test 8 VAD indications, design, and comparing pump types Flashcards
Three different uses for VADs
Bridge to Recovery (BTR)
Bridge to Transplant (BTT)
Destination Therapy (DT)
Bridge to Transplant
Worsening hemodynamics despite high level of IV inotropic support and/or vasodilator therapy or refractor arrhythmias.
Destination Therapy
Patients who are not transplant candidates. Have an EF less than 25% and NYHA Class IV symptoms despite optimal therapy.
VAD Contraindications
High surgical risk Recent/evolving stroke Neurological deficits impairing the ability to manage device Coexisting terminal condition Abdominal aortic aneurysm (greater than 5 cm) Active infection Fixed pulmonary hypertension Severe pulmonary dysfunction Multisystem organ failure Inability to tolerate anticoagulation HITT Psychiatric illness Lack of social support pregnancy
VAD design
Devices need to be configured for their eventual application
Shorter term versus partial assist versus long term support versus total support.
Different uses and device requirements impact design.
Anatomically compatible
Used over large variations in body mass, chest size/ shape, abdominal girth, etc.
Structurally stable in a corrosive saline environment
Operate continuously without regular maintenance for years.
Cannot fail under increased stress conditions
Reduce power requirements to save battery life
Must be efficient – reduce heat waste.
3 different kinds of pumps for VADs
Positive displacements
Usually pneumatic
Rotary
Centrifugal
Flow and Pressure comparisons for
Positive displacement:
Rotary/ Centrifugal:
Positive Displacement: Change volume in the chamber
Rotary/ Centrifugal: Rotating Impeller
Source of Energy comparisons for
Positive displacement:
Rotary/ Centrifugal:
Positive Displacement: Air pressure/ Electricity
Rotary/ Centrifugal: Electricity
Size comparisons for
Positive displacement:
Rotary/ Centrifugal:
Rotary is smaller with a smaller cannula
Centrifugal can be placed in pericardium!
Prime Volume comparisons for
Positive displacement:
Rotary/ Centrifugal:
Positive Displacement: Large Prime Volume
Rotary/ Centrifugal: Smaller Prime Volume
Flow Ranges comparisons for
Positive displacement:
Rotary/ Centrifugal:
Both plagued with thrombosis with decreased flow and hemolysis with increased flow
Afterload comparisons for
Positive displacement:
Rotary/ Centrifugal:
Positive Displacement: Unaffected by changes in afterload
Rotary/ Centrifugal: Flow drops with increased SVR
Preload comparisons for
Positive displacement:
Rotary/ Centrifugal:
Positive Displacement: Passive filling, output follows venous return
Rotary/ Centrifugal: Flow increases with increased VR, but no active suction applied