US involvement in vietnam Flashcards
When and what was the Geneva Accord? did the US accept geneva accord?
1954: between France and the Vietnam Minh → France would get out of Indochina, communism would rule in north of Vietnam, capitalism in the south, neither were to make military alliances with foreign powers, democratic elections for a single government for a unified Vietnam would occur in 1956.
rejected by new premier of south Vietnam and US → no communism.
elections in 1956 never happened bc they need HoChi Minh would win
How did Eisenhower start “nation building in south Vietnam” from 1954-1961(the years of Eisenhower’s presidency)?
Eisenhower introduced two new elements: SEATO (defensive military alliance) + engaged in “nation building” → supporting + encouraging Diem to create a new independent southern state.
Eisenhower gave Diem money, military equipment
What was Eisenhower’s approach to south vietnam?
eisenhower emphasised on military solutions rather than social and economic change
How did nation building and the Diem regime progress?
Nation building not going well
1960: Ho’s southern supporters + some opposition from Diem’s army (ARVN) rebelled against him
How did US involvement in Vietnam change when Kennedy became president?
1961-63: US provided even more money, weaponry, 20’000 advisers.
Ap Bac in 1963: 2000 ARVN troops accompanied by 133 personal carries, bombers, etc, refused to attack 350 Viet Cong. 5 helicopters were lost with 3 pilots and ARVN troops refused to do a rescue mission
Shows ineffectiveness of ARVN troops + tensions with US troops.
How and why was Diem removed from power?
1963: 10’000 Buddhist protested against their ban on religion → Diem sent soldiers killing 7 Buddhist and prompting others to burn themselves in protest.
Kennedy was very surprised → maybe he really didn’t know or maybe he was trying to deflect the blame off of him.
Dem rejected reform option + military option did not work → USA supported ARVN coup → Diem was killed by his generals.
Give two examples of how the nature of the war was changed when Johnson became president (1963-69)
1965: air strikes knows as “rolling thunder” → bombing routes taking men/materials to south Vietnam → decrease inflation in the north.
+ first American ground troops to Vietnam. 200’000 men by the end of 65 and over 500’000 by early 68.
Why did Truman get involved in vietnam?
Truman administration considered the French to be invaluable allies against communism in Europe and indochina → French confirmed that Ho was part of world wide communist theory → Truman responded positively to their request for aid.
What other reasons did Truman have to get involved in vietnam?
believed that what was at stake in Vietnam is the spread of communism rather than a Vietnamese war of independence. Communism expanding in Asia.
Truman also faced domestic political pressure for having lost China to communism according to republicans. The Truman state Department was more vulnerable after 1950 where McCarthy had convinced Americans that there were traitors in the truman Departement.
List 3 reasons why Eisenhower continued the US’s commitment to vietnam?
helped the French for same reasons as Truman but also bc the French were threatening to stop fighting in Vietnam without US aid and he did not want to “loose” Vietnam like Truman had “lost” china.
Eisenhower promoted the “roll back” of communism but failed to do so, so he better at least keep up with the “containment” policy of Truman.
1954: declared his domino theory
Why did Kennedy follow in Eisenhower’s footsteps?
also believed that communism searched for world domination and quoted the domino theory.
Greatly influenced by secretaries, such as McNamara, who believed in the US involvement in Vietnam → explained to him that the US had already committed to Vietnam before his presidency.
JCS warned Kennedy that any reversal of US policy would have disastrous effects with all relations in Asia.
He criticised Eisenhower for allowing the rise of communism in Asia → therefore he can’t have another defeat in Vietnam.
Why did Johnson continue with Kennedy’s foreign policies on vietnam?
believed in containment and domino theory → inherited involvement in war.
Patriotic and felt it was of national honour for the USA to continue its commitment in south Vietnam and to stick by SEATO.
Emotionally and constitutionally he felt bound to continue with the policies of the assisted Kennedy.
No one wanted past mistakes to be debated and so Johnson kept Kennedy’s advisers. the administration believed that they would somehow triumph. Johnson did not want to be the fist one to lose a war.
How did the war begin to escalate?
Johnson needed congressional support → real + imaginary attacks on US ships off the coast of North Vietnam led to the passing of the “Gulf of Tonkin Resolution”. → gave the power to do as he saw fit in Vietnam
American aircraft bombed north Vietnam for the first time. Escalation made Johnson look tough. → public approval rose from 42 to 72 percent helping him win the 1964 elections.
Diem’s successor was even less effective than diem in creating a viable south Vietnamese state. 1964: communist controlled half the country
What were the working group recommendations?
What were their 5 recommendations?
1964: working group created by Johnson to study Vietnam and make suggestions for future policies. Made up of experts in the defence department, state Department, CIA and JCS
And independent and anti communist south Vietnam was vital to the U.S.
Reiterated the domino theory.
Said American national prestige, honour, etc. was at stake.
Emphasised that escalation was necessary due to the Saigon government.
Suggested heavier bombing.
(AKA they told Johnson what he wanted to hear)
What is the quagmire theory?
US leaders became trapped in an expensive commitment unable to exit without losing credibility due to ignorance concerning Vietnam + overconfidence about US power + ideals.
Which shift did J.Schell (1976) point out?
a change from Eisenhower to Kennedy: the territorial domino theory became the psychological domino theory or the doctrine of credibility. (It wasn’t so much that other countries would become communist if Vietnam did but the US would lose credibility.)
How far do historians argue was Truman responsible for Vietnam involvement?
Vietnam war was not an American war during the Truman years according to David Anderson → argued that American dislike of French colonialism re +strained US involvement. However, Mark Byrnes (2000) argued it was the mindset of the Truman administration which ultimately led to the misguided war.