Test 7 Flashcards

1
Q

When are reversal designs undersirable

A

when treatment variables are not able to be withdrawn due to ethical, practical, staff limitations.
-no0t good to do when using multiple bx

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is a multiple baseline design

A

Same treatment is applied sequentially across; behaviours, subjects, or settings
-BL is started at the same time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is meant by independence of behaviour is not found

A

the effects of the treatment variable are general rather than specific

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What do you do when independence of behaviours is not found

A
  • include BL that are topographically distinct from one another (difficult on a priori bases)
  • use 4 or more BL rather than 2-3
  • withdrawal and reintroduce treatment (BAB) therefore demonstrating the controlling effects over the response.

Include baselines that are topographically distinct from one another
Use 4 baselines
Use withdrawal design within multiple baseline

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How many BL should be used in a multiple baseline

A

-at least two, preferably 3, 4 or more increase the strength of design.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the three basic types of multiple baseline designs

A

Behaviors
Subjects
Settings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the major problems with self report data

A
  • it is not always accurate (eg deviate bx alcohol vs not)

- accuracy and Validity is suspect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what is meant by independence of target behaviours

A

Behaviors should be functionally similar but independent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what is a simultaneous replication design

A

A group multiple baseline-simultaneous replications treatment design is described that establishes experimental control within a single ongoing training group by combining group treatment with behavioral assessment of each S following each group session

-do group therapy but take data on each participant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what is a non concurrent multiple baseline design

A

When you can’t start baseline at the same time, i.e. not all 3 subjects were identified at the same time or enrolled in services
Need to have differing lengths of baseline
Can not introduce treatment on the same day regardless of length of baseline, intervening variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Why is a multiple baseline not well suited for drug research

A

-because the drug will have the same effect across multiple behaviours when administered.

+
Multiple baseline across subjects could be used, across behaviors and settings inappropriate
Multiple baseline with different drugs could be used
Multiple baseline could provide additional methodology to study drug effectiveness rather than control and placebo group designs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

SA why

A

previous research has not shown gen

  • SA is more common in these pop
  • used in situ training following bST
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

SA Subjects

A

5 women

ID but verbal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

SA target Bx

A

trained to use SA prevention skills in response to situations acted out

  • doesn’t agree or comply
  • says no or other verbal refusal
  • leaves or tells them to leave
  • reports incident
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

SA assessment

A

asked subjects how they would respond in various situations

  • role played
  • gen tested via in situ
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

SA IOA

A

2 observers

100%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

SA experimental conditions

A

BL: same as assessment
Training:BST (presentation of info, discrimination, instructions, rehearsal in role play, praise for CR, feedback for IR, multiple exemplars used)
R+ fast food coupons FR10
In Situ training: 1 week later tested. If lower than a 4 training began.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

SA In situ training

A

They first asked the subject what the confederate had asked her to do and what her response was. They then told her the correct response, modeled it for her, and reenacted the assessment sce- nario in a role play. If the subject exhibited the correct response in the role play, she re- ceived praise. If the subject exhibited the in- correct response, the trainers used instruc- tions and modeling to prompt the correct response. Training continued until the sub- ject made the correct response in two role- play situations without prompts. Within 3 days, another in situ assessment was con- ducted, and in situ training was repeated un- til three consecutive assessments resulted in scores of 4.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

SA follow up

A

One month following the com- pletion of in situ training, an in situ assess- ment was conducted. If the subject received a score of 4, her participation in the study was finished. If the subject received a score lower than 4, in situ training sessions were conducted until the subject achieved a score of 4 on a subsequent in situ assessment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

SA results

A

The results of this investigation show that a 10-week behavioral skills training program resulted in the acquisition of sexual abuse prevention skills, but that the skills did not fully generalize to in situ assessments
-did occur in the naturalistic context once in situ training had been conducted, both im- mediately and 1 month after training.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

SA future research

A

Should further look at M and G.

-other ppl

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

GC why

A

not always access to R+

  • Some teachers aren’t good at social praise
  • want to use naturally occurring privileges
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

GC subjects/setting

A

4th grad, 24 kids, 7 problem behaviours

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

GC DV

A
  • observed 1hr 3 days a week
  • interval recording 1m
    1) out of seat behaviour - leaving during session without permission
    2) talking out behaviour - talking/whispering without permission
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

GC IOA

A
2nd observer at least once per condition
agreements over total intervals time 100
also calculated whether teacher attention was given*
-out of seat 91%
-talking out 86%
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

GC game

A

teacher explained
-they were about to play a game
-class will be divided into two teams
-whichever team won would receive a privilege
-there were rules that had to be followed to win
-when someone broke the rules they would get a mark on the chalkboard
-team with fewest or both below 5 would receive prize
-loosing team would not get prizes
if a team received less than 20marks in a week they would get 4min extra for recess

Rules:

  • no leaving seat without permission
  • no sitting on desks
  • no moving desk
  • no getting up to talk with neighbour
  • no getting out of seat to chalkboard unless given permission
  • were allowed to go see teacher one at a time
  • no talking without permission
  • no calling teachers name unless given permission to answer
  • no vocal noises.

Prizes:

  • victory tag
  • star for chart
  • line up first for lunch
  • 30m free time at the end of the day
27
Q

GC design

A

reversal and multiple beseline

-4 phases for each subject recorded (8 total)

28
Q

GC 1

A

Math/reading BL

  • 10 sessions the normal rates of out of seat and talking out behaviour were recorded
  • teacher did normal routine
29
Q

GC 2

A

math game/reading BL
2nd phase
game introduced during math but not reading

30
Q

GC 3

A

reversal math/reading game

31
Q

GC 4

A

math game/reading game
both periods treated as one extended period
same criteria 5 or fewer marks

32
Q

GC results

A

These data indicate that the game had a reliable effect, since out-of-seat and talking-out behaviors changed maximally only when the game was applied.
-Both teams almost always won the game.

33
Q

GC S/L

A

component analysis

  • extra time from the teacher
  • hard for the teacher to always track
  • children requested the game
34
Q

SM purpose

A

he purpose of the present investigation was to determine whether a self-monitoring pro- cedure, with minimal supervisory involvement, could increase adherence to scheduled activities and on-task behavior. In addition, generalization mea- sures were collected to determine whether these behaviors were affected throughout the work shift.

35
Q

SM participants/setting

A

2 homes with ID ppl

-10 staff

36
Q

SM DV

A
  • on schedule behaviour, if they were in their assigned activity area
  • on task behaviour, if they were engaging in bx defined by the house ass appropriate
37
Q

SM observations

A
  • told they were going to observe but wouldn’t effect performance
  • observations were repeated around every 5m, 12 done per day in house A, 18 in house B
  • recorded location and first Bx emitted within 5s
38
Q

SM Gen probes

A

done in the same way as observations, but in the evening

39
Q

SM reliability

A
  • 2 ind observers for 50% of sessions equal across conditions
  • on schedule 100% agreement for AB
  • on task 89/85
40
Q

SM procedure BL

A

BL: daily schedule posted for staff to see
card given on how to complete the activity
-jobs were: group training, training sessions, client/home duties
-feedback given at the end of the day

41
Q

SM design

A

multiple baseline design across groups of staff

42
Q

SM procedure In Service

A
  • exp told staff what their job responsibilities were
  • gave rational for jobs
  • staff rehearsed interacting with clients
43
Q

SM procedure Self-monitoring

A

give staff schedule visual with definitions

  • had staff fill in cards throughout after each activity
  • end of shift cards put in box in the office
44
Q

SM procedure Feedback plus self monitoring

A

-trained on definitions and cards as before
supervisors were taught to give feedback
-gave to staff 2 times each weekday
-supervisors located staff and recorded first behaviour of that employee (either praised or corrected)

45
Q

SM group results

A

for on task and on schedule behaviours:
no change in-service condition
increase during self monitoring
increase again when feedback was added

46
Q

SM individual results

A

behavior of 5 of the 10 staff members became more variable over time

47
Q

SM on schedule for specific activities

A

same results for: zones 1:1 and custodial activities

48
Q

SM gen probes

A

Some generalization of the effects of the proce- dures was shown during observations carried out in the evening. With no observers present and no visible contingencies involved.

49
Q

SIP design

A

multiple baseline design across subjects

50
Q

SIP past problems

A
  • response maintenance

- some procedures have failed to find significant effects

51
Q

SIP subjects/setting

A

3 participants

  • preschool
  • teachers reported highly disruptive and undesirable behaviour
  • 4yrs old
52
Q

SIP DV

A

on task behaviour - Bx directed towards the assigned task.
attentive/silent
-Off task movement about the room, playing with toys, fighting, kicking,, leaving the classroom without permission

53
Q

SIP Observation and recording

A

categorized as on or off task by two judges

  • data taken twice per day, 4 days a week
  • 30m observations were conducted in the morning and afternoon when class activities were more structured.
  • 10s intervals, had to engage in Bx for the whole interval
54
Q

SIP reliability

A

agree divided by total agree and disagreements

  • extra checks by the experimenter every 8 days
  • overal observer observer reliability 94%
  • experimenter-pbserver reliability 92%
55
Q

SIP procedure

A

BL: first 8 days, no experimental manipulations
Self instruction: participants seen individually for self instruction sessions for 2hrs
1) modelled task while talking aloud
2)subjet performer task with experimenter instructed aloud
3)the subject then performed task talking outloud
4)subject did the task while whispering while the experimenter mad slip movements with no sound
5) subject performed the task making lip movements without sound
6_the subject performed the task with covert self instruction

56
Q

SIP verbalizations modelled

A

4 types

  • questions about the task
  • answers to questions (cog rehearsal)
  • self instructions that guide through the task
  • self reinforcement
57
Q

SIP additional info

A

used chocolate as reward but faded out

  • presented in a story like manor
  • if made an error the experimenter modelled while talking out loud.
  • wide variety of tasks were completed with difficulty level increasing
58
Q

SIP experimental control

A

to avoid confounding variables that training and treatment were done on the same day ‘-only one subject received self instruction training, the others

59
Q

SIP on task behaviour

A

Following the 2-hr training in self- instruction, there was an immediate and dra- matic increase in on-task behaviour

60
Q

SIP results

A

Results indicated that behavioral gains transferred to the classroom setting and were maintained for a considerable period of time.

61
Q

SIP cause for gen

A

preschool was maintains an ever-increasing repertoire of ap- propriate behaviors in children. As a result of such “trapping”, changes in the boys’ behavior may have produced changes in the teacher’s be- havior, leading to maintenance of treatment gains

Children in the present investigation were asked to imagine, in the presence of the experimenter, that they were performing tasks assigned by their classroom teacher. The use of such specific covert rehearsal may thus facilitate development and maintenance of appropriate classroom behavior.

62
Q

what are the limitations of a probe

A

-Data is suggestive rather than confirmatory

-

63
Q

What is a probe

A

A brief phase in a behavior analysis experiment designed to test the effect of a given intervention.

64
Q

why would you use a probe

A
  • to reduce reactivity
  • when subjects aren’t able to complete behaviour on a regular bases (writing essays)
  • how many times do you have to fail before saying you cant do the behaviour.