Subject Jdx Flashcards
Federal courts have ____ subject matter jdx
limited
State courts have ___ subject matter jdx
general
A federal court having jdx ____ away from state court
does not take concurrent jdx
Subject matter jdx cannot be _____ by the parties
waived or construed
Even if a defendant does not move for dismissal under 12(b)(1), if a federal court does not have jurisdiction, the court still __
needs to kick case out anytime jdx lacking
Defendants can ___ when a case filed in state court falls within federal subject matter jdx.
remove to Fed court
When Ds remove, the case goes to the __
nearest Fed court
Send case back to state court
remand
Commonly assumed that Ps prefer
state court
Article 3 does not actually require __
Fed courts
Federal Question statute
1331
1331 is about
federal Q jdx
1331 says the district courts shall have __
original jurisdiction of all civil actions arising under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States.
Original jdx means
case can start in that court
1331 has the ____ as Article 3 but __
same language, interprets more strictly
Arguments for Fed Q jdx
fed cts expertise in fed law, framers expected state cts to be hostile to federal rights, insulate state courts from unpopular decisions
Well pleaded complain rule holds that a _______ will always satisfy 1331
federally created CoA
Well pleaded complaint rule says only jurisdiction if the federal cause of action
appears on the face of a complaint that satisfies Rule 8
Mottley rule
Well pleaded complaint rule cannot be satisfied based on a defense/counterclaim or by an anticipation of a defense/counterclaim based on federal law.
P generally gets to choose to avoid fed jdx if __
only state law claims
A state law claim that is ___ can be removable to federal court
completely preempted by federal law
Complete preemption is when
federal preemption is so strong that there is no such thing as a state-law claim (not same as conflict or ordinary preemption)
Complete preemption occurs when
Congress intended federal statute to provide the exclusive cause of action for the claim and set forth procedures and remedies governing that action. Then it necessarily arises under federal law
statute about diversity jdx
1332
1332(a)
diversity jdx when matter in controversy > 75K AND between citizens of different states (or of a foreign state)
1332(b)
if diversity jdx judgment results in less than 75K may deny or impose costs on P
1332(d) is about
CAFA
1332(d)(2)
The district courts have original jurisdiction over a class action in which there are at least 100 members, the matter in controversy exceeds $5,000,000, and any plaintiff is of a state different from any defendant.
1332(d)(3)
A district court may decline to exercise jurisdiction over a class action where greater than 1/3 but less than 2/3 of PLs and the primary DFs are citizens of the state in which the action was originally filed based on:
1332(d)(5)
No diversity jurisdiction if 2/3+ are nondiverse or defendant is a state government or official
arguments in favor of diversity jdx
state cts may not be level playing fields, OG reason state courts would favor creditors over debtors, promoting national economy
arguments against diversity jdx
against federalism principles, impedes development of state common law, diminishes incentives for state court reform
Strawbridge holding
Complete diversity- every P must be from a different state than every D
exception to strawbridge
impleading, Kroger