crim law Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Dominion and control must exist for a period long enough to

A

have provided the defendant with an opportunity to cease dominion and control.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
1
Q

Knowingly or intentionally possessing a prohibited object (such as a felon possessing a firearm) is unlawful as long as the defendant exercises

A

control over the object.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

A principal is the person whose acts or omissions are

A

the actus reus of the crime, or, in other words, the perpetrator of the crime.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

An accomplice (i.e., an accessory before the fact or a principal in the second degree) is a person who

A

with intent that the crime be committed, aids or abets a principal prior to or during the commission of the crime.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

The difference between an accessory before the fact and a principal in the second degree is

A

presence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

An accomplice who is physically or constructively present during the commission of the crime is a

A

principal in the second degree.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

accessory before the fact is an accomplice that

A

1) is neither physically nor constructively present during the commission of the crime, but who,
2) with the requisite intent to encourage or assist in the commission of the crime,
3) provided verbal encouragement, financial assistance, or physical assistance to the principal
4) prior to the commission of the crime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

An accomplice is responsible for the crime to what extent?

A

the same extent as the principal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

If the principal commits crimes other than the crimes for which the accomplice has provided encouragement or assistance, then the accomplice is liable for the other crimes if

A

the crimes are the natural and probable consequences of the accomplice’s conduct.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

An essential element of proof of criminal conduct is

A

the mens rea, or the criminal intent to commit the criminal act, the actus reus.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

A defendant will remain liable for the commission of a criminal act, regardless of

A

if the intent was to harm an individual but accidentally hurts another.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

While specific intent is required for aider and abettor liability for specific intent crimes, there can be still be

A

aider and abettor liability for a crime which requires neither specific intent nor malice, such as for acts of negligence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

aider and abettor liability, for involuntary manslaughter involving negligence where the defendant showed

A

a common and shared purpose to participate in an act which resulted in death.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Felony murder is

A

1) murder of the first degree and
2) is defined as a murder committed in the commission or attempted commission of
3) arson, rape, forcible sodomy, inanimate or animate object sexual penetration, robbery, burglary, or abduction (kidnapping) except as otherwise provided in the aggravated murder statute.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Felony murder may be intentional or accidental, as long as

A

the death results from acts in furtherance of one of the enumerated felonies.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Robbery is a

A

common-law crime in Virginia.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

The elements of robbery as defined at common law are:

A

(i) the taking,
(ii) with intent to steal,
(iii) of the personal property of another,
(iv) from his person or in his presence,
(v) against his will,
(vi) by violence or intimidation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Typically, a principal in the first degree is

A

present at the scene of the crime.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

A principal in the second degree is a person who

A

is present at the commission of the crime and shares the principal in the first degree’s intent that the crime be committed or aids, abets, encourages, assists, or advises a principal in the first degree in the commission of the crime.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

In felony cases, every principal in the second degree may be

A

indicted, tried, convicted, and punished in the same manner as a principal in the first degree.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Even an accidental killing that results from the commission of a robbery can form the basis of

A

felony murder.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

purchase of illegal drugs is not one of the enumerated felonies that serve as a predicate for

A

felony murder.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

A person is guilty of conspiracy if he

A

confederates or agrees with another to commit a felony.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Virginia does not require an overt act to be performed to

A

complete a conspiracy; an agreement to commit a felony is sufficient.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

a defendant who has been tried and convicted of a substantive offense cannot be tried for

A

conspiracy to commit that same offense at a later trial

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

a defendant who has been tried and convicted of an offense he conspired to commit can be convicted of

A

both the substantive offense and the underlying conspiracy in the same trial.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Every unlawful homicide in Virginia is presumed to be

A

murder of the second degree.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

In order to rise to the level of first-degree or aggravated murder, the Commonwealth must make a prima facie showing that

A

malice or premeditation exists

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

if the commonwealth makes a showing of malice or premeditation

A

the burden of producing mitigating (heat of passion) evidence shifts to the defendant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Once the defendant has shown some evidence of a mitigating factor, the Commonwealth must

A

prove the absence of such factor beyond a reasonable doubt.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

murder of the first degree.

A

Murder by poison, lying in wait, imprisonment, starving, or any willful, deliberate, and premeditated killing not specified in the aggravated murder statute

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Mere presence and subsequent flight are not enough to convict a person as

A

a principal in the second degree.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

An accessory before the fact’s assistance to the principal may be

A

verbal encouragement, financial assistance, or physical assistance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

accomplices Mere knowledge that a crime will result

A

is not enough to be accessory before the fact

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

In felony cases, every accessory before the fact may be indicted, tried, convicted, and punished in the same manner as

A

a principal in the first degree.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

An accessory after the fact is a person who

A

knows a felony has been committed and thereby aids or assists a principal in the first degree or accessory before the fact avoid or escape prosecution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

An accessory after the fact is not subject to punishment for

A

the crime committed by the principal in the first degree or accessory before the fact.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

An accessory after the fact is subject to punishment for

A

(i) a class 6 felony in the case of a homicide offense punishable as a class 2 felony, or (ii) a class 1 misdemeanor in the case of any other felony, as long as he is not the spouse, parent, grandparent, child, grandchild, sibling, or servant to the principal in the first degree or accessory before the fact.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

Two or more offenses may be charged in separate counts of the same indictment or information as long as

A

the charges are based on the same act, transaction, or on two or more acts or transactions that are connected or parts of a common scheme or plan.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

The defendant must be tried for all offenses pending against him as long as

A

justice does not require separate trials and the offenses may be joined or the parties consent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

Embezzlement is

A

the fraudulent use, concealment, disposing of, or embezzling of any commercial paper or tangible or intangible property that was:
(i) received for another person or for one’s employer,
(ii) received by virtue of one’s office or employment, or
(iii) entrusted to one by another.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
41
Q

A person is guilty of conspiracy if

A

he confederates or agrees with another to commit a felony.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
42
Q

Virginia does not require an overt act to be performed to complete a conspiracy; however, such conduct may

A

support a finding of the existence of a conspiracy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
43
Q

A possession offense, such as possession of cocaine, does not require proof of actual physical possession of the prohibited object, but may be established by

A

constructive possession of the object.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
44
Q

Constructive possession may be proved by evidence of

A

acts, declarations, or conduct of the accused from which a fair inference may be drawn that he knew of the existence of prohibited object at the place where it was found.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
45
Q

For possession charges The defendant is not required to be aware that

A

possession of the object is illegal.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
46
Q

for a charge of felon in possession of a firearm, address

A

1) requires proof that defendant had previously been convicted of a felony.
2) Typically, a crime punishable by imprisonment for more than one year constitutes a felony.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
47
Q

conviction of forging a public record, a crime punishable by

A

a term of imprisonment of at least two years

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
48
Q

Entrapment is

A

1) the conception and planning of an offense by a law enforcement officer, and
2) his procurement of its commission by a defendant who would not have committed that offense except for
3) the trickery, persuasion, or fraud of the officer.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
49
Q

for entrapment the defendant must lack

A

any pre-disposition to commit the crime.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
50
Q

Entrapment can occur through the use of

A

an undercover agent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
51
Q

Entrapment will not bar a conviction when

A

the police merely afford an opportunity for the commission of a crime to a defendant willing to commit it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
52
Q

Accommodation:

A

A defendant may establish that:
1) he gave, distributed or possessed a controlled substance only as an accommodation to another individual
2) without an intent to profit thereby from any consideration received or expected
3) nor to induce the recipient or intended recipient of the controlled substance to use or become addicted to or dependent upon such controlled substance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
53
Q

accommodation wont apply to

A

an inmate in a community correctional facility, local correctional facility or state correctional facility

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
54
Q

This accommodation defense does not

A

absolve the defendant of the crime but can result in a lesser sentence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
55
Q

knowing possession:

A

1) Knowingly or intentionally possessing a prohibited object (e.g., drug paraphernalia, burglar’s tools) or a substance (e.g., illegal narcotics) is unlawful if
2) the defendant exercises control over such object or substance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
56
Q

A person commits common-law burglary if

A

he breaks and enters another’s dwelling in the nighttime with the intent to commit a felony or larceny therein.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
57
Q

For common law burglary, there is no need for the defendant to

A

engage in a destructive act to satisfy the breaking requirement, merely opening an unlocked door, will suffice; so long as (@ night + intent commit felony/larceny)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
58
Q

Upon motion of the Commonwealth, the court may order multiple defendants charged with participating in contemporaneous and related acts or in a series of acts constituting an offense jointly tried unless

A

a joint trial will prejudice the defendant.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
59
Q

if the commonwealth motions for a joint trial of defendants who participated + contemporaneous/related acts or series of acts, and prejudice is present, the court must

A

order the prejudiced defendant severed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
60
Q

severing a joint trial of multiple defendants is proper where

A

one crime is related/contemporaneous, but one defendant committed another unrelated crime close in proximity which other defendant had no involvement or knowledge of

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
61
Q

For the crime of malicious wounding, the intent required as is the case with other malice crimes is

A

a reckless disregard of an obvious or high risk that the particular harmful result will occur

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
62
Q

In Virginia, generally voluntary intoxication is

A

no defense for a criminal charge, even specific intent crimes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
63
Q

In order for voluntary intoxication to be a defense, it must produce

A

a permanent insanity

64
Q

Jury instructions are properly refused when

A

they are unsupported by the evidence

65
Q

In order for a defendant to claim self-defense after using deadly force they must be

A

without fault

66
Q

In Virginia, a person is not required to retreat before

A

using deadly force when they are confronted by an aggressor

67
Q

when the defendant provoked the violence

A

he must retreat as far as safely possible before using deadly force

68
Q

Once the provoking defendant has totally abandoned the original attack, they may

A

regain the use of force in self-defense

69
Q

Every unlawful homicide in Virginia is presumed to be

A

murder of the second degree.

70
Q

the Commonwealth must make a prima facie showing that malice or premeditation exists to establish

A

establish a murder with malice.

70
Q

in order to rise to the level of first-degree or capital murder, the Commonwealth must make a prima facie showing that

A

malice or premeditation exists.

71
Q

Virginia has no presumptions regarding

A

common law murder.

72
Q

Involuntary intoxication is a defense as long as the intoxication serves to

A

negate an element of general and specific intent crimes

73
Q

Voluntary intoxication is not a defense in Virginia unless

A

a person is so greatly intoxicated that he was incapable of deliberation and premeditation (two essential elements to prove capital or first-degree murder)

74
Q

A person is guilty of conspiracy if

A

he confederates or agrees with another to commit a felony.

75
Q

Virginia does not require an overt act to be performed in order to

A

complete a conspiracy; agreement to commit a felony is sufficient.

76
Q

withdrawal cannot be a defense to

A

conspiracy in Virginia

77
Q

Because there is no overt act requirement, the conspiracy was complete upon

A

their agreement to commit the crime.

78
Q

A criminal attempt requires

A

a specific intent to commit a criminal act coupled with a direct, but ineffectual act (an overt act) toward the commission of the intended crime.

79
Q

the overt act required for an attempt must be

A

1) well calculated to accomplish the result intended and
2) must approach sufficiently close enough to completion to amount to the “commencement of the consummation.”

80
Q

for an attempt offense, the overt act cant be merely

A

preparatory

81
Q

where a defendant abandons a roberry before its completed, but the specific intent and direct overt act toward commission are present, he cant assert abandonment because

A

the crime of attempted robbery was already complete when the overt acts toward commission of offense were made

82
Q

A conspirator can be convicted of both the offense of the conspiracy and crimes committed by any other co-conspirator in furtherance of the conspiracy if the crime is

A

reasonably foreseeable and a natural consequence of the conspiracy.

83
Q

in Virginia, robbery is

A

a common law crime

84
Q

The elements of robbery are:

A

(i) the taking,
(ii) with intent to steal,
(iii) of the personal property of another,
(iv) from his person or in his presence,
(v) against his will,
(vi) by violence or intimidation.

85
Q

by taking money, with the intent to steal, from the bank teller, against the teller’s will, by brandishing a gun; D completed the crime of

A

robbery

86
Q

a defendant can limit his liability for substantive crimes committed by co-conspirators by

A

withdrawing from the conspiracy

87
Q

In order to withdraw, the defendant must

A

give notice to his co-conspirators

88
Q

D does not provide effective notice of withdrawal and this defense will not be successful, where

A

D notifies co-conspirators after substantive crimes have been completed

89
Q

conspiracy only merges with the completed crime when

A

the defendant has already been tried and convicted of the substantive offense.

90
Q

A person commits abduction if he

A

1) by force, intimidation, or deception and without legal justification,
2) seizes, takes, transports, detains, or secrets another person
3) with the intent to deprive the other person of her personal liberty.

91
Q

forced the teller to move from behind the counter and lie face down on the floor while threatening her at gunpoint, constitutes

A

abduction

92
Q

In Virginia, offenses that are punishable by death or confinement in a state correctional facility are

A

felonies

93
Q

A Class 4 felony is punishable by

A

not less than two years and not more than 10 years imprisonment and a fine of not more than $100,000.

94
Q

forging a public record, a crime punishable by

A

a term of imprisonment of at least two years and a possible additional fine not exceeding $100,000.

95
Q

Possession of a prohibited object is unlawful if

A

the defendant exercises control over such object or substance; D must knowingly or intentionally possess the prohibited object to be guilty of possession.

96
Q

If a person “carnally knows” (which includes sexual intercourse) a child 13 years or older but under 15, he is generally guilty of

A

a Class 4 felony in Virginia

97
Q

If the child consents to sexual intercourse and the accused is a minor, the crime is reduced to a Class 6 felony if

A

he consenting child is three or more years the accused’s junior

98
Q

If the child consents to sexual intercourse and the accused is a minor, the crime is reduced to a Class 4 misdemeanor if

A

the consenting child is less than three years the accused’s junior.

99
Q

a minor can still be convicted of felony statutory rape if

A

the child does not consent or the consenting child is three or more years the accused’s junior

100
Q

Murder by poison is statutorily defined as

A

murder of the first degree in Virginia.

101
Q

Common-law arson is

A

the malicious burning of the dwelling of another

102
Q

The crime of arson is a malice crime requiring

A

a reckless disregard of a high risk of harm

103
Q

A mistake of fact must be reasonable in order to be a defense to

A

a general-intent or malice crime

104
Q

a mistake of fact can be a defense to a malice crime like arson if

A

the mistake is reasonable

105
Q

voluntary intoxication is a defense to specific-intent crimes if

A

the intoxication prevents the formation of the required intent

106
Q

voluntary intoxication is not a defense to

A

general intent crimes or crimes involving malice, recklessness, negligence, or for strict-liability crimes

107
Q

An accessory after the fact is

A

a person who knows a felony has been committed and thereby aids or assists a principal in the first degree or accessory before the fact avoid or escape prosecution.

108
Q

a principal in the first degree is

A

the perpetrator of the actus reus of the crime.

109
Q

Concealing a felon is insufficient to warrant conviction as

A

the principal in the first degree with respect to the felony committed by the felon

110
Q

a principal in the second degree is a person who

A

is present at the commission of the crime and shares the principal in the first degree’s intent that the crime be committed or aids, abets, encourages, assists, or advises a principal in the first degree in the commission of the crime.

111
Q

Concealing a felon after the felony’s commission is insufficient to warrant conviction as

A

a principal in the second degree

112
Q

an accessory before the fact must

A

aid, abet, encourage, assist, or advise the principal in the first degree before the commission of a felony.

113
Q

withdrawal cannot be a defense to

A

conspiracy in Virginia

114
Q

Felony homicide is murder of

A

the second degree in Virginia

115
Q

Felony homicide is

A

the killing of another accidentally or contrary to the parties’ intent, while committing a felony not enumerated in the capital murder and murder of the first degree (felony murder) statutes

116
Q

Virginia no longer recognizes

A

capital murder

117
Q

voluntary manslaughter is

A

an unlawful killing committed without malice, usually occurring in the heat of passion or in sudden mutual combat.

118
Q

A criminal attempt requires

A

the specific intent to commit a criminal act coupled with a direct but ineffectual overt act taken toward the commission of the intended crime.

119
Q

The overt act must be

A

well calculated to accomplish the result intended and must approach sufficiently close enough to completion to amount to the “commencement of the consummation.”

120
Q

Merely making arrangements or taking steps necessary for the completion of the crime only qualifies as

A

“preparation,” and not an overt act

121
Q

The underlying crime of robbery requires

A

taking, with intent to steal, the personal property of another, from his person or in his presence, against his will, by violence or intimidation.

122
Q

If a person uses, attempts to use, or displays a firearm in a threatening manner while committing or attempting to commit robbery, he

A

commits a separate felony offense.

123
Q

Because Jay cannot be convicted of attempted robbery, he cannot be convicted of

A

the attempted use of a firearm while attempting a robbery.

124
Q

An “Alford” plea is

A

a plea in which a defendant, without admitting guilt, admits that the Commonwealth has sufficient evidence by which the defendant could be convicted beyond a reasonable doubt.

125
Q

An accessory before the fact is

A

a person who encourages or assists another in the commission of a crime, but who is not present during the commission of the crime.

126
Q

In felony cases, an accessory before the fact may be

A

indicted, tried, convicted, and punished in the same manner as the person perpetrates the crime (i.e., a principal in the first degree).

127
Q

An accessory may be convicted whether or not

A

the principal is convicted, although it must be proven that the principal committed a criminal offense.

128
Q

Further, under Virginia law, an accessory before the fact will also be criminally liable for

A

any incidental crimes committed by a principal in the first degree in furtherance of any crimes they contemplated committing together

129
Q

The jury must decide whether the offense is

A

the natural and probable result of the intended wrongful act.

130
Q

Voluntary intoxication is

A

the intentional taking of a known intoxicating substance

131
Q

Voluntary intoxication is generally not a defense in Virginia, unless

A

the person is so greatly intoxicated that he was incapable of deliberation and premeditation in an aggravated or first-degree murder charge.

132
Q

Self-defense is

A

an affirmative defense in Virginia that, if established, results in an acquittal.

133
Q

for self defense, The defendant has the burden of introducing evidence of

A

justification (if the defendant acted without fault) or excuse (if the defendant was the initial aggressor).

134
Q

A defendant who is without fault may use self-defense when

A

he reasonably fears bodily harm by another and exercises reasonable force to repel the assault.

135
Q

A person may only use deadly force if there are reasonable grounds to believe

A

he was in imminent danger of great bodily harm or death at the time deadly force was used.

136
Q

If the defendant was the initial aggressor, he must

A

also completely abandon the original attack by retreating to the extent he can safely do so and making known his desire for peace by word or act.

137
Q

Specific intent crimes require that the defendant possess

A

a subjective desire, specific objective, or knowledge to accomplish a prohibited result

138
Q

Virginia’s Bad Check Law requires a person to act with

A

the intent to defraud and is therefore a specific intent crime.

139
Q

Virginia’s Bad Check Law

A

the intent to defraud must exist at the time that the check is made, drawn, uttered, or delivered

140
Q

Virginia’s Bad Check Law

A

The person must know at the time of such making, drawing, uttering or delivering, that the maker or drawer does not have sufficient funds in, or credit with, the bank.

141
Q

Virginia’s Bad Check Law also requires that

A

the check be given as “present consideration for goods or services.”

142
Q

A mistake of fact is a defense to a

A

specific-intent crime, even if the mistake is unreasonable.

143
Q

A defendant may not be placed in criminal jeopardy

A

twice for the same offense before the same sovereign (state or federal system).

144
Q

for use of a firearm in commission of felony, although there is no evidence that Defendant actually possessed the firearm

A

it is not necessary for the victim to actually see the defendant’s firearm in order to be charged, if defendant’s actions were suggestive of him possessing and using a firearm.

145
Q

Voluntary intoxication is

A

the intentional taking of a known intoxicating substance.

146
Q

In Virginia, voluntary intoxication is not a defense unless

A

a person is so greatly intoxicated that he was incapable of deliberation and premeditation, two essential elements to prove aggravated or first-degree murder.

147
Q

Voluntary intoxication is not a viable defense to

A

any other crime in Virginia.

148
Q

Virginia’s malicious wounding statute provides that a person must have the intent to

A

maim, disfigure, disable, or kill in order to be found guilty of malicious wounding.

149
Q

for voluntary intoxication to be a valid defense, there must be elements of deliberation and premeditation, and

A

the intoxication was so severe that he was unable to form the intent elements of deliberation and premeditation

150
Q

If a person intends to harm another person but instead harms a third person, the actor’s intent is

A

transferred to the third person under the doctrine of transferred intent.

151
Q

when transferred intent applies, it is irrelevant that

A

the harm to the unintended third person was accidental or unintentional

152
Q

A person is guilty of conspiracy if

A

he confederates or agrees with another to commit a felony.

153
Q

Virginia does not require an overt act to be performed in order to complete a conspiracy; however, such conduct may support a finding of

A

the existence of a conspiracy

154
Q

in virginia, for conspiracy, Agreement to

A

commit a felony is sufficient

155
Q

in virginia, withdrawal cannot be a defense to

A

conspiracy

156
Q
A