Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM


Top Flashcards (Certified)
All Flashcards

FRCP > PJ 1 > Flashcards

PJ 1 Flashcards

1
Q

Basics of PJ

A

Power of court to bring, fairness to D, defense to Full Faith and Credir, first statute, if yes constitutional

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

R4 significance

A

District court look to state rules

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Define in personam

A

Power to enter money judgment against D

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Define in rem

A

Power to render judgment against property in territory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Define Quasi in rem

A

Property in territory gives cts power to enter money judgment against claim unrelated to property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

L

A

Not subject to in personam unless..

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What remains good law from Pennoyer

A

Served while D/agent in the forum/D domicile/ D consents to PJ

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Pennoyer facts

A

Mitchell and Neff

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Pennoyer Holding

A

No pj in og suit so Neff recovers the land

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Pennoyer reasoning

A

5

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Notes about Pennoyer

A

3

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

IS rule

A

Minimum contacts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

IS holding

A

Sufficient minimum contacts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

IS reasoning

A

4

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Minimum contacts analysis

A

Availment and arise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

SoC theory

A

Reasonably predict

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Cases against P availment

A

Walden, Hanson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Brennan/Ginsburg SoC

A

Put into stream

19
Q

Kennedy SoC

A

Brennan + show intent to serve State C, target

20
Q

WWV SoC argument

21
Q

Daimler SoC argument

A

General no

22
Q

Traditional Notions of Fair Play Analysid

A

Burger King 5

23
Q

Daimler fair play ruling

A

No reasonableness test in general

24
Q

Asahi fair play analysis

A

Skip minimum contacts if fairenness clearly against

25
Q

WWV Rule

A

Mere foreseeability not minimum contacts

26
Q

WWV holding

A

No specific Jdx for NY distributors

27
Q

WWV Reasoning

A

Every chattel agent of process

28
Q

Why sue local distributors in WWV

A

Stay in state Ct

29
Q

BK holding

A

Jdx upheld because D had minimum contacts and was fair

30
Q

BK reasoning

A

Reached out, high burden bar

31
Q

Kennedy Nicastro

A

Different from IS, targeted US but not NJ, no Jdx over unconsenting d

32
Q

Sovereignty argument Kennedy nicastro

33
Q

Ginsburg Nicastro

34
Q

Ford rule

A

Arise out of OR relate to

35
Q

Footnote Ford

36
Q

Ford reasoning

37
Q

Critique of Ford

A

Too big to fail purposeful availment

38
Q

Goodyear Rule

A

At home, SoC no

39
Q

Why foreign and litigate in CA

40
Q

Daimler reasoning

41
Q

Daimler concurrence

42
Q

BNSF rule

A

Significant assets not equal at home

43
Q

General Trilogy notes

FRCP (18 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2025 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions