Joinder 2: Class Actions, Interplead/Intervention Flashcards
Rule 22 is about
interpleaders
22(a)(1)
Persons with claims that may expose a P to double or multiple liability may be joined as Ds and be required to interplead
22(a)(2)
A defendant exposed to similar liability may seek interpleader through a crossclaim or counterclaim
Interpleading applies when
exposure to multiple liability AND/OR incompatible court orders
Interpleader is used to figure out ___
who has the superior claim to sue someone
Interpleader allows a P or D to initiate a lawsuit to –
compel other parties to litigate a dispute , have property that is another’s but don’t know to whom it should be transferred
Interpleader often applies to resolve disputes under __
insurance contracts
Stakeholder in interpleader is
when normally D becomes P
Stake is the ___
subject of claims between adverse claimants who would normally be Ps
For interpleaders, the adverse claimants must be ..
demanding the same thing
Example of interpleader: life insurance policy and dispute among proper beneficiaries
to resolve dispute, insurance company files interpleader, they are stakeholder, adverse claimants are people who might be beneficiaries
Rule 24 is about
intervention
24(a) is about
Intervention as of Right
24(a)
Court must permit anyone to intervene who is given the unconditional right by federal statute or interest relating to subject of the action so that disposing of it may impair or impede the movant’s ability to protect its interest unless existing parties adequately represent that interest
24(b) is about
permissive intervention
24(b)
court may permit anyone to intervene who is given a conditional right by fed statute or has a claim or defense that shares aquestion of law or fact with the main action
Permissive intervention is up to __
judicial discretion
24(b)(3)
delay or prejudice. Court must consider whether intervention will unduly delay ore prejudice adjudication of original parties’ rights
Courts normally permit parties to be ___ intervenor
“silent”
NIPSCO is about
intervention criteria, atypical R24 outcome
NIPSCO rule
To intervene as a right, must show timely application, direct signifcantly protectable interest, disposition may impede ability to protect that interest and interest not adequately represented by existing parties
NIPSCO facts
Save Dune council filed to intervene saying stake in protecting and preserving the land for public use
NIPSCO holding
reject motion to intervene because no significant legally protectable interest so not required to permit
NIPSCO reasoning 1
Council doesn’t have claim to land, interest not term of art but defining it here
NIPSCO reasoning 2
permissive denied to avoid undue delay to OG parties (untimely because no automatic right but 4 years too long for permissive)
In class actions, individual class members lose..
control over their own claims in exchange for the benefits of collective action
Benefits of class actions
ability to bring suits inefficient in individual litigation or injunctions with large scale releif
Difference between other joinder and class actions
most P class members are absent from the litigation
Rule about class actions
23
23(a) is about
prerequisities for class actions (numerosity, commonality, typicality, adequacy)
23(a)(1)
class so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable (numerosity)
23(a)(2)
questions of law or fact common to the class (commonality)