Unipolar Depression: Contemporary Study Kroenke et al Flashcards
Aim
See how effective the PHQ-8 method in measuring depression in large population based surveys
IV
Whether respondent is classified as clinically depression using the PHQ-8 method
DV
Number of telephone respondents who were diagnosed with depression
Sample
198,700 americans, from 38 different states
Procedure
Participants filled out a questionaire, the data was then analysed.
Procedure: What questionaire did they use
PHQ-8
Procedure: What did the PHQ-8 method consist of
8 questions covering 8 of DSM-V symptoms
- They were asked to give ‘number of days in the past 2 weeks’ they experienced the symptoms
- Then they were allocated points based on the numbers they gave
Procedure: How did the point system work
0 points for 0/1 days
1 point for 2/6 days
2 points for 7/11 days
3 points for 12/14
Procedure: What are the 2 ways PHQ assesed current depression
Diagnostic algorithm method
Cutpoint method
Procedure: How does the diagnostic algorithm method work
Diagnoses MDD for more than half the days on 5 or more symptoms
Any other depressive disorder on more than half the days on 2-4 symptoms
Procedure: How does the cutpoint method work
Defines depression if the score was 10 or more
Results for Diagnostic algorithm method
4.3% were found to have major depressive disorder (MDD)
9.1% were found to have some form of depression
Results for cutpoint method
8.6% of people had depression
Conclusion
PHQ-8 method was useful in measuring population-based studies
Weakness of Kroenke et al generalisability
The sample used for the surveys may have been baised
Weakness generalisability: Why might the sample be baised
The survey excluded people from institutions and people who did not have telephones.
- These people might be the ones suffering the most from depression
Weakness generalisability: What does this bais mean for results
study may have underestimated the true prevalence of depression
Strength of application
Shows PHQ-8 can be used to arrive at an initial diagnosis through telephone interview or even online survey
Strength of application: how can this help people
can encourage people to seek out help from doctors who can then make further diagnosis using DSM-V or ICD-10
Strength of application: why is this a strength
Early identification can be cost effective and help avoid distress
Strength of the reliability
It has a clear standardised procedures
Strength of reliability: How is the procedure standardised
Used a well structured questionnaire and it was delivered by trained interviewers.
- As they followed a protocol, the structure and experince of interview was the same for each participant
Weakness of reliability
Asking questions over telephone creates realiability issues
Weakness of reliability: Why does asking questions over telephone create issues
Some participants may not want to disclose their issues to a stranger.
- participants may not answer on the 4 point scale, they might describe their experience instead of giving a number forcing researchers to make a subjective decision on a score