The Embassy of Cambodia Flashcards
Plot of The Embassy of Cambodia
Summary
- Protagonist: Fatou, a migrant domestic worker in Willesden, London
Key Events:
- Fatou secretly uses her employers’ pool membership
- She saves their child’s life but is still dismissed
- She develops a connection with Andrew but does not truly love him
- The Embassy of Cambodia remains mysterious and inaccessible
Ending:
- Open-ended, reflecting Fatou’s continued struggle and lack of clear resolution
- The badminton match metaphor highlights a power imbalance
Characters and Their Roles
Fatou
- Round but static character → she is fully developed but does not change significantly
- Outsider → in her workplace, at the health club, even in her friendship with Andrew
- Foil to Andrew → she is struggling, he is privileged but unaware of it
- Represents → postcolonial subjects, the invisibility of migrant workers
Andrew
- Foil to Fatou → has intellectual confidence but lacks real struggle
- Complementary character → provides Fatou with conversation but no real help
- Sees himself as supportive but remains self-absorbed
The Derawals (Employers)
- Hierarchically above Fatou → take her passport (identity, agency)
- Used to struggle as immigrants but now part of the privileged class
- Insensitive → Dismiss her despite her life-saving act
Narratology in The Embassy of Cambodia
Two main narrators:
The balcony narrator (1st person, external, teller mode):
- Uses 1st-person plural (“we”), acting as a collective voice of Willesden’s residents.
- Appears omniscient but is actually limited in knowledge.
- Functions like a Greek chorus, observing but not intervening.
Fatou’s narrator (3rd person, internal, reflector mode):
- Provides insights into Fatou’s thoughts but keeps a certain distance.
- Sometimes feels like an omniscient narrator, but also reflects Fatou’s own perspective.
Genette’s Narrative Framework
Homodiegetic vs. Heterodiegetic:
- Balcony narrator = homodiegetic (part of the story).
- Fatou’s narrator = homodiegetic/heterodiegetic (if Fatou then homo, if not then hetero).
Extradiegetic vs. Intradiegetic:
- Balcony narrator is extradiegetic (above the story, commenting).
- Fatou’s narrator might be intradiegetic if seen as a constructed narrative.
Focalization:
- The balcony narrator pretends to be omniscient, but is actually internal focalized (limited by what they can observe).
- Fatou’s sections have zero focalization (omniscient) but sometimes shift to internal focalization (Fatou’s thoughts).
Why is it so complex?
- Mirrors the theme of invisibility and power dynamics: Who tells Fatou’s story? * Who gets to control the narrative?
- Creates distance between the reader and Fatou, making her struggles feel both close and unreachable—just like how the Willesden residents view her.
Metaphor: Badminton as a Symbol
Badminton as a Metaphor for Power Struggles
The game symbolizes Fatou’s struggles in life.
- She only watches, never plays → symbolizes her lack of agency.
- The match is one-sided: “One player could imagine only a violent conclusion, and the other only a hopeful return.”
- Fatou = the hopeful player (trying to survive, looking for hope).
- Society/colonial system = the violent player (dominates, strikes without mercy).
Scoreboard format of the chapters:
- Suggests an ongoing battle where Fatou is always losing.
- Reflects social inequality: some people (like the Derawals) always “score”, while others (like Fatou) never do.
Colonial undertones:
- A sport often associated with British colonial leisure → reinforces the colonizer vs. colonized theme.
- Fatou is captivated by the game, despite her own struggles.
- Represents distraction and false hope → she is mesmerized by something that will never help her.
Metaphor: The Embassy as a Symbol
The Embassy as a Place of Privilege and Exclusion
- Fatou sees the embassy, but never enters → symbolizes her outsider status.
- The embassy is physically present but completely isolated, just like Fatou.
- People enter and exit the embassy, but Fatou remains stagnant, much like how immigrants are stuck in social hierarchies.
Comparison Between the Embassy and Fatou’s Life
- Embassy = symbol of power and inaccessibility → Fatou is also invisible and powerless.
- The woman exiting the embassy carries shopping bags → suggests normalcy and privilege, which contrasts with Fatou’s reality.
- Historical reference: The Khmer Rouge regime in Cambodia (1970s genocide) → parallels how the world ignored suffering (just like Willesden ignores Fatou).
Postcolonialism in The Embassy of Cambodia
Colonial Power Structures Persist
- Fatou depends on the Derawals and Andrew, mirroring colonial hierarchies.
- The Derawals, once immigrants, now exploit her, showing how oppression continues.
- Fatou’s confiscated passport symbolizes erased identity, a colonial legacy.
Invisibility of the Oppressed
- Fatou is trapped in domestic servitude but remains unseen.
- The embassy = global power, distant and indifferent, much like Britain’s colonial past.
Cambodia as a Parallel
- The Khmer Rouge genocide was ignored, just as Fatou’s struggles are.
- Highlights ongoing postcolonial oppression, even in modern societies.
Postcolonial Hierarchies
- The Derawals = “New People” who now uphold oppression.
- British locals = “Old People” who feel threatened by immigrants.
- Shows how colonial power shifts but never truly disappears.