Study Guide Chapter 8: Lower Gastrointestinal Cancers Flashcards
- What percentage of anal canal cancer patients present with extrapelvic visceral metastasis?
A. <5 %
B. 10 %
C. 20 %
D. 25 %
- The correct answer is A. A minority of patients present with extrapelvic visceral metastases. When present, these lesions occur most commonly in the liver and lungs. Of note, involvement of para-aortic lymph nodes constitutes M1 disease. Minsky BD, Welton ML, Pineda CE, Fisher GA. Cancer of the anal canal. In: Hoppe RT, Phillips TL, Roach M, editors. Leibel and Phillips textbook of radiation oncology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2010. p. 870–82.
- Pelvic lymph node metastases are present in what percentage of anal cancer patients at time of diagnosis?
A. 10 %
B. 20 %
C. 30 %
D. 40 %
- The correct answer is C. Pelvic LNs are involved in 30 % of patients at presentation. Minsky BD, Welton ML, Pineda CE, Fisher GA. Cancer of the anal canal. In: Hoppe RT, Phillips TL, Roach M, editors. Leibel and Phillips textbook of radiation oncology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2010. p. 870–82.
- According to 7th edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, a patient with anal canal cancer with a metastasis in a R inguinal lymph node and a L internal iliac LN would be staged as:
A. N1
B. N2
C. N3
D. M1
- The correct answer is B. N2 disease is defined as “metastasis in unilateral internal iliac and/or inguinal lymph node(s).” Having bilateral internal iliac lymph node involvement or bilateral inguinal lymph node involvement would be defined as N3 disease. Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, et al., editors. Anus. AJCC cancer staging handbook. 7th ed. New York: Springer; 2010.
- What is the 5-year overall survival of a patient with stage I anal cancer ?
A. 95 %
B. 85 %
C. 80 %
D. 75 %
- The correct answer is B. The 5-year overall survival of stage I anal cancer is 85 %. For stages II–IV, it is 75 %, 50 %, and 5 %, respectively. Minsky BD, Welton ML, Pineda CE, Fisher GA. Cancer of the anal canal. In: Hoppe RT, Phillips TL, Roach M, editors. Leibel and Phillips textbook of radiation oncology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2010. p. 870–82.
- According to the 7th edition of AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, a patient with anal canal cancer with a metastasis in a R inguinal lymph node and a perirectal lymph node would be staged as:
A. N1
B. N2
C. N3
D. M1
- The correct answer is C. N3 disease is defi ned as “metastasis in perirectal and inguinal lymph nodes and/or bilateral internal iliac and/or inguinal lymph nodes.” Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, et al., editors. Anus. AJCC cancer staging handbook. 7th ed. New York: Springer; 2010.
- What was the pathological complete response rate seen in patients undergoing
chemoRT, then surgery, as reported by Nigro et al.?
A. <20 %
B. 30–40 %
C. 60–70 %
D. >85 %
- The correct answer is D. Ten years after fi rst publishing his protocol of 5-FU, mitomycin C, and radiation, follow-up data of 104 patients undergoing preoperative chemoRT, then surgery, showed pathological complete response in 97 of 104 patients (93 %). This high pathological complete response rate pioneered chemoRT as a viable treatment option, precluding the need for abdominoperineal resection. Nigro ND et al. An evaluation of combined therapy for squamous cell cancer of the anal canal. Dis Colon Rectum. 1984;27:763–6.
- RTOG 98-11 compared mitomycin-C-based conventional chemoRT to induction 5-FU/cisplatin followed by chemoRT with 5-FU/cisplatin. It found a significant improvement in which of the following:
A. Overall survival favoring the induction arm
B. Progression-free survival favoring the mitomycin-C-based chemoRT arm
C. Colostomy-free rate favoring the mitomycin-C-based chemoRT arm
D. Local-regional failure rate favoring the induction arm
- The correct answer is C. Six hundred eighty-two patients with anal cancer were randomized to receive either (1) concurrent fl uorouracil and mitomycin with radiotherapy (45–59 Gy) or (2) induction fl uorouracil and cisplatin with radiotherapy starting on day 57. With a median follow-up of 2.5 years, there was no significant benefit in 5-year disease-free survival, overall survival, local-regional failure, or the distant metastasis rate. The cumulative rate of colostomy was significantly improved in the mitomycin-C arm (10 % vs. 19 %, p = 0.02). There was increased severe hematologic toxicity in the mitomycin arm ( p < 0.001). Ajani JA et al. Fluorouracil, mitomycin, and radiotherapy vs. fluorouracil, cisplatin, and radiotherapy for carcinoma of the anal canal. JAMA. 2008;299(16): 1914–21.
- According to RTOG 05-29, what dose would be prescribed for a 3.0 cm anal canal primary and an involved inguinal lymph node measuring 3.5 cm?
A. 54 Gy to the primary PTV and 54 Gy to the involved lymph node over 30 fractions
B. 54 Gy to the primary PTV and 50.4 Gy to the involved lymph node over 30 fractions
C. 50.4 Gy to the primary PTV and 50.4 Gy to the involved lymph node over 28 fractions
D. 50.4 Gy to the primary PTV and 45 Gy to the involved lymph node over 28 fractions
- The correct answer is A. This patient has a T2N2 primary. According to RTOG 0529, for N+ disease the primary lesion would be prescribed a dose of 54 Gy over 30 fractions. Because the involved lymph node is greater than 3 cm in size, it would also receive a dose of 54 Gy over 30 fractions. If the lymph node were less than 3 cm in size, it would be prescribed a dose of 50.4 Gy. Kachnic L et al. RTOG 0529: a phase II study of dose-painted IMRT (DP-IMRT), 5-Fluorouracil, and mitomycin-C for the reduction of acute morbidity in anal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;75:s5.
- According to 7th edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, a patient with a 4 cm rectal adenocarcinoma, 8 cm from the anal verge only invading into, but not through the muscularis propria, with one enlarged lymph node (1.5 cm) on endoscopic ultrasound, would be staged as:
A. T1 N1 Mx
B. T2 N1 Mx
C. T2 N2 Mx
D. Not enough information provided
- The correct answer is B. According to the 7th edition of AJCC staging, invasion into the muscularis propria constitutes T2 disease. Invasion through the muscularis propria and into pericolorectal tissues constitutes T3 disease. One enlarged lymph node would be N1 disease, which is defined as metastasis in 1–3 regional lymph nodes. Size of the primary is not part of the staging criteria for rectal cancer. Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, et al., editors. Colon and rectum. AJCC cancer staging handbook. 7th ed. New York: Springer; 2010.
- The German Rectal Cancer Study (CAO/ARA/AIO-94) comparing preopera-tive versus postoperative chemoradiation for rectal cancer found:
A. At a median f/u of 11 years, OS was improved for neoadjuvant chemoRT compared to adjuvant chemoRT.
B. Long-term toxicity was worse in the neoadjuvant chemoRT arm compared to the adjuvant arm.
C. At a median f/u of 11 years, there was no difference in local recurrence.
D. More patients were converted to sphincter-preserving surgeries in the neoadjuvant chemoRT arm.
- The correct answer is D. The German Rectal Cancer Study randomized 823 patients with cT3–T4 or cN+ rectal cancers to surgery (TME) followed by chemoRT (55.8 Gy) and 4 cycles of additional bolus 5-FU versus preoperative chemoRT (50.4 Gy) followed by TME followed by an additional 4 cycles of bolus 5-FU. In the initial report (2004) with a median follow-up of 3.8 years, preoperative chemoRT was found to decrease local failure (6 % vs. 13 %, p = 0.006). There was no difference in overall or disease-free survival. More patients were converted to sphincter-preserving surgeries in the neoadjuvant chemoRT arm (39 % vs. 19 %). The latest update published in 2012 reported results with a median follow-up of 11 years. Local recurrence was decreased in the neoadjuvant chemoRT arm (7.1 vs. 10.1 %, p = 0.048). There was still no difference in overall survival between the arms. The overall rates of acute and long- term side effects were lower in the neoadjuvant arm, especially with respect to acute and chronic diarrhea and the development of strictures at the anastomotic site. Sauer et al. Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradio- therapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004 Oct 21;351(17):1731–40. Sauer et al. Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: results of the German CAO/ARO/AIO-94 randomized phase III trial after a median follow-up of 11 years. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jun 1;30(16): 1926–33.
- In the initial report of the German Rectal Cancer Study, what was the pathological complete response rate seen in those patients that underwent preoperative chemoRT?
A. 5 %
B. 8 %
C. 12 %
D. 15 %
- The correct answer is B. The German Rectal Cancer Study randomized 823 patients with cT3–T4 or cN+ rectal cancers to surgery (TME) followed by chemoRT (55.8 Gy) and 4 cycles of additional bolus 5-FU versus preoperative chemoRT (50.4 Gy) followed by TME, followed by an additional 4 cycles of bolus 5-FU. Of those patients that were randomized to preoperative chemoRT prior to total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer, 8 % experienced a pathologi- cal complete response. Sauer et al. Preoperative versus postoperative chemora- diotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004 Oct 21;351(17):1731–40.
- In the initial report of the German Rectal Cancer Study, what percentage of patients initially thought to require abdominoperineal resection were able to undergo sphincter-preserving surgery?
A. 19 %
B. 26 %
C. 39 %
D. 45 %
- The correct answer is C. The German Rectal Cancer Study randomized 823 patients with cT3–T4 or cN+ rectal cancers to surgery (TME) followed by chemoRT (55.8 Gy) and 4 cycles of additional bolus 5-FU versus preoperative chemoRT (50.4 Gy) followed by TME followed by an additional 4 cycles of bolus 5-FU. Of the 415 patients randomized to preoperative chemoRT, 116 were thought to require abdominoperineal resection. Preoperative chemoRT was able to decrease the need for APR, and 45 of these patients (39 %) were able to undergo sphincter-preserving surgery. Sauer et al. Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004 Oct 21;351(17):1731–40.
- Extending radially outwards from the lumen of the rectum, the correct order of tissue layers is:
A. Lamina propria, submucosa, muscularis propria, serosa
B. Lamina propria, muscularis propria, submucosa, serosa
C. Serosa, lamina propria, submucosa, muscularis propria
D. Muscularis propria, serosa, lamina propria, submucosa
- The correct answer is A. Depth of invasion corresponds to T stage. Invasion of the submucosa is T1, invasion into the muscularis propria is T2, and invasion through and beyond the muscularis propria is T3. The serosa is the outermost layer of the rectum. Unlike the esophagus, there is no adventitia in the rectum. Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, et al., editors. Colon and rectum. AJCC cancer staging handbook. 7th ed. New York: Springer; 2010.
- A 65-year-old gentleman with good performance status is diagnosed with a pT2 N1 rectal adenocarcinoma, 7 cm from the anal verge. He is set to start adjuvant chemoradiation. Which of the following is the most established systemic therapy option?
A. Cisplatin and CI 5-FU
B. Cisplatin and bolus 5-FU
C. CI 5-FU
D. CI 5-FU + irinotecan
- The correct answer is C. Six hundred sixty patients with stage II–III rectal cancer received either bolus or protracted venous infusion of fluorouracil with concurrent postoperative radiation. After completing postoperative chemoRT, they were subsequently randomized to receive either higher-dose fl uorouracil alone or fluorouracil + semustine. With a median follow-up of 46 months, those patients that received CI 5-FU had an increased time to relapse and improved survival (70 % vs. 60 %, p = 0.005). Tumor relapse and distant metastases were also decreased. The addition of semustine provided no additional benefi t. O’Connell MJ et al. Improving adjuvant therapy for rectal cancer by combining protracted-infusion fluorouracil with radiation therapy after curative surgery. N Engl J Med. 1994;331(8):502–7.
- In which of the following rectal cancer studies was total mesorectal excision (TME) required?
A. Polish rectal cancer study
B. MRC07
C. Swedish rectal cancer trial
D. Dutch CKVO trial
- The correct answer is D. In the Polish rectal cancer study, TME was required only for distal rectal tumors. Not all, but 92 % of patients underwent TME in the MRC CR 07 trial. In the Swedish rectal cancer trial, TME was not required. The Dutch CKVO trial randomized 1,861 patients with resectable rectal cancer to either preoperative RT (5Gy × 5) followed by TME or TME alone. In the initial report, the rate of local recurrence at 2 years was 2.4 % in the RT+TME 8 Lower Gastrointestinal Cancers arnmayer@uni-mainz.de224 arm versus 8.2 % in the TME-alone arm. Bujko et al. Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing preoperative short-course radiotherapy with preoperative conventionally fractionated chemoradiation for rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2006 Oct;93(10):1215–1523. Kapiteijn et al. Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2001;30:345(9):638–46. Sebag-Montefiore D et al. Preoperative radio- therapy versus selective postoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with rec- tal cancer (MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG C0616): a multicentre, randomized trial. Lancet. 2009;373(9666):811–20.
- A 68-year-old woman with a 4 cm T3N1 rectal adenocarcinoma, 8 cm from the anal verge, presents for consideration of definitive treatment. According to results of the MRC CR07 trial:
A. There is a survival advantage for preoperative chemotherapy and radiation versus adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation for patients with a positive margin.
B. Preoperative chemotherapy and radiation reduces local recurrence and disease-free survival compared to selective adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation.
C. Short-course preoperative radiation (25 Gy over 5 fractions) improves local recurrence rates and disease-free survival compared to selective adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation.
D. Adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation was able to compensate for a positive margin with respect to local control and disease-free survival.
- The correct answer is C. MRC CR 07 compared short-course preoperative RT versus initial surgery with selective postoperative chemoRT for patients with a positive circumferential margin. TME was encouraged, but not required (92 % underwent TME). One thousand three hundred fifty patients were randomized. Preoperative RT consisted of 25 Gy over 5 fractions and adjuvant chemoRT was 45 Gy/25 fractions with concurrent 5-FU. With a median follow-up of 4 years, 3-year local recurrence was 4.4 % versus 10.6 % favoring the preopera- tive RT arm. Three-year disease-free survival was also improved (77.5 % vs. 71.5 %). There was no difference in overall survival. Sebag-Montefi ore D et al. Preoperative radiotherapy versus selective postoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer (MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG C0616): a multicentre, randomized trial. Lancet. 2009;373(9666):811–20.
- Late side effects of the short-course preoperative radiotherapy arm for rectal cancer compared to TME-alone arm as reported by the Dutch colorectal cancer group study found:
A. Stoma function was worse in the radiated arm.
B. Urinary function was worse in the radiated arm.
C. Fecal incontinence was worse in the radiated arm.
D. Satisfaction with bowel function was similar between both arms.
- The correct answer is C. Late side effects from the Dutch colorectal study were reported with a median follow-up of 5.1 years. Stoma function, urinary func- tion, and hospital treatment rates did not differ signifi cantly between the treatment arms. However, irradiated patients, compared with nonirradiated patients, reported increased rates of fecal incontinence (62 % vs. 38 %, respec- tively; p < 0.001), pad wearing as a result of incontinence (56 % vs. 33 %, respectively; p < 0.001), anal blood loss (11 % vs. 3 %, respectively; p = 0.004), and mucus loss (27 % vs. 15 %, respectively; p = .005). Satisfaction with bowel function was signifi cantly lower and the impact of bowel dysfunction on daily activities was greater in irradiated patients compared with patients who under- went TME alone. Peeters et al. Late side effects of short-course preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: increased bowel dysfunction in irradiated patients – a Dutch colorectal cancer group study. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(25):6199–206.
- The UK ACT II trial for anal canal cancer was a randomization of:
A. RT and two different chemotherapy regimens: MMC/5-FU versus CDDP/5-FU
B. Observation after chemoRT versus maintenance CDDP/5-FU for 2 cycles
C. IMRT + MMC/5-FU versus 3D RT + MMC/5-FU
D. A and B
- The correct answer is D. The ACT II trial was a 2 × 2 randomization. Nine hundred and forty patients were randomized to either arm 1 (RT 50.4 Gy/28 fractions + 5-FU 1,000 mg/m 2 days 1–4 and days 29–32 + cisplatin 60 mg/m 2 day 1 and day 29) or arm 2 (same RT and 5-FU + mitomycin 12 mg/m 2 day 1). Patients were then randomized to +/− maintenance chemo: arm 1 (cisplatin + 5-FU × 2 cycles) versus arm 2 (observation). Complete response did not differ between those receiving MMC versus cisplatin (~95 %). Comparing observa- tion after CRT versus maintenance chemotherapy, there was no difference in S. Chennupati et al. arnmayer@uni-mainz.de225 recurrence- free or overall survival, or the number of pretreatment colostomies reversed. James R et al. Randomized trial of chemoradiation using mitomycin or cisplatin, with or without maintenance cisplatin/5-FU in squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (ACT II). J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:18s. (ASCO abstract)
- A 66-year-old man with a T2N1 anal canal cancer is being evaluated for definitive chemotherapy and radiation. The addition of mitomycin C to 5-FU for systemic therapy with concurrent radiation has been shown to decrease:
A. Toxicity
B. Colostomy rate
C. Overall survival
D. Colostomy free survival
- The correct answer is B. RTOG 87-04 randomized approximately 300 patients to treatment with (1) RT (45–50.4 Gy) and 5-FU versus RT (45–50.4 Gy) and 5-FU+mitomycin. At 4 years of follow-up, colostomy rates were lower in the MMC arm (9 % vs. 22 %), as was local failure (16 % vs. 34 %). Colostomy-free survival was increased in the MMC arm (71 % vs. 59 %). Toxicity was increased in the MMC arm (23 % vs. 7 %). Overall survival was not signifi cantly different between the two arms. Despite its increased toxicity, this trial showed that MMC cannot be eliminated without a corresponding increase in colostomy rates and local failure. Flam et al. Role of mitomycin in combination with fl uorouracil and radiotherapy, and of salvage chemoradiation in the defi nitive nonsurgical treatment of epidermoid carcinoma of the anal canal: results of a phase III randomized intergroup study. J Clin Oncol. 1996;14(9):2527–39
- Which of the following would be classified as an anal margin tumor?
A. A lesion confined to within 5 cm of the anal verge, but not including the anal verge
B. A circumferential lesion confi ned to the anal canal
C. A lesion confi ned to 1 cm proximal to the anal verge
D. A lesion at the same level as the dentate line
- The correct answer is A. According to the NCCN Guidelines from 2012, the anal margin starts at the anal verge and includes the perianal skin over a 5–6 cm radius from the squamous mucocutaneous junction. Anal Cancer. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines ®) Version 2.2012.
- A 71-year-old woman with an ECOG 1 performance status presents with a 1 cm well- differentiated perianal squamous cell lesion within 1 cm of the anal verge. The lesion does not come into contact with the anal verge. Inguinal exam, gynecologic exam, and CT are negative for any other sites of disease. The recommended treatment of this lesion would be:
A. Cisplatin-based chemotherapy +/− radiation
B. MMC/5-FU-based chemoradiation
C. Abdominoperineal resection
D. Local excision
- The correct answer is D. This is technically an anal margin tumor. NCCN Guidelines recommend that it should be treated as if it were a skin cancer, i.e., local excision. If the lesion had come into contact with the anal verge or was unresectable, chemoRT could be considered. Anal Cancer. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines ®) Version 2.2012
- A 62-year-old woman was initially diagnosed with a T3N1 rectal adenocarcinoma 7 cm from the anal verge. She received preoperative chemoRT (CI 5-FU and 50.4 Gy to tumor), followed by a low anterior resection 6 weeks later. Upon final review of the pathology, the tumor was pT2 N0. She has since recovered from this procedure and has a performance status of ECOG 1. What is the most appropriate next treatment step for this patient?
A. Close observation with CT CAP and CEA annually for 3–5 years
B. Adjuvant oxaliplatin for 6 months
C. Adjuvant 5-FU and leucovorin for 6 months
D. Adjuvant oxaliplatin for 6 months
- The correct answer is C. This patient should receive adjuvant chemotherapy for 6 months with any of the following regimens: 5-FU+/−leucovorin, FOLFOX, and capecitabine +/− oxaliplatin. Rectal Cancer. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines ®) Version 3.2012
- A 68-year-old woman with a history of T2 N1 rectal adenocarcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CI 5-FU and 50.4 Gy to the primary), LAR, and 6 months of adjuvant chemotherapy is found to have a recurrence at the anastomotic site at her 2-year follow-up. performance status ECOG is 1. Restaging studies identify this as the only site of disease. The gross area of disease is technically resectable. Which of the following is true regarding her treatment options at this time?
A. Given the prior history of radiation, the risks of more radiation would outweigh the benefits.
B. Given the prior history of radiation, the risks of surgery would outweigh the benefits.
C. The only acceptable treatment at this time other than observation is chemotherapy.
D. Repeat radiation or chemoradiation, followed by surgery, may result in long- term local control.
- The correct answer is D. Several studies have shown that if appropriately man- aged, patients with a local recurrence can have good long-term control. Das et al. Hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy for rectal cancer in patients with prior pelvic irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;77(1):60–5. Valentini et al. Preoperative hyperfractionated chemoradiation for locally recur- rent rectal cancer in patients previously irradiated to the pelvis: a multicentric phase II study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;64(4):1129–39.