systematic reviews Flashcards
Systematic reviews
review of a clearly formulated question – uses systematic and standardised methods to identify , select and be critical to relevant research and collet then analyse data from studies to include in the review.Answers specific clinical question e.g. chemotherapy of people who are over 40
Meta- analysis
uses statistical techniques in a systematic review to integrate results of included studies – uses different studies. Looks at studies from systematic review. Only for quantitate data
Literature review
summarises a topic which is broad for example cancer treatment
2 types of systematic reviews
-Cochrane – focus on intervention and treatment
-systematic reviews of non-intervention- diagnostics, that includes other study designs
2 steps of rationale for systematic review methodology
1.define research question -clearly formulated
2.prepare and register- detailed and systematic
advantage of systematic review
transparent + reproducible
disadvantage of systematic review
bias in selecting methods
literature search
identifying
advantage of literature search
generalisability
disadvantage of literature search
impact of publication bias
study selection disadvantage
bias in selecting study
data extraction disadvantage
outcome reporting bias
quality assessment advantage
critical appraise
quality assessment disadvantage
bias from primary studies
data synthesis -analysing advantage
detects publication bias
study selection
have eligibility criteria pre-defined having a good audit trail makes it systematic , have duplicate screening -having 2 people do the screening
Data extraction
extracting info that is needed from the papers and recording :patient characteristics, study design, results and outcomes. 2 researchers independently extract the data
3 examples of Quality of assessment tools
RCT, observational studies and economic evaluation
Data synthesis
Heterogeneity in systematic reviews: variability among studies
3 Different types data synthesis
1.clinical heterogeneity: variability in participants , interventions and outcomes
2.methodlogical heterogeneity- variability in study design and risk of bias
3.statistical heterogeneity-consequence of clinical and methodlogical diversty , or both of them among studies
3 limitations of systematic review?
-resources and time
-publication bias
-findings not being consistent