Family Diversity Flashcards
what do Functionalists (Parsons) say about the nuclear family
- Parsons: there’s a ‘functional fit’ between the NF + modern society
- P says the NF is uniquely suited to meeting the needs of modern society; performs 2 functions (primary socialisation, stabilisation of adult personalities) which contribute to the stability and effectiveness of society
- other family types can be considered dysfunctional, abnormal as they’re less able to perform the required functions of the family
what do The New Right say about the nuclear family
- the only correct family type is the NF with a clear cut division of labour between the breadwinner husband and homemaker wife
- this family type is natural + based on fundamental biological differences
outline the New Right’s view on family diversity
- has a conservative + anti-feminist view of the family; they firmly oppose family diversity
- the decline of the traditional NF/ rise in family diversity is the cause of many social issues
- NR especially opposes lone parent families as they see them as harmful to the children
outline the New Right/ Benson’s view on cohabitation vs marriage
- the main cause of LPFs is the collapse of relationships between cohabiting couples
- only marriage can provide a stable environment to bring children up in
- Benson: married couples are more stable as it requires deliberate commitment to one another - cohabitation allows partners to avoid commitment + responsibility
- Benson: Gov needs to encourage more couples to marry through policies
what are the 3 ways in which lone parents are harmful to children
- LMs cant discipline their children properly
- LPFs leave boys w/o a male role model; results in failure in education, delinquency
- LPFs are also more likely to be in poverty; thus a burden on the state
outline AO3 evaluations of The New Right ideas
- Oakley: NR assumes husbands+ wives’ roles are fixed through biology, however among diff cultures, there’s great variation in the DoL
- feminists: the conventional NF is based on the patriarchal oppression of women + is a fundamental cause of gender inequality
- there’s no correlation between children in LPFs and delinquency
outline Chester’s neo-conventional family
- he doesnt regard the rise in family diversity as significant or negative - its increase has been exaggerated
- the important shift is from the traditional NF to the neo-conventional family
- neo-conventional family: a dual-earner family in which both partners work
what does Chester say about household composition statistics
- household composition statistics only show a single snapshot of a single moment and so are misleading
what are Chester’s 5 points of evidence that the rise in family diversity has been exaggerated
- most live in household headed by a married couple
- most adults marry + have children. most children are reared by 2 parents
- most marriages continue till death
- cohabitation has increased - but for most its a temporary phase until marriage
- although births outside marriage has increased, most are jointly registered - indicating that the parents will bring up the baby up as a couple
what do the Rapoports say about family diversity
- society has moved away from the traditional NF to a range of different family types
- British families have adapted to a pluralistic society in which lifestyles + uculture is more diverse
- fam diversity reflects greater freedom of choice and is a positive thing that reflects peoples different needs
- there are 5 different types of family diversity
name the Rapoports 5 types of family diversity
1) organisational diversity (how roles are perfomed/ by who)
2) cultural diversity (differing beliefs and values)
3) class diversity (life will differ depending on wealth)
4) life stage diversity (your fam structure will differ depending on your life stage)
5) generational diversity (ideas/ norms about family change over time)
what do Modernists say about family diversity
- individuals have no real choice and are predictable
- most people date, marry, have kids etc
- there’s limited variety in family life
what do Postmodernists say about family diversity
- Cheal: we no longer live in a modern society with its orderly structures; society has entered a new chaotic postmodern stage
- in PM society; there’s no longer one single dominant family type such as the NF
- instead family types have become fragmented into diff types. individuals now have more choice in their lives
- there are advantages + disadvantages; gives inds more freedom to plan their own life course, but greater freedom means greater instability
what does Stacey say about Postmodern families
- Stacey: greater freedom + choice has benefitted women as it enables them to be free from the patriarchal oppression + to shape their family to their needs
- she found that women were the main agents of change within the family
- e.g. many W reject the traditional housewife role
- one of the new family structures were ‘divorce-extended families’ - whose members are connected by D - e.g. the new partners of former husband
outline the Individualisation Thesis
- Giddens + Beck: explore effects of increasing individual choice upon families and relationships (Individualisation Thesis)
- traditional structures like gender, class, have lost influence
- in the past, peoples lives were defined by fixed roles that prevented them from choosing their own life course. today, individuals have less fixed roles to follow
- we have become ‘disembedded’ from traditional roles/ structures, leaving us with more freedom in how we lead our lives