what happens if the defendant agrees
A defendant who agrees to waives service is granted additional time in which to respond to the complaint: 60 days for in-state defendants, or 90 days for defendants outside Virginia.
When a plaintiff requests that a defendant waive service, what happens if the defendant refuses to waive service
If a defendant refuses to comply with a request for waiver made by a plaintiff, the court must impose the costs subsequently incurred in effecting service on the defendant unless good cause for the failure is shown.
Who can serve process
Any person who is at least 18 old and not a party or otherwise interested in the subject matter in controversy may serve process, including private process servers.
where can a sheriff or deputy serve process
A sheriff or deputy can serve process within the sheriff’s jurisdiction or any contiguous jurisdiction.
In what order must the three modes of service on natural persons be attempted?
(1) Personal service
(2) Delivery to a family member aged 16 or over at the defendant’s usual place of abode
(3) Posting at apparent entrance to defendant’s place of abode
What is the curative statute regarding service of process?
Except in suits for divorce or annulment of a marriage, if improperly served process reaches the person to whom it is directed in time, service is good.
The curative statute does not apply to
mere notice or incomplete process
When long-arm jurisdiction does not apply, how must service of process be made on a foreign corporation authorized to do business in Virginia
Personal service on
(i) any officer, director, or the registered agent anywhere in Virginia,
(ii) a person designated to receive process, or
(iii) the clerk of the state corporation commission
When long-arm jurisdiction does not apply, how must service of process be made on a foreign corporation not authorized to do business in Virginia?
Personal service on any agent anywhere in Virginia
How can service of process be made on a nonresident who, personally or by agent, operates a motor vehicle or aircraft on the highways or airways of Virginia?
1) The Commissioner of the Department of Motor Vehicles (for motor vehicles) and
2) the Secretary of the Commonwealth (for aircraft)
are designated as statutory agents to receive service of process on behalf of these nonresident defendants.
What two inquiries must the court make when long-arm jurisdiction is challenged?
The court must determine
(1) whether the facts alleged engage any of the specific provisions of Virginia’s long-arm statute, and
(2) whether the defendant had sufficient minimum contacts with Virginia to make jurisdiction constitutional.
When a statutory agent receives service of process, what action must the agent take?
The statutory agent must mail a copy of the process to the defendant’s last known address and file a certificate of compliance with the clerk’s office.
What notice of a negligence claim must be given to a county, city, or town?
For each cognizable claim, the claimant must file a written statement that includes
(i) the nature of the claim,
(ii) the time of the injury, and
(iii) the place where the injury is alleged to have occurred.
(1) For what claims does the Virginia Tort Claims Act waive immunity?
The VTCA waives immunity for tort claims for
1) damage to or loss of property
2) or personal injury or death
3) caused by the negligent or wrongful act or omission of any employee acting within the scope of his employment.
Whose immunity is waived by the Virginia Tort Claims Act?
The VTCA waives immunity on behalf of state and transportation districts, but not local government.
If a plaintiff wants to sue a state agency under the Virginia Tort Claims Act, who is the proper defendant?
The proper defendant is the Commonwealth of Virginia, not the state agency.
How is the issue of adding a party raised?
A motion alleging nonjoinder
How is the issue of removing a party raised?
A motion alleging misjoinder
For an order to be final, the order must be
1) signed by the judge and
2) contain language indicating that the case is to be concluded by the order.
here the judge, by entry of an order, effectively says, “I am through with this case, there is nothing more for me, or the trial court, to do,” then it is
is a final order governed by Rule 1:1.
order indicated that “nothing further” would be done on the case
This language would likely be enough to render this order final.
Under Rule 1:1
1) Court retains control
2) to modify, vacate, or suspend
3) a final order for 21 days after entry
4) and no longer.
Entry of an order is defined as
the date the judge signs the order.
a final order becomes final and out of the control of the trial court
21 days after it is entered.
To avoid triggering the 21-day period, the order must contain
specific, express language indicating its lack of finality
under the 21 days of Rule 1.1, a motion for reconsideration not incorporated into the final order
would not affect the 21 day period
In interpreting Rule 1:1, the Virginia Supreme Court has stated that
1) the 21-day period will not be tolled by any post-trial motion, and that
2) the only way a judge can re-start the 21-day period is through an express modification, vacation, or suspension of the order.
if a party is concerned that the court will restore a prior order in opposing party’s favor, they should
draft an order that specifically forecloses any modification, suspension, or vacation of that final order after the expiration of Rule 1.1’s 21-day period.
A final judgment, order or decree of a circuit court is appealable as
of right to the Court of Appeals of Virginia.
A notice of appeal must be filed within
30 days of entry of the final order.
the 30 day notice of appeal deadline is not interrupted by
the filing of a motion for a new trial, modification of the order, reconsideration, or to vacate.
Only if the Circuit Court judge modifies, vacates, or suspends the order will
new time periods start all over.
In Virginia, a default judgment is entered in Circuit Court against the defendant when
the defendant fails to file a responsive pleading within 21 days of service.
If a default judgment is entered, the defendant may participate and introduce evidence relating to damages but may not
introduce evidence as to liability if a damages hearing is ordered.
when default judgment is entered against defendant, he
waives any right to future notice of proceedings, but if there is counsel of record for the defendant, notice must be sent to the defendant’s counsel regarding such future proceedings.
By making an appearance on behalf of the corporation, lawyer is now
the counsel of record and must be notified of any future proceedings in spite of prior default judgment against corporation.
Even if a default judgment is entered against a defendant, the defendant’s counsel of record, if there is one, is entitled to
to notice of future proceedings.
For the Circuit Court to hear a case, damages must be sought in an amount in excess of
$4,500
circuit court will not have personal jurisdiction over a defendant when
(1) The basic requirements of service of process were not met
2) and the curative statute does not alleviate defective service
who can serve process in Virginia?
1) any person 18 years of age or older and not involved in the litigation,
2) a Sherriff, or a Sherriff’s deputy