religion in a global context Flashcards
outline the characteristics of fundamentalism
- Fundamentalists: appeal to tradition + dwell on a ‘Golden Age’ of the past
- they seek a return to the basics/ fundamentals of their faith
- religious fundamentalism is different to traditional religion - RF only arises where trad beliefs + values of R are threatened/ challenged by modern society + esp by the impact of an increasingly globalised economy
- threat to trad beliefs can be external - e.g. through capitalist globalisation, rise of Western culture, military invasion
- can also come internally - e.g. when sections of society adopt new secular ideas, e.g. liberal attitudes to sexuality + gender
- there are 7 key features of fundamentalism
name the 7 key features of fundamentalism
1) Authoritative sacred text
2) ‘Us vs them’ mentality
3) Aggressive reaction
4) Use of modern technology
5) Patriarchy
6) Prophecy
7) Conspiracy theories
Aliens Usually Argue Under Purple Pineapple Clouds
outline Aldridge’s view of an authoritative sacred text as a characteristic of fundamentalism
- Aldridge: no text speaks for itself; it has to be interpretated - what Fundamentalists hold to be true isn’t the text itself, but their interpretation of its meaning
- they interpret the Bible solely as a set of historical facts + prophecies about the future, ignoring other interpretations of it as poetry, metaphorical, symbolic etc
outline an authoritative sacred text as a characteristic of fundamentalism
- for Christian Fundamentalists, every word of the Bible is true + valid for eternity + contains answers to all life’s questions - the text is inerrant (w/o error) + not open to questioning
- e.g. Christian Fundamentalism requires belief in the Virgin Birth of Christ, his divinity, his bodily resurrection from death - all of which are outlined in the Bible
- only those who accept these as historical facts are true Christians
- Fundamentalists are intolerant of all other views + refuse to engage in rational argument with them
outline an ‘us vs them’ mentality as a characteristic of fundamentalism
- Fundamentalists isolate themselves from the rest of the world + refuse to compromise with it
- Davie: they seek to establish islands of certainty against what they see as social + cultural chaos
outline aggressive reactions as a characteristic of fundamentalism
- Fundamentalist movements aim to draw attention to the threat to their beliefs + values, so their reactions are aggressive + intended to shock, intimidate or cause harm
- authoritative leaders, e.g. clergy + elders, who interpret the sacred text, are important in giving direction to the reactions
outline use of modern technology as a characteristic of fundamentalism
- although Fundamentalists oppose modern culture, which they see as corrupted by secularism, liberalism, materialism etc, they are keen to use modern technology to connect + recruit people
- e.g. joining extremist organisations, e.g. ISIS
outline the prophecy as a characteristic of fundamentalism
- Christian fundamentalists proclaim the relevance of biblical prophecies to modern day events
- they believe that the ‘last days’ / day of judgement will soon by upon us, the only way to be protected is through faith
outline the patriarchy as a characteristic of fundamentalism
- Hawley: fundamentalists favour a world in which control over women’s sexuality, reproductive powers, and their social economic roles, is fixed for all time by divine decree
outline fundamentalism and modernity
- Davie: fundamentalism occurs when traditional orthodox beliefs + values are threatened by modernity - thus, fundamentalists are a product of modernity
- Giddens: F is the product of/ reaction to globalisation, which undermines trad social norms of the family, gender etc - e.g. prohibition of sex before marriage
- in late modern society, inds are constantly faced with choices, uncertainty + risk - fundamentalism promises rigid, dogmatic beliefs + certainty
outline conspiracy theories as a characteristic of fundamentalism
- Fundamentalists are often attracted to conspiracy theories; the idea that powerful, hidden, evil forces + organisations are in control of human destiny
- Rs people conspire against groups to make them scapegoats - e.g. homosexuals
- Aldridge: some extreme Christian + Islamic fundamentalists hold antisemitic conspiracy theories that believe Jews are conspiring to achieve world domination
outline cosmopolitanism
- Giddens: contrasts fundamentalism with cosmopolitanism (a way of thinking that embraces modernity + globalisation)
- cosmopolitanism is tolerant of others’ views, open to new ideas, constantly reflects on + modifies beliefs with society (‘reflexive thinking’)
- it requires people to justify their views through use of rationality + evidence rather than sacred texts
- one’s lifestyle is seen as a personal choice rather than something prescribed by a religion
- C religion + spirituality emphasises the pursuit of personal meaning + self-improvement
outline responses to postmodernity
- Bauman: sees fundamentalism as a response to postmodernity
- PM society brings freedom of choice uncertainty, + heightened awareness of risk - undermining old uncertainties grounded in tradition
- Castells: distinguishes between 2 responses to postmodernity
outline AO3 evaluations of Giddens + Bauman + Castells
Beckford criticises Giddens, Bauman + Castells on several grounds;
- they distinguish too sharply between cosmopolitanism + fundamentalism - ignore hybrid movements
- they are ‘fixated on fundamentalism’ + ignore other important developments - e.g. how globalisation is also affecting non-fundamentalist Rs altogether
- Giddens lumps diff types of fundamentalism together, ignoring important differences between them
- Haynes: we shouldn’t focus on the idea that Islamic fundamentalism is a reaction from globalisation - is often due to failure of elite to improve standard of living
outline Castells 2 responses to postmodernity
- Castells distinguishes between 2 responses to postmodernity;
1) resistant identity: a defensive reaction from those who feel threatened + retreat into fundamentalist communities, e.g. Amish community
2) project identity: the response of those who are forward-looking + engage with social movements, e.g. Feminism
outline monotheism and fundamentalism
- Bruce: the main cause of F is the perception of R traditionalists that today’s globalising world threatens their beliefs
- however, Bruce views F as too confined to monotheistic Rs (believing in 1 God) - there are also polytheistic Rs (believing in many Gods), e.g. Hinduism, which are unlikely to produce F
why are polytheistic religions less likely to produce fundamentalism
- Bruce argues its because MRs are based on a notion that God’s will as revealed through an authoritative sacred text - e.g. Bible
- whereas PRs lack a single, all powerful deity/ a single text, and so there is more scope for different interpretations + none have an over-riding claim to an absolute truth
outline the two fundamentalisms
- Bruce argues that while all fundamentalists share the same characteristics, e.g. belief in the literal truth os a sacred text, different fundamentalist movements may have different origins
- some are triggered by changes within society, while others are a response to changes imposed externally
- Bruce illustrates this with examples of Christian and Islamic fundamentalism with the West and developing countries
outline Bruce’s view of the two fundamentalisms in developing countries
- in developing countries, fundamentalism is usually a reaction to changes being thrust upon society externally - e.g. in the Islamic Revolution in Iran
- F is triggered by modernisation + globalisation in which ‘Western’ values are imposed by foreign capitalism or by local elites supported by the West
- here, F involves resistance to the states attempts to side line it/ confine it to the private sphere
outline Bruce’s view of the two fundamentalisms in the West
- in the West, fundamentalism is often a reaction to change taking place within society, esp the trend towards diversity + choice
- e.g. the New Christian Right in America has developed in opposition to family diversity, sexual promiscuity, gender equality + abortion etc
- it aims to reassert ‘true’ religion + restore it to a public role where it can shape the laws + morals of society
outline secularisation + fundamentalism
- alternatively, Davie: argues that recent decades have seen the emergence of secular forms of fundamentalism
- D links this to changes in the nature of modern society + distinguishes between 2 phases of modernity
- Davie concludes that both R + secular movements can become fundamentalist as a result of greater uncertainties of life in late/postmodern society in which reasserting truth + certainty is increasingly sought after - e.g. EDL
outline Davie’s 1st phase giving rise to religious fundamentalism
- 1st phase: Enlightenment;
- Enlightenment Era from the 1700s helped secularise society + inc belief in power of science + rationality to improve the world
- this Enlightenment Project dominated European thought + helped secularise all areas of social life, attacking + undermining religious certainties
- R fundamentalism is one reaction to this secularisation process
outline Davie’s 2nd phase giving rise to secular fundamentalism
- 2nd phase:
- since the 70s, the optimism of the Enlightenment project has come under attack - the result of a growing mood of pessimism + loss of faith in major secular ideologies, e.g. Liberalism, whose claims to truth + belief in progress have been undermined
- this mood is the product of the insecurity caused by changes, e.g. globalisation, environmental concerns
- Ansell: cultural racism is increasing in disguise - or not, e.g. English Defence League
outline the result of secular fundamentalism
- as a result, these secular ideologies are struggling for survival, just like trad R - D says they are ‘past their sell-by date’
- as with R when it came under attack, some supporters of secular ideologies, e.g. nationalism, have also been attracted to fundamentalism
- e.g. the disintegration of communist Yugoslavia in the 90s led to a secular nationalist fundamentalism that justified ethnic cleansing of territory to create a separation (us vs them)