types of attachment Flashcards
AO1 points
- development, aim and features of Strange situation
- procedure: 5 categories to judge attachment quality
- procedure: 7 episodes
- findings: secure attachment
- findings: insecure avoidant
- findings: insecure resistant
development, aim and features of strange situation AO1 (5)
- Mary Ainsworth
- assess quality of childs attachment to caregiver
- controlled observation
- lab
- 2 way mirror
procedure: 5 categories to judge attachment quality AO1 (5)
- proximity seeking - well attached infants stay close to CG
- exploration and secure base behavior - well attached infants are confident to explore and use CG as point of safety
- stranger anxiety: displayed by well attached infants
- seperation anxiety: displayed by well attached infants
- response to reunion w CG after seperation: well attached infants are enthusiastic
procedure 7 episodes AO1(8)
- each last 3 mins
1. child encouraged to explore by CG - tests exploration and secure base
2. stranger enters and talks to CG - tests stranger anxiety
3. CG leaves - tests seperation and stranger anxiety
4. CG returns, stranger leaves tests reunion behavior and exploration/secure base
5. CG leaves child alone -tests seperation anxiety
6. stranger returns - tests stranger anxiety
7. CG returns- tests reunion behavior
findings: secure attachment AO1 (5)
- Type B
- 60-75% of british toddlers
- happy to explore but seeks proximity w CG
- moderate stranger and seperation anxiety
- require and accept comfort from CG on reunion
findings: insecure avoidant AO1 (5)
- Type A
- 20-25% of british toddlers
- explore freely but doesnt seek proximity
- little/no seperation anxiety
- doesnt require comfort at reunion stage
findings: insecure resistant AO1(5)
- Type C
- 3% of british toddlers
- explores less and seeks greater proximity
- high stranger and seperation anxiety
- resists comfort when reunited w CG
AO3
❌ culture bound - imposed etic
- strange situation developed in USA
- based on western ideas of attachment behavior
- eg believe stranger + seperation anxiety show good attachment but in germany (individualistic culture) where independance is valued this may not be the case
✅ inter rater reliability
- multiples researchers discussing behavior behind 2 way mirror = no obsever bias
✅ lab study + operationalised behavioral categories + standardised method + babky dk they are being watched
- objective measurements
- easily replicated
- eliminated investigator effect
- bby behavior authentic no demand charac
❌ more attachment tupes have been identified
- minority of children dont fit in any of attachment types
- = disorganised attachment
- too simplistic