Unipolar Depression: Contemporary Study Kroenke et al Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Aim

A

See how effective the PHQ-8 method in measuring depression in large population based surveys

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

IV

A

Whether respondent is classified as clinically depression using the PHQ-8 method

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

DV

A

Number of telephone respondents who were diagnosed with depression

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Sample

A

198,700 americans, from 38 different states

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Procedure

A

Participants filled out a questionaire, the data was then analysed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Procedure: What questionaire did they use

A

PHQ-8

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Procedure: What did the PHQ-8 method consist of

A

8 questions covering 8 of DSM-V symptoms

  • They were asked to give ‘number of days in the past 2 weeks’ they experienced the symptoms
  • Then they were allocated points based on the numbers they gave
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Procedure: How did the point system work

A

0 points for 0/1 days
1 point for 2/6 days
2 points for 7/11 days
3 points for 12/14

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Procedure: What are the 2 ways PHQ assesed current depression

A

Diagnostic algorithm method

Cutpoint method

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Procedure: How does the diagnostic algorithm method work

A

Diagnoses MDD for more than half the days on 5 or more symptoms

Any other depressive disorder on more than half the days on 2-4 symptoms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Procedure: How does the cutpoint method work

A

Defines depression if the score was 10 or more

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Results for Diagnostic algorithm method

A

4.3% were found to have major depressive disorder (MDD)

9.1% were found to have some form of depression

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Results for cutpoint method

A

8.6% of people had depression

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Conclusion

A

PHQ-8 method was useful in measuring population-based studies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Weakness of Kroenke et al generalisability

A

The sample used for the surveys may have been baised

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Weakness generalisability: Why might the sample be baised

A

The survey excluded people from institutions and people who did not have telephones.

  • These people might be the ones suffering the most from depression
17
Q

Weakness generalisability: What does this bais mean for results

A

study may have underestimated the true prevalence of depression

18
Q

Strength of application

A

Shows PHQ-8 can be used to arrive at an initial diagnosis through telephone interview or even online survey

19
Q

Strength of application: how can this help people

A

can encourage people to seek out help from doctors who can then make further diagnosis using DSM-V or ICD-10

20
Q

Strength of application: why is this a strength

A

Early identification can be cost effective and help avoid distress

21
Q

Strength of the reliability

A

It has a clear standardised procedures

22
Q

Strength of reliability: How is the procedure standardised

A

Used a well structured questionnaire and it was delivered by trained interviewers.

  • As they followed a protocol, the structure and experince of interview was the same for each participant
23
Q

Weakness of reliability

A

Asking questions over telephone creates realiability issues

24
Q

Weakness of reliability: Why does asking questions over telephone create issues

A

Some participants may not want to disclose their issues to a stranger.

  • participants may not answer on the 4 point scale, they might describe their experience instead of giving a number forcing researchers to make a subjective decision on a score