Test 1 RM Flashcards

1
Q

Using simultaneous presentation to increase veg consumption in a mildly selective child with autism

A
  • most Bx is focused on consequence manipulation not antecedent management
  • 1 participant multiple baselines across food with reversal
  • pref assessment with 8 condiments (15 bites) picked 3
  • DV: % of bites consumed. Defined by eating accepting within 10 seconds of ‘take a bite’
  • Session 15 bites, never refused. No consequences if they did refuse
  • IOR. 40% of trails take.
  • IV: procedure, condiment not covering the whole food item
  • Baseline 0 its, treatment 100%, baseline 0
  • Simultaneous presentation was effective. Study did not fine flavour-flavor conditioning since baseline went back to 0%
  • future look at pickier eaters

IR multiple baselines across food items with reversal. Simultaneous pairings.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Why is the individual so important

A
  • Bring research and practice closer together
  • to isolate mechanisms of change
  • therefore contributing to new procedures
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is extrapolation of parts

A

brain functions were mapped out by slowly destroying different areas fo the brain. Following Brocca’s study.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

jnd

A

just noticeable difference of sensory thresholds

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

contribution of repeated measures

A
  • single case design
  • recognizing the individuality
  • applied problems
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

normal law of error

A

normal distribution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Variability with the subject

A

fetcher noticed variability from trial to trial with sensory differences, these appeared to be normally distributed. However this raised question to error in group designs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

introspection

A

observe ones own thoughts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

retention curve

A

shows forgetting over time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

basis of inferential statistics

A

generality
applicability
based on averages
make estimations based on certain characteristics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the case study method

A

record persons development over time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Disadvantages to reporting percentages of success

A

When scores are lumped together they become meaningless. some people will make gains and others will not.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

IV

A

the procedure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

DV

A

how/what you measure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

major limitations to statistical averaging

A
  • loose individuals outliers and scores

- cannot apply to heterogeneous groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Problem to applying global treatments to heterogeneous groups

A

-cant tell what characteristics are associated with success so they don’t know if people will get better or worse

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

ethical limitations

A

not okay to withhold treatment from one group (control)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

practice problems to group comparisons

A
  • ethics
  • cant find homogeneous groups
  • averaging results
  • generality
  • intersubject validity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

what is the problem with averaging results

A

will not represet performance of anyone in the group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

homogeneous groups

A

are the same (but really cant be because of individual differences).
grouped by academic performance vs. all grade level in the same class (heterogeneous)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

within subject variability

A

ind differences within a subject from trial to trail. Sensory test example.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

correlation

A

when2 or more variable have a relationship

23
Q

correlation research

A

to study if variables relate
DV are related
correlation does not equal causation

24
Q

naturalistic study

A

observe and record without interfering

25
Q

advantages of naturalistic study

A
some things cant be manipulated
observer does affect behaviour
natural setting (rather than a lab)
26
Q

process research

A

interested in what happens during therapy. data throughout

27
Q

outcome research

A

interested in the changes as a result of research

do pre and post test measures

28
Q

scientist-practicioner split

A

research had little clinical significance/implications. So these were broken into experimental Psyc and applied Psyc (beh therapy)??

29
Q

what is the purpose of the single case approach

A

ie case study
record of research in which detailed consideration is given to the development of a particular person, group, or situation over a period of time.

30
Q

case study contributions (functions)

A

generate hypothesis
study rare conditions
cast doubt one well known phenomenon

31
Q

representative case

A

maybe be generalized to similar conditions with overlapping variables

32
Q

shapiros contribution to science

A

introduced independent wth repeated measures
first to study psychopathology
true experimental approach to treatment
used ABA design

33
Q

time series design

A

AB design

34
Q

equivalent time series design

A

ABA design

35
Q

what contribution did behaviour therapy make to scientific study

A

it contributed to the development of a sophisticated methodology of intensive study of individual subjects.
multielement experimental designs (abab)

36
Q

3 stages of intervention dev

A
  • functional relationship
  • replicate
  • multiple clinical trials and focused on single case approaches
37
Q

Intersubject variability

A

differences between individuals

38
Q

Applied

A

socially significant

relationship between behaviour, subject, and stimuli

39
Q

Behavioural

A

is observable and objectively measurable
not interested in introspection
pragmatism

40
Q

Analysis

A

demonstrates experimental control
can do through multiple baselines or single case design (with reversal)
Reliability - was the procedure responsible for the change

41
Q

Parametric analysis

A

how the IV variety with the DV

42
Q

Technological

A

using clear consistent language when explaining procedure. Is able to replicate even without experience

43
Q

Conceptual systems

A

not a random occurrence, replete back to concepts (ie shaping)

44
Q

Effective

A

socially significant (clinical significant not just experimentally). D vs C is that good enough

45
Q

Generality

A

Generalization over behaviour time, subjects, and settings

46
Q

btwn Ind differences vs within ind gains (tests)

A

psychometric and edumetric

47
Q

psychometric example and edumetric example

A

general aptitude vs term test on square roots

48
Q

P/E item selection

A

P- want p.5 remove 100/0, want lots of variance. lower variance less reliability.
Can also correlate scores with other tests. ppl tend to get the same CR/IR.
E-want sensitivity to growth (pre/post) p.0 to start and p .1.0 to finish treatment

49
Q

P/E validity

A

P-test against scores on similar test

E-Give to situation where gain is expected

50
Q

P/E reliability

A

P-same discriminations between individuals on two occasions

E- present alternate form to show variance (growth) of test scores within an individual.

51
Q

Reliability

A

consistent

52
Q

Validity

A

test what we want to test

53
Q

R/E score interpretation

A

P- don’t use raw scores because we are comparing

E- Can use raw scores