Talent and Org. Dev Flashcards
Layers of culture - Iceberg
- Explicit, noticeable (above the water line)
- Values, attitudes, beliefs (below the water line)
Layers of culture - Onion
Implicit (layers must be peeled away, to reach the core)
Starting from the inside - Self, family, gender, age, social class, ethnic group, country, region, universal human nature.
Root of the culture in history.
Backstage
Not easily observed, only known by people in that culture.
Similar to Onion
Front Stage
Easily observable aspects of culture.
Similar to Iceberg
Parochialism
Only one way
Ethnocentrism
Our way is the best
Stereotyping
All people within a culture behave, feel, and act the same.
Equifinality
Our way is not the only way
Diversity
Recognizing and valuing Differences
Heterogeneity
We are not all the same
Cultural Contingency
Our way is one possible way
Confucion Work Dynamism
The degree that a society embraces the values of long term vs short term commitments with respect for tradition.
Supports a strong worth ethic.
Long term rewards are expected as a result of todays hard work.
Power Distance
Degree of inequality among people in society
High power distance
Autocratic or paternalist - based on people’s social class people expect a level of inequality.
China
Lower Power Distance
More participative decision-making
US
Uncertainty Avoidance
Do not like ambiguity or risk
High UA
Prefer structure, rules of behavior
Low turnover, reluctance to start new ventures
France
Russia
Greece
Japan
Low UA
More flexible, easy going
Entrepreneurial
US
UK
Sweden
Individualist Culture
Responsible for self
Autonomy
Australia Netherlands Germany US UK
Collectivist
Responsible for family/group
Group decisions
Flat rate pay system works well.
China Columbia Venezuela Hong Kong Indo West Africa Brazil
Masculinity/Femininity
Tough vs Tender
Gender role differences
Masculine
Success, money, assertiveness, competition
US Italy Germany Austria Brazil Chile
Feminine
Quality of life, service, cooperation, healthy, workplace
Sweden
Denmark
Netherlands
Mexico
7 Dimensions Cultural Model - Trompenaar
People: Uni vs Particularism Ind vs Communitarianism (Coll) Neutral vs Affective (emotional) Spec vs Diffuse Achiev vs Ascription
Time:
Sequential vs Synchronic
Enviro:
Control vs Harmony
Universalism
rules based
everyone is treated the same
no exceptions
US
German
Sweden
Particularism
Exceptions to rule.
Rules are made to be broken.
China
Middle East
High context
Implied understood although not stated directly.
You have close relationships so you don’t need to say as much. Fewer words needed.
Long standing employee!
Asia
Latin America
Southern EU
Middle East
Low context (Ed Hall)
Stated directly and explicitly
Spelled out
New employee!
English speaking
Germany
Scandinavia
Control Mechanisms ( Wil-Harzing Metaphors)
Bears - dominance of expats over sibs operations
Bees - more emphasis on socialization and culture
Spiders
Bears
Formalized control - perf reviews.
Standardized
Dominent
Bees
Informal - recruitment, promotional opps
Normative control
Socialization
Cross pollinate ideas when travelling
Spiders
Information communication networks
Communication is spread out amongst many different people - subs and HQ’s
Glue technology
management dev policy
gluing the HQs and subs together
just a part of their role, not their primary role
Matrix responsibilities
project role and functional role
Split Egg
Top Egg - project role
Bottom egg - operational role
Steering team
Leads the project
Focused problem-solving team
work on specific project
Virtual teams
Without face to face or few meetings
Delivery teams
Delivers specific product to a customer
Global leaders are:
Cosmopolitan
Culturally Sensitive
Cultural Synergy
Cosmopolitan
Operated comfortably in pluralistic cultural enviro.
Culturally Sensitive
Builds relationships with culturally different people
Cultural Synergy
Combines the strengths of each cultural group
Attributes of strong global leaders
Two categories:
End state skills:
- Managerial competencies
Ability to Learn from Experience
- Seeks opps to learn
- Seeks and uses feedback
- Open to criticism
- Is flexible
Global Mindset
Think global, act local
Contingency Theory
Different styles and different leaders more appropriate for different situation.
Global Leader in the US
Employees expect managers to involved them in decision-making.
Most powerful learning experience for a new global manager
Business Turnaround - failing business
Training programs for Global Enviro
Three audiences:
Development of expats before, during and after foreign assignments
Orientation and training of expats families
Development of the HQ staff
Sign that people are not learning in training
excessive nodding, smiling, no questions
Learning preferences - US
Accept participating with different hierarchy levels
Value competition and individuality
- Would have notes before hands
Learning preferences - Japan
Emphasis on harmony
Competition between groups, not individuals
- Group discussion or handson learning
Learning preferences - Middle East
Group must be homogenous in terms of company hierarchy
Fear loss of face
Memorization and auditory learning
Culture in Performance Mgmt
Motivations:
- some people feel $ is a reward
- Want rewards tied to individuals while others would prefer group
Performance mgmt in difference countires
Japan - saving face, would never single out someone and give them formal feedback.
China - insistence on maintaining harmony, give the group the credits.
Germany - value directness
Middle East - constantly monitored and measured for individual performance. Managing for negative behaviour.
Needs analysis
Review of the following:
Mission - now Vision - future
Core values
Strategic Business plan
Org Development
Organizational Development - past state of the company to a future state which will involve training and development.
Needs assessment methodologies
Surveys/Questionnaire Interviews Performance Reviews Observations Tests Assessment Centers Focus Groups Document Review Advisory committee
How to determine if someone can be a leader or an IA?
Assessment centres
ADDIE MODEL
The process by which training programs are conceived, developed, and delivered.
- Assessment
- Design
- Development
- Implement
- Evaluate
- most common system
- does not need to occur in sequential order
Kinesthetic learner
Need to learn with their hands.
Crafts and trades type jobs.
Design training programs as hands on as possible.
Prefer the demonstration performance method of teaching.
Visual leaners
Need to see it to learn it.
Auditory learners
Need to hear it not necessarily read something.
Bloom’s Taxonomy
When designing a training program, must consider 3 things:
- Cognitive (brain) - knowledge and inform them about a topic.
- Affective (heart) - How people feel about something (cultural training)
- Psychomotor (hands) - kinesthetic - hands on (driving a truck, build a brick wall)
Power distance
Smaller the gap the more likely the person at the bottom will reach out to the person at the top.
Low power distance countries
US
High power distance
countries
Mexico
South Korea
India
Uncertainty avoidance
Like formal rules and to know what is happening next. Likes stability. Level of risk aversion.
High uncertainty avoidance cultures
Japan
Greece