PR Flashcards
Like trustees, lawyers owe their clients fiduciary duties of
scrupulous good faith, candor, and care in the management of the beneficiary’s interests.
the lawyer’s duty of loyalty to clients is the
bedrock of the attorney-client relationship.
As a general matter, a conflict of interest exists when
a lawyer’s “representation of a client will be materially limited by the lawyer’s … personal interests.” Va. Rule 1.7(a)(2).
A lawyer must not represent a client if the representation may be materially limited by the lawyer’s own interests, unless:
(1) the lawyer reasonably believes that he or she will be able to provide competent and diligent representation to the affected client; (2) the representation is not prohibited by law; and (3) the affected client gives consent after consultation.
A lawyer is prohibited from drafting a document that makes a substantial gift to
the lawyer or the lawyer’s close relatives. This restriction does not apply when the donee is related to the donor. Va. Rule 1.8(c).
A statement must be both
false and material for it to subject the lawyer to discipline.
Lawyers are prohibited from making statements that are fraudulent or remaining silent when
the statement or silence would amount to fraud under applicable tort principles.
As a general rule, a lawyer is not civilly liable for wrongful or negligent lawyering activity to those
outside the lawyer-client relationship.
when a lawyer’s work for a client is intended to benefit a third person, the lawyer owes a duty of care to
that third person.
A lawyer may not communicate with an opposing party who is represented by counsel without counsel’s consent when
the communication concerns a subject for which the lawyer is representing a client.
If the opposing party is an organization, the prohibition on communicating applies to employees who
supervise, direct, or regularly consult with the organization’s lawyer regarding the subject matter of the representation.
prohibition on communication with opposing party corporation does not apply to individuals who are
former employees or agents of the organization.
although a lawyer is not prohibited from communicating with unrepresented persons who are involved in a client’s matter, a lawyer is under an affirmative obligation to refrain from
stating or implying that the lawyer is disinterested in the matter about which the lawyer is communicating.
Under the Virginia Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer owes a duty of confidentiality to a client that generally prohibits
the disclosure of information communicated in confidence to the lawyer.
when a lawyer knows that a client has committed perjury by lying under oath, the lawyer has a duty to
take remedial measures.
The first remedial measure to take when a lawyer knows his client has committed perjury under oath is:
the lawyer should attempt to persuade the client to rectify the matter by revealing the fraud and testifying truthfully.
If the first remedial measure fails, and the proceedings have not yet concluded, the lawyer must
reveal the perjury.
despite having a duty of confidentiality regarding information learned during her representation of client, committed an ethical violation when she failed to take _____________________ regarding clients false testimony.
reasonable remedial measures
A lawyer has a duty to keep a client informed of
the status of the client’s matter
A lawyer has a duty to
communicate and reasonably share decision-making responsibilities with the client.
Specifically regarding a settlement offer, a lawyer has a duty to
inform a client of an offer and to abide by a client’s decision regarding acceptance.
a lawyer has a duty to act with reasonable diligence in representing a client and should not
let ordinary events, such as other work obligations, prevent the lawyer from acting.
regarding personal health issues, a lawyer has duty to
take those into consideration and make plans for the client’s representation accordingly.
a lawyer shall not assert or controvert an issue in a proceeding when
there is not a nonfrivolous basis for doing so (Rule 3.1).
a lawyer shall not make a false statement of fact or law to
a tribunal (Rule 3.3).
rule regarding discovery requests (3.4)
1) a lawyer shall not make a frivolous discovery request or
2) fail to make reasonably diligent efforts to comply with a legally proper discovery request by an opposing party
A concurrent conflict of interest exists if
he representation of one client will be directly adverse to another client, or there is a significant risk that the representation of a client will be materially limited by the lawyers responsibilities to another client, former client, or a third person, or the personal interests of the lawyer.
In the context of firm, all lawyers associated in the firm must not knowingly represent a client when any one of them practicing alone would be prohibited from doing so by the Rules, unless
the affected client consents after consultation.
Under the rules, a lawyer must not use information relating to the representation of a client to the advantage of
the lawyer or third person or to the disadvantage of the client, unless the client consents.
A concurrent conflict of interest may be waived, if
the attorney reasonably believes that they can diligently and competently represent each of the affected clients, provided that all affected clients consent after consultation.
a lawyer could not reasonably believe that they could diligently and competently represent both clients where
their interests are directly adverse to one another, and the lawyer has confidential information pertaining to one of the parties.
Under the rules of professional conduct, a lawyer who formerly represented a client in a matter may not thereafter represent another person in the same or substantially related matter if
that persons interests are materially adverse to those of the former client, unless both the present and former clients consent after consultation.
a lawyer or firm that formerly represented a client in a matter may not us information related to or gained in the course of the representation to the disadvantage of
the former client, or reveal information relating to that representation.
the duty to preserve confidential information continues after
the attorney client relationship has terminated.
Under the Virginia rules, papers produced as work product must be turned over to the client when
the representation is terminated
duty to return papers to the client exists even when
the client has not paid the lawyer’s fee.
upon withdrawal,any fees that have been paid to the lawyer but not yet earned
must be refunded to the client upon withdrawal
upon withdrawal, lawyer is entitled to keep any fees that
have been paid and earned
the duty to return papers to the client upon termination of the representation exists even when
the client has not paid the lawyer’s fee.
A lawyer shall not make or offer an agreement in which
a broad restriction on the lawyer’s right to practice is part of the settlement of a controversy, except when such a restriction is approved by a tribunal or a governmental entity.
Virginia Rule 5.6 thus prohibits a lawyer from
agreeing not to represent other clients in connection with settling a claim on behalf of a current client.
Under 5.6, a term in a settlement agreement limiting an attorney’s right to represent future clients in actions against the offering party would be
unethical.
Virginia Rule 5.6(b), contains an exception permitting restrictions on practice if approved by
a tribunal or government entity.
As a member of the Virginia Bar, an attorney must not
violate the Virginia Rules.
A lawyer must withdraw if continuing the representation will
violate the Virginia Rules.
if the client insisted on the settlement (with a provision restricting the lawyers ability to sue the opposition in the future) despite the attorney’s ethical objection
withdrawal would be necessary.
If you must withdraw, immediately:
(i) notify the client of his withdrawal as required by Va. Rule 1.16(d),
(ii) seek leave of the court to do so in accordance with Va. Rule 1.16(c), and
(iii) take reasonable measures to minimize the harm to the client resulting from the termination of representation, pursuant to Va. Rule 1.16(d).
Under Va. Rule 1.16, reasonable measures to minimize the harm to the client resulting from the termination of representation include:
(i) protecting the client’s confidentiality,
(ii) returning the client’s files, all work product, records, and any unearned fees, and
(iii) assisting the client while they seek to secure new counsel to avoid or minimize material harm to the client’s interests.
Agreeing to engage in and hide unethical behavior is
far more culpable behavior than an inadvertent ethical violation.
Lawyers (and judges) have a duty to report a fellow lawyer’s serious misconduct to the appropriate professional authority when
1) the lawyer or judge has “reliable information that another lawyer has committed” misconduct
2) “that raises a substantial question as to that lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer in other respects….”
No malpractice agreement
A lawyer is generally prohibited from entering into an agreement with a client that places a prospective limitation on the lawyer’s malpractice liability to the client.
No malpractice agreement exception:
Virginia recognizes an exception when the lawyer is an employee of the client as long as the client is independently represented in making the agreement.
Competency:
A lawyer must provide competent representation to a client.
Competent representation requires
the legal knowledge, skill, thoroughness and preparation reasonably necessary for the representation
A lawyer is not required to know the law that governs the client’s legal claim before undertaking representation, provided
the lawyer will be able to acquire the necessary knowledge with reasonable diligence.
success alone does not
prove competence nor excuse other violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct
Fee agreement:
A lawyer’s fee must be reasonable
A lawyer must adequately explain
her fee to a client
When a lawyer has not regularly represented a client, a written contract setting
the amount, basis, or rate of the fee is generally preferred;
but not required.
with a not regularly represented client the fee explanation should be made
before or within a reasonable time after commencing the representation.
A range of factors is considered when determining whether a fee is reasonable including
1) the experience of the lawyer performing the service and
2) the fee customarily charged in the locality for similar legal services.
customary contingency fee of
one-third of any recovery.
In a personal injury action, a lawyer is permitted to charge a fee that is
contingent on the outcome of the matter.
A contingent fee agreement, unlike other fee agreements, must be
in writing and must be signed by the client.
The written agreement for a contingency fee arrangement must explain
the way in which the fee will be calculated and, in particular, the way in which deductions for expenses will be calculated.
The lawyer must also provide an ending statement in writing to the client explaining
the outcome of the matter and providing the calculation of the fee and expenses.
Unlike other jurisdictions, Virginia has not adopted the Model Rule that prohibits
most sexual relationships between lawyers and clients, except those predating the lawyer-client relationship.
Virginia does adhere to the general Model Rule regarding
a conflict of interest.
a conflict of interest exists when
a lawyer’s representation of a client will be materially limited by the lawyer’s personal interests
the rules permit a conflict of interest to be waived if
1) the lawyer reasonably believes that the lawyer will be able to provide competent and diligent representation
2) and the client consents in writing.
even though Cate may have reasonably believed that she could confidently represent Phillip even if the sexual relationship soured, she should have
obtained his consent to the representation, after consultation, in writing.