Unit 3 Flashcards

1
Q

What year did Sesame Street start?

A

1969

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What was the goal/target of Sesame Street?

A

-foster intellectual and cultural development in preschoolers -target academic skills and socio-emotional skills -for children from low-income and marginalized bgs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Why did Sesame Street mix the cartoon and muppets sections with human characters?

A

Research showed kids were most interested in cartoons and the Muppets -the human characters had tedious dialogue scenes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What did studies find in regards to Sesame Street?

A

Linked w/ academic skills –> school preparedness, cognitive skills, vocab -learning about the world, social reasoning & attitudes towards outgroups

  • can persist for long time -higher hs grades in math, science, and english
  • most impact for 3-5yr olds
  • no difference across international
  • little evidence on gender, but indication that bigger impact for girls
  • significant impact for low & mid SES -& high
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What population level effects did Sesame Street have?

A

-communities w/ SS had more kids in the right grade level (versus having kids behind a grade) -the presence of this 1 show effected academic level of children

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What did the study with Super Why prove? And what was the study?

A
  • effected literacy skills in children who watched it -improved -experimental study - randomly assigned kids of same level to watch SW or a science program - both went up but SW group went much higher
  • can’t teach grammar
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Can TV teach children?

A
  • yes, but depends on processing the narrative -then edu content comprehension -& distance
  • can teach literacy skills, socio-emotional skills, school preparedness -but can’t teach more complex skills such as grammar
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Does media rot your brain? And where does this idea come from?

A

No it doesn’t necessarily

-comes from Reduction Hypothesis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the Reduction Hypothesis?

A
  • consuming high amounts of media leads to poor academic achievement & will reduce academic abilities
  • no evidence to support this
  • there is a correlation *
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What concepts are included in the Reduction Hypothesis?

A
  • Time Displacement
  • Mental effort
  • Attention & impulsivity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the concept of Time Displacement (included in the Reduction Hypothesis)? & what are the findings? The exception?

A
  • you only have X amount of time in the day and media takes away from intellectually beneficial activities
  • but media actually displaces other media, not a reduction of intellectual activities
  • the exception - replaces reading for young children -impacts reading acquisition
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the concept of mental effort (included in the Reduction Hypothesis)?

A

media use is passive and causes passive thinking to become the norm

  • no data to support this
  • does not include the content, only the medium
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the concept of attention and impulsivity (included in the Reduction Hypothesis)?

A

shortens attention span and increases impulsive behaviour - causing a kid to struggle in an academic setting
-no research to support this

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Between Mental effort, attention & impulsivity, and time displacement, which have sufficient data?

A
  • time displacement has limited data

- both mental effort and attention & impulsivity don’t have enough data

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How can we explain the correlations btw amount of media use and academic achievement if there isn’t sufficient data?

A

a 3rd variable? -individuals who watch a high amount of media might be the type who struggles academically -or come from low socioeconomic households -parental involvement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the ‘Goldilocks’ theory when it comes to media use and academic achievement?

A
  • just right amount of media use to increase academic achievement, but too much will put you over the curvilinear pattern and you’ll start to do worse -positive correlation then peak then negative w/ heavy use
  • some say it’s 10hrs/wk others say 3hrs/wk -others say it varies by age
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Does content matter? Who’s theories does this relate to?

A

Yes it does. Kirsch says this. Goes against Marshall McLuhan the medium is the message

18
Q

What is educational media?

A
  • Incorporates educational objectives -ex. math, sharing, social skills, morals, reading
  • For all ages – often think young kids, but older kids too like Bill Nye
  • Have goals – try and teach X
  • Typically distinct from media used formally within schools to teach
  • Very common – kids 2+ spend an hour a day w/ educational media
19
Q

What is entertainment media?

A

-General content – general audience content

20
Q

Give two examples of studies (not named) done in regards to educational and entertainment media.

A
  1. -study took 2 groups 2-3yr olds & 5-7yr olds -3 types of TV - child audience: informative/educational -child audience: cartoons -& general audience -measured for 3yrs -predictions related to media consumed -tested reading, math, vocab, school readiness skills -found informative had a positive relationship (strongest in youngest group) & general content had negative correlation -cartoons had a weak negative correlation
  2. -study -took 5yr olds -2 media types -informative & ‘violence action/adventure’ (didn’t code for violence) -measured 10yrs later -grades -informative had positive (mainly for boys) -violent had negative (mainly for girls)
21
Q

What are some general facts about Sesame Street?

A
  • first screened educational show
  • founded and continues to be based on research
  • has it’s own curriculum
  • is now in 140 countries
  • started as an experiment & a dramatization of kids inner thoughts
  • 1/3 to 1/2 of preschoolers in US watched it
  • demonstrates cultural tolerance
22
Q

What is an empirical study?

A

observed and measure phenomena -actual experience not theory of belief -direct and indirect observation or experience -tend to control for individual differences in pursuit of universal effects

23
Q

What were the limitations of Alade & Nathanson’s study?

A

-needed more economically diverse & nationally representative sample -validity for measures of prior knowledge and interest (kids self-reported) -if short term memory distinct from working memory? need more clarity

24
Q

What was the overall conclusions of Alade and Nathanson’s paper?

A

-capacity model is a nuanced understanding of young children’s experience w/ edu TV -when guided by developmental theory and info processing theory -w/in context of individual differences

25
What is hierarchical multiple regression model?
-more variables added in separate steps -controls others to see whether adding variables effects model
26
Does interest effect narrative content comprehension or educational content comprehension?
-no -but hard to conceptualize interest -not a significant predictor of comprehension
27
What does effect narrative and educational content comprehension?
-verbal ability, short-term memory, prior knowledge related to narrative
28
Is the theoretical principle of narrative dominance supported?
-yes -verbal ability, short-term memory, and prior knowledge related to narrative had indirect influence on edu content comprehension
29
Generally do viewer characteristics effect narrative comprehension and educational content comprehension?
-yes -narrative comprehension mediates educational comprehension - but not interest -characteristics of short-term memory, verbal ability, and prior knowledge relating to the narrative effect
30
Are narrative and educational content comprehension different processes?
-yes but parallel
31
What is story schema theory?
prototypical story grammar that is present in most narratives – more closely a story corresponds to prototypical story structure the more easily ppl are able to understand & recall the story
32
Examples of program characteristics
a. Complexity of story, inferences, clarity of presentation, explicitness of content, temporal organization * clarity * complexity * speed/organization
33
Examples of viewer characteristics
a. Prior knowledge, story schemas, knowledge of formal features, interest, verbal reasoning ability, and short-term memory * memory capacity * verbal ability * prior knowledge * interest
34
What are the 3 governing principles of the Capacity Model?
- principle of narrative dominance - amount of resources available for processing edu is a function of resources being used to process narrative (if competing -given to narrative) - resources can be allocated voluntarily btw the 2 (default is narrative)
35
What is the principle of narrative dominance?
priority is given to the comprehension of the narrative over educational content -children allocate resources to processing narrative first b/c watching mainly for entertainment
36
In general what 3 things does learning from education TV depend on?
1. processing the narrative 2. education content 3. distance -btw edu content and story must be as close as possible (depend on working memory -ie the individual)
37
What is the capacity model?
various characteristics of viewers influence both narrative comprehension and educational content comprehension
38
What is moderate discrepancy?
Kids learn best when the content is a bit like what they already know but not exactly the same or completely different -ex. Blues Clues - bugs in the backyard instead of the jungle
39
Summarize Mares & Pan. Findings? Limitations?
- Sesame Street - meta-analysis -21 studies - 10,000 children across 15 countries - 3-6yr olds - significant effects stronger for 3-5yr olds (but both) - cognitive outcomes, learning about the world, social reasoning and attitudes towards outgroups - significant effects for all 3 - positive in low, middle (& high SES) - indication of stronger for girls - plausible causal effects - effective childhood educational intervention - limitations: -18 internal reports -can't assess report-level or study-level moderators -varied in context, location, year, type of pop, and outcomes assessed
40
Summarize Alade & Nathanson. Findings? Limitations?
- viewer characteristics - capacity model -viewer characteristics impact edu and narrative content comprehension -2 parallel process - 78 3-6yr olds children -most white, high income, and educated - watched Cat in the Hat -then completed assessments on prior knowledge, interest, verbal ability, and short-term memory (IV) - dependent v (narrative comprehension, education content comprehension) - all but interest were significant predictors - was looking at causal - limitations: no clear conceptualization of interest or prior knowledge -kids self-reporting -not economically & nationally diverse enough -working & short-term mem debate