Task 3 Flashcards
1
Q
What is meant by a fallacy ?
A
- defect in argument consists in something other than false premises alone
- it is a mistake of reasoning
2
Q
What is meant by formal and informal fallacy ?
A
- Formal: identified by examining form / structure
- Informal: identified by examining the content
3
Q
What is meant by the fallacy “appeal of force “?
A
- If you threaten someone to agree to an conclusion then it is not a valid argument
4
Q
What is meant by the fallacy “appeal to pity” ?
A
- you try to gain support of your conclsuion via pity (mitleid)
5
Q
What is meant by the fallacy “The appeal to the people “
- Also mention the direct and indirect approach !
A
- direct: Evoke mentality / euphoria with the audience to outvalue rational logic (larger group)
- Indirect: appeal to individual by focusing on some aspect of their relationship with the crowd (directed at only one person)
6
Q
What is meant by the bandwagon argument ?
A
- you convince someone because you focus one the aspect “if he does not agree he would feel left out “ !
- used by “the appeal to the peole”
7
Q
What is meant by appeal to vanity ?
A
- associate conclusion/product with someone who is admired
- used by “the appeal to the peole”
8
Q
What is meant by “Ad hominem abusive fallacy” ?
A
- if you use in your argumentation verbal agression
9
Q
What is menat by “ad hominem circumstantial fallacy” ?
A
- using a current circumstences to make an argument invalid
10
Q
What is meant by the “Tu quoque fallacy” ?
A
- When one of the person refers to something you have done in the past as well to justify an action
- it is about characteristics
- “you too”
11
Q
What is meant by “the straw man fallacy” ?
A
- The straw man fallacy is committed when an arguer distorts/deforms an opponent’s argument for the purpose of more easily attacking it
- It seem like the real argument was demolished but actually it was all about the deformed one
12
Q
What is meant by “the mising the point fallacy” ?
A
- arguments/premises supports a conclusion but then one another oftern vagiely related to the first is drawn
13
Q
What is meant by “the red herring fallacy ? “
A
- divert attention by changing subject to a different sometimes subtly related one to then draw a conclusion about this different subject
- switching the content of an argumentation
14
Q
What is meant by the fallacy of weak induction ?
A
- Connection between premises conclusion is not strong enough
- often emotional grounds for believing the conclusion
(overall fallacy)
15
Q
What is meant by “the appeal to unqualified autohirty fallacy ? “
A
- when you belief/trust someone who is not trustworthy
- lack the expertise, might be biased
16
Q
What is meant by “the appeal to ignorance fallacy “ ? (As a help try to create an example)
-> also name the two exception
A
- premise states that nothing has been proven one way so conclusion is that it has to be the other way aroung
- Example: Nobody has proven that X is true -> conlcusion: X is false !
- > Exception: 1. Research and then courtroom
17
Q
What is meant by the “hasty generalization fallacy” ?
A
- the sample is not representative of the group
- Conclusion is invalid because of using the wrong sample
18
Q
What is meant by “the fallacy of false cause” ?
A
- occurs whenever the link between premises and conclusion depends on some imagined causal connection that probably does not exist
- Chearleader example
19
Q
What is meant by “the fallacy of slippery slope ?”
A
- Usually a conclusion rests on a chain reaction (Multiple arguments building up on each other)
- but in this fallacy they do not because arguments do not really build up on each other
20
Q
What is meant by “the fallacy of weak analogy” ? Use an example to describe the fallacy”
A
- is committed when the analogy is not strong enough to support the conclusion that is drawn.
- In my notes they used the “blue car” analogy as an example
21
Q
What is meant by “the fallacy of begging the question?” Also explain how the fallacy achives it goal !
A
- whenever the arguer creates the illusion that inadequate premises provide adequate support for the conclusion
1. Leaving out possibly false key premise
2. just formulate a possibly false premise as the conclusion (using differnt language)
3. reasoning in a circle
22
Q
What is menat by “the fallacy of complex question “?
A
- two/more questions are asked and a single answer is given to them both
- it is about an unjustified presumption
23
Q
What is meant by “the fallacy of false ditchotomy “
A
- When the argument states that there is only 2 options and one of them is really bad
- “either or”
- one of the premises is usually so bad that you know the conclusion before asking the question
- Usually that is never the case that only twop options are offered
24
Q
What is meant by the fallacy of “the fallacy of suppressed evidence” ?
A
- if an arguer leaves out or ignores important piece of evidence
- and hides certain information
25
What is meant by "the fallaccy of equivocation"?
- word used in 2 different ways
| - word means in the first premises something different then in comparison to the second one
26
What is meant by "The fallacy of amphiboly" ?
- occurs when the arguer misinterprets a statement and draws based on that interpretation a wrong conclusion
27
What is meant by "The fallacy of composition" ?
- when a conclusion is over generalized by an arguer (from specific to a whole)
28
What is meant by "the fallacy of divison" ?
- reverse of composition
| - from whole to specific
29
What is the difference between the fallacy of hasty generalization vs composition ?
- Ask someone
30
Name the 7 conditions which decides if an premis is valid:
- It has to met at least one or more of the 7 conditions
1. It is supported by a sub-argument that is convincing
2. It is known prior to be true
3. It is cogently supported elsewhere by the arguer or another person
4. It is supported via common knowledge
5. It is supported by a person with an appropriate testimony/experience (zeugnis).
6. It is supported by an proper authority
7. It is not known to be unacceptable or acceptable and can serve provisionally as the basis for argument (in hypothetic terms)
31
Name the 5 conditions which decides if an premis is not valid:
- it has to met at least one or more of the 5 conditions
1. They are refutable (wiederlegbar) on the basis of common knowledge, a priori knowledge, or reliable knowledge from testimony or authority
2. They are known prior to be false
3. Several premises, taken together, can be shown to produce a contradiction
4. If a premise is stated in language that is vague or ambiguous
5. The fallacy of begging the question
32
What is meant by the Mecc rule ?
- mutually exclusive: you don’t want to have the same argument twice
- Collectively Exhaustive: But u need all the arguments which are given in the text
33
What is meant by the pyramid rule ?
1. the higher up the argument is placed in the argument tree, the more general and abstract it should be
2. when two arguments are placed on the same level, they should have the same level of abstraction
34
What is meant by a refutation ?
- If a counter argument is itself is rejected within an argument (refuation on rebuttal so the refutation makes the original claim valid again
35
What is meant by an Rebuttal ?
- When a reason is followed by an objection within an argument
36
What is meant by an Multilayer arguments ?
- An argument in which reasons or objections have drawn out new reasons or objections.
37
What is meant by the fallacy of accident ?
Applying a rule accidently to an argument which it was not meant for
38
When is a rebutal a rebutal towards the conclusion or a rebutal towards the premise ?
- If the counterargument sounds like a co premise it is a counterargument towards the conclusion
- if not then it is a counterargument towards the premise
