Theories of Religion Flashcards
name the 3 ways religion can be defined
- substantive
- functional
- social constructionist
outline evaluations of the substantive definitions of religion
- defining R in this way leaves no room for beliefs and practices that perform similar functions to R but don’t involve God
- the substantive definition also has a western bias of what R should be
outline the functional definitions of religion
- functional definition defines R in terms of social or psychological functions it performs for individuals/ society
- e.g. Durkheim: defines R in terms of its contribution to social integration
- the functional definition is inclusive to a wide range of beliefs + practices
outline the substantive definitions of religion
- these focus on the content/ substance of religious belief
- e.g. Weber defines religion as belief in superior power that is above nature + cant be scientifically explained
- sub. definitions draw a clear line between religious + non-religious beliefs, (religious beliefs include belief in God/ supernatural)
outline evaluations of the functional definitions of religion
- just because an institution helps integrate individuals, this doesn’t make it a R.
- e.g. collective chanting at a football game might give an individual a sense of integration, but that doesn’t make it a R
outline the constructionist definitions of religion
- social constructionists take an interpretivist approach that focuses on how members of society define R. they think its not possible to produce a single universal definition of R
- Ints research about how the definitions of R can be contested – e.g. Aldridge investigates Scientology and how several Govts have banned it
- constructionists don’t assume that R always involves a belief in God
(func) outline the functionalist view of R
- functionalists view R as a part of a system maintains social order + maintaining harmony
(func) outline Durkheim’s concept of totemism in R
- D believed that the essence of all R is founded through studying its simplest form – clan society. D studied Arunta, an Aboriginal tribe
- the clan consists of rituals worshipping a sacred totem which is the clan’s emblem (a design symbolising the clan’s origins/ identity)
- D argues that the clan’s worship of the totem is their worship of society
(func) name the 4 aspects Durkheim’s outlines on R
- the scared and the profane
- totemism
- the collective conscience
- cognitive functions of religion
(func) outline Durkheim’s concept of the scared and the profane in R
- a key feature of R is the fundamental difference between the sacred + the profane
- the sacred: things that inspire feelings of awe/ fear/ wonder + unite people into a single moral community - e.g. the bible
- the profane: things that have no significance; ordinary + mundane things
(func) outline Durkheim’s concept of cognitive functions of R
- D: R is a source of intellectual + cognitive thinking
- R is the origin of the concepts + categories we need for reasoning, understanding the world + communication - e.g. sacred/profane, right/wrong, good/evil
(func) outline Durkheim’s concept of the collective conscience in R
- sacred symbols represent society’s collective conscience (shared norms)
- shared religious rituals reinforce the CC + maintain social integration
(func) outline criticisms of Durkheim’s view of R
- the evidence of totemism is unsound – Worsley: notes that there is no sharp division between the sacred + the profane. e.g. different clans can use the same totem
- D’s theory is harder to apply to large scale societies with multiple religions as it doesn’t explain conflict between religions
- Postmodernists: argue that D’s ideas cant be applied to contemporary society as increasing diversity has fragmented the CC so there’s no shared value system for R to reinforce
(func) outline Malinowski’s psychological functions of religion
- Malinowski: agrees with Durkheim that R promotes solidarity
- but M thinks it does this by performing psychological functions, e.g. helping people cope with emotional stress
(func) what is the 1st situation where Malinowski thinks R performs a psychological role
1) the outcome is important but uncontrollable: Tobriand islanders
- lagoon fishing: safe + uses predictable, successful methods of poisoning – uses no ritual
- ocean fishing: dangerous + uncertain, always accompanied by ‘canoe magic’ (rituals to ensure success + safety) - gives people a sense of control + confidence + reinforces group solidarity
(func) how does Parsons say that R creates + legitimates society’s central values
- R creates + legitimates society’s central values by sacralising (giving value to) society’s central values
- this promotes a value consensus + social stability
- e.g. in USA Protestantism sacralised core American values of meritocracy, individualism etc
(func) outline Parson’s concept of values and meaning
- like Malinowski, Parsons sees R as helping individuals to cope with unforeseen events + uncontrollable outcomes
- P identifies 2 other functions of R:
1) creating + legitimising society’s central values
2) being the primary source of meaning
(func) how does Parsons say R is the primary source of meaning
- it answers ‘ultimate’ questions about society, like why the good suffer
- R provides the answers to these and so enables people to adjust to adverse events or circumstances + maintains stability
(func) what does Bellah say about civil religion
- Bellah: CR integrates society in a way that churches/ denominations (e.g. Catholicism) cannot
- CR claims the loyalty of all Americans as it attaches sacred qualities (R) to society itself (the state) - this unifies people in a multi-faith society
- it does this through traditions + rituals - e.g. national anthem + the phrase ‘one nation under God’
(func) outline the concept of civil religion
- a civil religion is a belief system that attaches sacred qualities to society, for example in the USA, CR is a faith in Americanism
(func) what is an evaluation of civil religion
- can CR actually be considered a R if its not based on a belief in the supernatural
(func) outline functional alternatives to R
- func alternatives are non-religious beliefs + practices that are equivalent to that of organised R
- e.g. reinforcing shared values / maintaining social cohesion
- for example, Nazi Germany had secular / non-R political beliefs through which they united society
(func) outline AO3 evaluations of Functionalist views of R
- Func ignores the negative aspects that R performs - e.g. oppressing the poor + women
- it ignores R as a source of divisions + conflict, esp in modern societies with multiple religions - they don’t always promote integration
- Parsons bases his ideas on singular R beliefs within a society rather than the pluralistic approach - e.g. in UK there aren’t shared beliefs
(Marx) outline the Marxist view of religion
- in the context of Marx’s general view of society (class divisions, capitalism etc), R is a feature of only class divided societies which maintains inequality