corporations Flashcards
Although shareholders of a corporation are generally not liable for the debts of a corporation, shareholders in a Virginia corporation, including a professional corporation, are
free to enter into agreements that alter the way in which a corporation is managed, including the relationship among shareholders and the corporation, even though the agreement is inconsistent with statutory provisions.
a shareholders agreement regarding liability for unpaid taxes is enforceable provided it is set forth or referenced either
(i) in the articles or the corporate bylaws and approved by all persons who are shareholders at the time of the agreement, or
(ii) in a written agreement that is signed by all persons who are shareholders at the time of the agreement and that is made known to the corporation.
The employees of a professional corporation are not shielded from
liability arising out of their own malpractice.
The employees of a professional corporation are shielded from
vicarious liability for malpractice committed by other professionals in the professional corporation.
a plaintiff in a malpratice action against a professional corporation could content that the court should
pierce the corporate veil and hold a shareholder liable for the corporations obligations
peircing the corporate veil is usually warranted only in extraordinary circumstances and mere failure to
observe corporate formalities( shareholder meetings/keeping minutes) is not sufficient
After a corporation has issued stock, a voluntary dissolution can occur when
the board of directors adopts a proposal for dissolution and two-thirds of the outstanding shares approves, or when all shareholders consent to the dissolution, even without approval of the board.
A shareholder can seek the involuntary dissolution of a corporation if
the acts of the board of directors or those in control of the corporation are illegal, oppressive, or fraudulent.
Upon termination, the property of the corporation passes automatically to
its directors as trustees in liquidation.
As trustees in liquidation, the directors discharge the liabilities and obligations, and then
distribute the remainder of the corporation’s assets among its shareholders according to their respective rights and interests.
While a member of a nonstock corporation is generally not entitled to a distribution, a member generally enjoys
the same rights as a shareholder of a stock corporation, such as the right to inspect the corporation’s books and records, and is subject to the same restrictions.
A shareholder in a stock corporation has the right to
1) inspect and copy corporate documents, so long as
2) the shareholder sends a signed written request at least 10 business days in advance.
For some corporate records, including minutes of the board of directors’ meetings and the list of shareholders of record, the shareholder must
1) have been a shareholder for at least six months or must be the record owner
2) or beneficial owner of at least five percent of the outstanding shares.
For inspecting corporate records the shareholder must have
a proper purpose
For inspecting corporate records the shareholders demand must
describe with reasonable particularity the purpose and the records being requested
A proper purpose is one that
relates to the shareholder’s interest in the corporation.
The law governing a nonstock corporation generally
parallels that of a stock corporation.
As is the case with regard to the shareholders of a stock corporation, the members of a nonstock corporation may
remove a director with or without cause.
To remove a director, unless the articles of incorporation provide otherwise,
a majority of the members must vote in favor of the removal of a director.
As is the case with regard to a director of a stock corporation, a nonstock corporation may generally
indemnify a director
indemnification of a director can be provided for in the corporations
articles of incorporation
indemnification of a director can be for
any judgment awarded against the director for acting in his role as a director, as well as provide for advancement and reimbursement of expenses with respect to the liability.
When the authorization for indemnification of a director (usually in the articles of incorporation) simply obligates the corporation to provide indemnification to the fullest extent permitted by law, the authorization is deemed to also require
the corporation to advance or reimburse reasonable expenses of any kind.
director may seek a court order to compel the corporation to
indemnify the director in accord with the indemnification authorization.
The only restriction on the corporation (relating to indemnification authorization) is that it cannot indemnify a director against liability for
(i) willful misconduct or (ii) a knowing violation of criminal law.
Under Virginia law, a shareholder retains her right to vote if she pledges stock for collateral unless
she signs an agreement to the contrary.
Often small corporations, restrict the ability of the shareholders to
transfer their shares
where a shareholder offers shares as collateral, this can constitute
a potential transfer if the shareholder defaults on the obligation
In Virginia, certain shareholders have the right to inspect and copy corporate documents, so long as
the shareholder sends a signed written request at least 10 business days in advance and has a proper purpose for doing so.
The shareholder may only inspect and copy the records at
the corporation’s main office during business hours
for some corporate records (e.g., minutes of the board of directors’ meetings, corporate accounting records, and the list of shareholders of record), the shareholder must have been
a shareholder for at least six months or must be the record owner or beneficial owner of at least five percent of the outstanding shares.
If there is any problem obtaining the records, shareholder has the right to
go to court and obtain an injunction.
Shareholders must be given written notice of an annual or special meeting
no less than 10 days and no more than 60 days before the meeting date.
A shareholder may waive notice of a meeting either
in writing or by attending the meeting.
a shareholder may attend a meeting to
object to the lack of notice or defective notice if the objection is made at the beginning of the meeting
where a shareholder attends a meeting to object to lack of notice/defective notice, the attendance is
not a waiver of the improper notice
shareholders of a corporation are generally not liable for
the debts of a corporation
shareholders in a Virginia corporation, including a professional corporation, are free to enter into agreements that
alter the way in which a corporation is managed, including the relationship among shareholders and the corporation, even though the agreement is inconsistent with statutory provisions.
The shareholder agreement must be set forth or referenced either
(i) in the articles or the corporate bylaws and approved by all persons who are shareholders at the time of the agreement, or
(ii) in a written agreement that is signed by all persons who are shareholders at the time of the agreement and that is made known to the corporation.
A director owes a duty of
care to the corporation
A director is not liable for a breach of this duty if
the director’s conduct was undertaken in good faith, which is a subjective standard
Virginia’s statutory business judgment rule protects a director’s decision if
the decision was made with good faith business judgment of the best interests of the corporation.
To overcome business judgment protection, the party challenging the director’s conduct bears the burden of persuasion, which generally requires a showing that
the director engaged in self-dealing or fraud or acted in bad faith.
delaying a corporate action for a purely personal reason is
not protected by the business judgment rule, and will be deemed a breach of the directors duty of care to the corporation
While the board of directors is responsible for managing the corporation’s business, the board of directors may generally act through
one or more committees, each of which must consist of at least two directors.
A director is entitled to rely on
the performance of, as well as information, opinions, reports, and statements supplied by a committee of the board of which the director is not a member if the director believes, in good faith, the committee merits confidence.
A director owes a duty of
loyalty to the corporation
In Virginia, subject to the business judgment rule, a director may not
directly or indirectly take a personal advantage from a transaction with the corporation unless the transaction is, “open, fair, and honest,” and competent counsel represents the corporation.
a director owes a duty of care to the corporation, but this duty is evaluated on a
a subjective standard and is subjected to the business judgment rule.
A director can breach the duty of loyalty by
usurping a corporate opportunity unless the director first makes the corporation aware of it.
A corporate opportunity is
a proposed activity that is reasonably incident to the corporation’s present or prospective business and in which the corporation has a capacity to engage.
piercing the corporate veil is appropriate where
shareholders treat the corporation as their alter ego by ignoring corporate formalities, such as using corporate funds for personal debts; or when the corporation is undercapitalized; and in cases to prevent fraud.
Failure to provide adequate capitalization at the time the corporation is formed can be a basis for
piercing the corporate veil
When the corporate veil is pierced, only the shareholders who were
active in managing the corporation are held liable.
contract claimants are less likely to pierce the corporate veil than
tort victims
For both unfair benefit and usurping, the director’s actions can be approved, limiting or negating liability if
independent ratification occurs
independent ratification requires
that a majority vote by shares held by independent shareholders votes to absolve the director of liability.
In Virginia, in order for a shareholder to bring a derivative suit
the corporation itself would have to have been able to bring the suit against the director itself.
claimant bringing the suit must also have standing, meaning
they must own at least one share of stock when the claim arose and during the entire litigation
shareholder who brings the suit must
adequately and fairly represent the corporation’s own interest
Prior to bringing a shareholder derivative suit, a shareholder must
first make written demand on the directors that they bring the suit, or 90 days has to have passed since making the demand on the directors; or the board expresses that irreparable harm will result if the shareholder waits the 90 days
claimant shareholder must still allege that the directors
failed to adequately review the demand, and then a committee of two or more independent directors can investigate and move for dismissal if the directors think the suit is not in the corporation’s best interest.
the termination of the corporations existence does not
terminate its corporate liabilities, nor does it create liability for the shareholders or directors for authorized business transactions of the corporation.
Where there is a vacancy on the board of directors of a corporation
the board of directors may fill the vacancy
For the board of directors to take an action at a meeting, there must be
quorum of the directors.
if there is a qourum at a board of directors meeting, to take an action
a majority of the directors at the meeting must approve of the act
the board of directors can fill a vacancy on the board regardless of
how the vacancy was created.
generally the role of selecting directors falls on
the shareholders
where there is a vacancy on the board of directors
the remaining directors as well as the shareholders may fill the vacancy.
The quorum requirement is applied to determine whether there is
a sufficient number of directors present for the board to act