Topic 8 - EQ4 - Health, Human Rights, and Intervention Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What are some ways to measures human development (post-intervention?

A

-Life expectancy
-Provision of healthcare (doctors per 100,000)
-Literacy rate (% of population)
-Per capita GDP or GNI
-% with access to safe water and sanitation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are some ways to measure human rights (post-intervention)?

A

-Freedom of speech (human freedom index?)
-Gender equality (gender index?)
-Democratic elections
-Respect for minority groups
-Recognition of refugee status and asylum seekers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Why is it much easier to measure progress in human development in comparison to progress in human rights following a geopolitical intervention?

A

Human development is much easier to quantify (life expectancy is an undisputed number, literacy rate is a stat…) than human rights which are often measured using softer indicators (how do you quantify how democratic a country is? how do you quantify the treatment of refugees? how do you quantify or compare free speech?).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Why is it important to attempt to measure the success of geopolitical interventions?

A

Geopolitical interventions are expensive and politically sensitive so it is important for different bodies to prove the success of different projects.

Measuring success demonstrates accountability to the tax payer or financiers,

Measuring success can help highlight effective measures and where improvement may be needed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are 4 difficulties in measuring the success of geopolitical interventions?

A
  • Disagreement on what actually is success (China, USA and local people may all have completely different ideas)
  • Some countries do not have the facilities to collect or monitor data to measure success (especially if violence breaks out)
  • Many developments span over a long period of time and therefore are subject to circumstance change (e.g. MGDs)
  • Data collected can be interpreted differently by different people
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Has foreign intervention in Kyrgyzstan in the 2010s been economically and socially successful?

A

Not economically successful = negative change in GDP per capita

Socially successful = decreased child mortality, more primary education completion and more gender equality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Has foreign intervention in Ethiopia in the 2010s been economically and socially successful?

A

Economically successful = positive change in GDP per capita

Socially successful = decreased child mortality, more primary education completion, though marginally less gender equality+0.011 GII change

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is often a key goal for western geopolitical intervention?

A

The promotion of democracy and freedom for all in a country (e.g. minority groups). Was used to justify 2003 invasion of Iraq.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Why do many nations stress the importance of the promotion of democracy? (4 specific reasons)

A

It is believed that democratic institutions are building blocks for more secure and economically prosperous societies.

-A move from dictatorship to democracy can lead to economic growth and the advancement of women’s rights and wellbeing.
-It allows political and social stability meaning the countries are less likely to support militant groups
-It is easier for developed countries to create economic and military ties with democratic governments.
-Democratic countries are less likely to go to war (people don’t want it and govt held accountable;e)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Why is democracy a useful measure of success post-intervention?

A

The stability and growth often brought by democracy makes it a useful measure of success for IGOs and some governments, particularly following an intervention.

If an intervention results in the movement towards a stable democracy then it can often be seen as beneficial, whereas, if it does not or creates a power vacuum (e.g. Libya) then it is often seen as a failure by most Liberal Democracies and their IGOs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How else can democracy be promoted, other than through intervention (hint = £)?

A

Democracy aid.

Nearly all western goats now give democracy aid. In the late 80s, less than 1bn USD was spent on democracy aid yearly, now it is over 10bn.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What does democracy aid tend to focus on?

A

-Supporting crucial processes and democratic institutions, e.g. free and fair elections, the development of political parties, limiting the term of office of a country’s leader

-Strengthening and reforming government institutions, e.g. parliament and the judiciary

-Supporting civil society, e.g. freedom of expression, defending civil and political rights

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the relationship between ‘wealth’, ‘democracy’ and ‘ improved governnace’

A

Wealth + Democracy = Improved governance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

While IGOs and Western Governments favour democracy, often developing countries receiving geopolitical interventions favour what instead (this is their chief measure of success)?

A

Economic growth. They use this as their chief measure of success (not democracy).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Why is economic growth post-intervention important for countries?

A

An improvement in the economy will gain resources to improve infrastructure, health, education and environmental protections.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How is ‘aid for trade’ beneficial for both the donor and recipient country?

A

Recipient - improvement in the economy from aid will gain resources to improve infrastructure, health, education and environmental protections.

Donor countries - a prosperous country often becomes a beneficial trading partner.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What is aid for trade?

A

Aid given to a recipient country to allow them to develop skills, knowledge and infrastructure for economic growth in return increased global trade.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Which IGO supported better aid for trade in 2005? What did they say

A

WTO. It has encouraged countries to focus on developing trade strategies, negotiate better trade deals and build important infrastructure such as roads, ports and communication systems.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What evidence is there to show China has favoured economic growth over human rights?

A

China has seen economic liberalisation without social liberalisation or democratisation.

There is an argument that without the authoritarian government in China, that economic progress would not have been achieved. However, many Chinese people have seemed to accept the lack of human rights, such as restrictions to civil liberties, internment of Uighur Muslims into camps and detention of activists/dissidents, due to the increased wealth brought by government policy.

The CCP continues to control economic policy, ethnic relations, domestic security and even the internet.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What has been the environmental price of economic growth in China?

A

There has been massive environmental pollution and degradation of land across China (largely thanks to its expanding manufacturing industries).

This is alongside a persistent abuse of human rights too.

21
Q

What are the two opposing case studies for the mixed success of development aid?

A

Succesful - 2014 Ebola outbreak in W Africa (Liberia, Sierra Leone and Guinea)

Less successful - Haiti post-2010 earthquake

22
Q

What happened with the outbreak of Ebola in W Africa in 2014? What was int’l response?

A

-Disease discovered in 1976 but 2014 incarnation was deadliest occurrence (5x more deadly)
-First case of this incarnation reported in Guinea in March 2014
-18 months in nearly 12,000 reported dead in main countries of Liberia, Sierra Leone and Guinea (some deaths in Nigeria, Mali and USA)
-6 months post first case, UN Mission for Ebola Emergency Response set up to coordinate int’l responses of NGOs (e.g. MedSansFront) and to inform about disease
-UNMEER located and monitored people who had been in contact with the infected, they oversaw safe burials, established and equipped treatment centres for safety treatment, and organised transport of medical supplies, food (decreasing food supply and rising prices, closed borders…) and personnel

23
Q

How successful was the response to ebola (development aid) from the international community?

A

Thanks to UN Mission and National gov’ts there was a sharp fall in no. of new cases in first half of 2015.

BUT… no. of new cases stalled due to: fear of reporting infections to authorities, fatigue with 24/7 task of following precautions, denial and resistance from group of population that didn’t believe they needed to change their behaviour.

NEVERTHELESS… Ebola was effectively eradicated by mid-2016 with cooperation and commitment of NGOs and Gov’ts, as well as efforts of medical research scientists to come up with a vaccine (bodes well for future issues)

24
Q

What is/was the situation in Haiti?

A

Haiti has received aid for a long time, esp since 2010 earthquake, due to its extreme poverty. Key issue has been disease, sanitation and squatting/homelessness since 2010. There are a plethora of NGOs in the country with aid money totalling 3x the national gov’t budget.

25
Q

What have been the issues with development aid in Haiti?

A

-Huge dependency on aid amongst not only people but unrecovered gov’t (NGOs provide 70% of education and 85% of healthcare)
-Locals not consulted about what they need and want to get themselves off dependency cycle
-Small amount of aid money from 2010 made it to Haitians directly (2% of US $10bn pledge to Haitian NGOs and gov’t and 1% to Haitian business)
-Local jobs lost to aid workers
-Contrast between aid workers in new clothes and functioning cars and terrible conditions Haitian people live in

26
Q

How has development aid aided Botswana economically?

A

-In 1966 (newly independent from Britain) it was one of the poorest countries on Earth per capita. In first few years as a new nation it survived with 60% of govt expenditure coming from international aid and agriculture accounted for 40% of GDP
-Since 1966 has maintained one of world’s highest economic growth rates through fiscal discipline and sound governance
-Botswana transformed into a middle income country
-Exploitation of diamond resources has underlain most of this remarkable economic growth
-Botswana one of largest producers of diamond accounting for 1/3 of its GDP and 3/4s of its exports
-Tourism, financial services, subsistence and cattle farming are also significant to economy (reliant on these industries when diamond production levels off in coming years)

Development aid at the start helped kickstart a remarkable transformation story

27
Q

How has Botswana faired in regards to health?

A

-Prevalence of HIV/AIDS is second highest globally
-HIV threatens/overshadows economic gains
-UN estimates 1/5 people have it
-Dramatically cut Botswana’s life expectancy and orphaned thousands

Thanks to help of overseas aid, now has one of most advanced treatment programmes. Economic success has helped gov’t afford to make anti-retroviral drugs readily available and there have been movements to stop mother-child transmission.

28
Q

How has Botswana faired in regards to Human Rights?

A

Has reputation for speaking out against HR abuses in Africa (often one of only regional voices to do so). Far from perfect though…

-Same party in power for over 40 years and state control of media makes it hard for opposition parties to campaign equally
-Retains death penalty (for murder, assassinations and treason)
-Homosexuality criminalised and there is discrimination in the workplace on this basis
-Expressions of cultural diversity not encouraged
-Gov’t disposes bushmen from the lands and traditional water supplies in the desert to make way for large game reserves and more importantly, vast diamond field

29
Q

What are the superpower objectives of development aid?

A

Superpowers often use development aid as an element of their foreign policies, to strengthen links within the globalisation process (often supported by TNCs).

It can open doors, create a halo effect that donor countries can exploit for their own ends…

Aid is also rarely offered without strings attached (e.g. some Chinese neocolonialist projects in Africa). Trade conventions may also be used to promote certain countries and secure deals for trade.

30
Q

What is the case study for superpowers giving development aid for non-philanthropic purposes?

A

China and its African neocolonialism projects.

31
Q

What has been suspect about Chinese aid?

A

-China opted out of global reporting mechanisms established to coordinate aid and guarantee transparency

-China’s aid has been concentrated on infrastructure projects, perhaps to facilitate Chinese access to resources and transport such resources

-China’s provided more ODA (official development aid) to the African countries that support it in the UN and on the int’l stage

-China’s aid often concentrated in home regions of African leaders to open up possibilities of personal alliances

BUT

China also provides investment to wide range of social projects (not just infrastructure) and has been a positive influence where western aid has been withdrawn or absent.

32
Q

What is an example of Chinese social, infrastructure and resource projects?

A

Social - Rwanda - 12 member medical team with medical supplies and equipment supplied to Kibungo hospital

Infrastructure - Zambia - 930mil USD for power plant in Southern Zambia (been funding since 2010)

Resource - Bolivia - 340mil USD via a Chinese loan to cover 85% of costs of iron ore processing plant to be run by a Bolivian country

33
Q

What is our case study for a military intervention with differing short term and long term effects?

A

2003 Invasion of Iraq

34
Q

What were the short term effects of the invasion of Iraq?

A

-Saddam Hussein and his oppressive security forces removed
-Some early development projects succeeded (e.g. US funded vaccination programme helped reduce infant mortality by 75%)
-Democracy established and in 2005 Iraqis voted in the first free election in the country in 50 years

BUT

Clear that there were no WMDs (the basis for the invasion)

35
Q

What were the long term effects of the invasion of Iraq?

A

-Lack of long term planning by invaders left Iraq without the systems to restore security, foster democracy, protect HR or grow its economy
-Islamist militant groups (IS and Al Qaeda) with no previous established presence in Iraq took advantage of power vacuum and instability to establish themselves (fight for land still happening and minorities in the region like Yazidis and Christians are oppressed)
-Most Iraqis are Shia but Hussein ran a Sunni regime, animosity between two groups worsened in power vacuum and establishing a national govt with representation of both became impossible
-Corruption at all levels flourished
-Human Rights remain insecure post-Saddam (HR watch in 2015 found evidence of gov’t sponsored violations - kidnap/killing of sunni civilians by Shia forces, holding of prisoners without charge, restrictions on free speech, attacks on civilians by govt)

36
Q

What is the case study for a non-military intervention that improved both human rights and development?

A

Ivory Coast 2011 - UN Peacekeeping Force

37
Q

What was the conflict in Ivory Coast in 2011?

A

-North-South ethnic and religious divide with Muslim North and Christian South (North excluded from govt for long time and 2002 rebellion gave them right to vote)
-Controversial 2010 election battle between Ggabo (S) and Ouaterra (N) resulted in mass shootings and mortar attacks on streets from Ggabo supporters when he lost
-Democracy broke down and Human Rights being abused and concerns unrest could spill into neighbouring countries
-In 2011 1 million displaced, 147k refugees to Liberia, 12 day battle in capital (Abidjan) killed 3k

38
Q

How was 2011 Ivorian civil war resolved?

A

French special forces intervened and helped arrest Ggabo and he was handed to ICC in Den Haag on charges of crimes against humanity. They restored Ouattera to power.

39
Q

How was the Ivory Coast handled post-French intervention in 2011 (non-military aspect)?

A

In 2011 UN Peacekeeping Force moved in with the task of:
-Protecting civilians
-Bringing about disarmament; reintegrating warring factions into Ivorian society
-Monitoring and promoting farmers (UN provided seeds, tools and fertilisers to farmers)
-Humanitarian aid brought in for refugees and victims of war
-Ensuring establishment of new govt which would investigate HR abuses and disarm

40
Q

What does the Ivory Coast show in regards to how quickly things can change (for worse and better)?

A

Ivory Coast in 2010-11 showed how political stability and HR are often an easily breakable thin veneer by deep rooted ethnic, cultural or religious differences.

BUT ALSO…

Structural reforms have created an environment for economic growth, and the growth of agricultural industries key to the country. It is now in the top half of Africa for GDP per capita and has experienced some of the fastest economic growth rates in Sub Saharan Africa in the past decade. Successful 2021 elections respected by all and national reconciliation well underway. Though, far North is still dangerous with presence of Islamist militants…

41
Q

What are the two cases studies for a lack of action negatively impacting a country?

A

Zimbabwe and Rwanda

42
Q

What were the issues in Zimbabwe that may have led to a need for intervention?

A

-Zimbabwe under Mugabe (and Rhodesia) has had a history of systematic HR abuses against its own people
-Ranks 156th in HDI and poverty is huge and widespread

43
Q

Why was the international community reluctant to intervene in Mugabe’s Zimbabwe?

A

-Former British Colony until 1980 so Western nations (esp Britain) were sensitive to claims that intervention was colonial-esque
-Some countries in the region (e.g. New SA) argued that Mugabe was no threat to global peace and West reluctant to intervene without regional support
-Unlikely in 2010s because UN Security Council (China and Russia) unlikely to agree to interventions as Russia and China voted against an embargo and sanctions against Mugabe

44
Q

What were the social and political consequences of Mugabe’s presidency/premiership (from 1980-2017), and a lack of intervention, on Zimbabwe?

A

Social results:
-72% below nat poverty line
-Rural poverty increase with reliance on seasonal plantation work
-Life expectancy one of world’s lowest (59 for Men)

Political results:
-82% of govt budget allocated to govt salaries
-Widespread corruption (loss of govt budget)
-HR abuses regular with violence against political opponents
-Mugabe ruled Zim from 1980 to 2017!! (forced out)

45
Q

What were the social and political consequences of Mugabe’s presidency/premiership (from 1980-2017), and a lack of intervention, on Zimbabwe?

A

Social results:
-72% below nat poverty line
-Rural poverty increase with reliance on seasonal plantation work
-Life expectancy one of world’s lowest (59 for Men)

Political results:
-82% of govt budget allocated to govt salaries
-Widespread corruption (loss of govt budget)
-HR abuses regular with violence against political opponents
-Mugabe ruled Zim from 1980 to 2017!! (forced out)

46
Q

What were the economic consequences of Mugabe’s presidency/premiership (from 1980-2017), and a lack of intervention, on Zimbabwe?

A

-Crippling inflation and currency instability - hyperinflation reached in 2007 and peaked in 2008 causing switch from Zim Dollar to US Dollar

47
Q

What were the environmental consequences of Mugabe’s presidency/premiership (from 1980-2017), and a lack of intervention, on Zimbabwe?

A

-Dangerous levels of deforestation (top ten forest loss 1990-2010)
-Deforestation caused by rural poor cutting down trees for firewood by rural poor (no other options) and tobacco farming industry (nearly quarter of it)
-Gov’t laws to reduce tobacco deforestation were not enforced and tax on tobacco farmers (although collected) has not been distributed to farmers to reforest and regrow firewood (corruption led to tax money pocketed by politicians)

48
Q

What were the consequences of a lack of intervention in Rwanda in 1994?

A

Reluctance of UN, US and Belgian forces to intervene over fears of complications in PR with perceived ‘colinial-esque’ involvement and a disbelief that Hutus would ever actually do anything to Tutsis.

Hutus undertook a genocide against Tutsis in 1994 killing 800,000 in 100 days before current President Kagame’s Rwandan Patriotic Front (tutsi militia) defeated civillian and military authorities responsible for killing campaign. The UN stood by and only evacuated foreigners. Biggest thing UN did was implement an arms embargo on Hutu govt a month into the Genocide.