Stress - Social Psychological Explanation Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What are the Two Social Psychological Explanations of Stress?

A
  1. Life Events

2. Daily Hassles

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are Life Events?

A
  • Events that require significant adjustment/transitions
  • Can be both positive or negative
  • Common factor= that they will lead to significant adjustment in a person’s life
  • Seen as a key source of stress
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Who Came up with the Idea of Life Events?

How?

A
  • Dr Holmes investigated the link between stress + physical illness
  • Did research with TB patients showed that people who had become ill had also experienced an increase in amount of disturbing occurence in the 2 years prior to admission to a TB hospital
  • Led to Holmes + Rahe to develop life events
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are Social Readjustment Rating Scale?

A
  • Asked 394 participants to rate a list in terms of how much readjustment it would require
  • Consist of 43 items that were assigned a values known as a life change unit (LCU)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Give 3 example of Life Event + LCU + Place on SRRS

A
  1. Death of spouse = 100 LCU
  2. Divorce = 73 LCU
  3. Marriage = 50 LCU
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Describe the Importance of the Life Change Unit

A
  • The higher the score, the more likely a person is to suffer from stress + illness
  • A score of 150 increased the chances of getting ill by 30%
  • A score of 300 increased the chance of getting ill by 50%
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Describe the Procedure of Rahe’s 1970 Study.

A
  • Researchers used SRE (schedule of Recent Event) to asses 2684 navel personal severing on US Navy Cruisers
  • Participants required to complete before tour/during 6-8 months that followed - record kept of any illnesses men experienced
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Describe the Findings of Rahe’s Study.

A
  • Significant positive correlation - +1.18 between stressful life events = illness
  • As number of life events increased the more likely it was a person would get ill
  • Both positive + negative events included SRRS it appears that its change rather than negativity of change - important in creating stress
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Life Events Evaluation

Supporting Evidence

A
  • POSITIVE
  • Cohen (1993) = 394 participants got a variety of questionnaires to complete including a life events scale. Participants were exposed to common cold virus, quarantined + monitored for signs of inflection - higher life events scores were positively correlated with an increased risk of getting a cold - provides support
  • Researchers controlled for factors such as age + weight + still found a relationship between stress+subsequent vulnerability to illness - provides support
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Life Events Evaluation

Correlation + Causation

A
  • NEGATIVE
  • Research is correlation but does not prove causation
  • Other factors involved that mediate the relationship between life events + stress-related illness
  • Nuckolls (1972) = impact of life changes on complications in pregnancy - life changes score alone was not related to complications - 90% women with high life changes but low social support suffered complications - 33% of high life changes + high social support suffered complications - social support was an important intervening variable
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Life Events Evaluation

Issues with Recall

A
  • NEGATIVE
  • Recollections may not be accurate as it relies on people
  • Raphael (1991) = group of women report life events every month over 10 months - only 1/4 of events appeared on both lists
  • Checklist approach should not be used when looking at relationship + health outcome - too many factors involved + too many issues with method - interview method should be used - however, more difficulty to analyse/longer to conduct/less economically viable
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Life Events Evaluation

Cultural Differences

A
  • Scale was developed is the USA so its possible that different cultural groups might react differently
  • Events seem as stressful in one cultural group are not perceived in the same way as others due to difference in cultural beliefs + expectations - scale has a cultural bias
  • Zhang + Lin (1994) = looked at SRRS using Chinese participants - death of spouse was still most significant but there were significant differences e.g. death of a close family member was more stressful thane divorce
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Life Events Evaluation

Individual Difference

A
  • NEGATIVE
  • Major problem with life events to meaning + explaining stress id individual difference is the way events are perceived + the impact they will have
  • SRRS could be interpreted in a different was + lead to different levels of change therefore stress
  • SRRS criticised for being too narrowly focused on events specific to young adults (e.g. marriage+pregnancy)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are Daily Hassles?

A
  • Relatively minor everyday irritations trigger stress response
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are Uplifts?

A
  • The little things that lift our mood
  • Neutralise the harmful effects of hassles
  • Uplifts give breaks from hassles/give us energy to sustain any coping strategy to use
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the Impact of Daily Hassles on Stress + Health?

A
  • Close relationship between daily hassles + illnesses

- Stronger than relationship between life events + illness

17
Q

Describe Kanner’s 1981 Procedure

A
  • Longitudinal
  • Compare impact of life events + daily hassles
  • 100 participants aged between 45-65
  • Completed hassles + uplifts scale (HSUP) for events over the previous months + continued to do this once a month for 9 months
  • Questionnaire also used to measure participants’ mental health status + emotional response
18
Q

Describe the Findings of Kanner’s 1981 Research

A
  • Significant negative correlation between frequency of hassles + psychological response
  • Participants with fewest hassles showed highest levels of well being
  • Hassles were better predictor of well being than life events
  • Hassles were better predictors than uplifts
19
Q

Why Might Hassles have an Effect?

A
  1. Accumulation
  2. Amplification
  3. Lack of Social Support
20
Q

Describe the Accumulation Effect.

A
  • Build up of stress over time leads to a negative effect
  • Each hassles alone might not be stressful but if lots are experienced close together may led to an ongoing feeling of stress
21
Q

Describe Amplification

A
  • Chronic stress as a result of life changes makes people more vulnerable to the effects of daily hassles
  • Person already experiencing stress + resources are depleted
  • May find usual minor irritation difficult to cope with
22
Q

Describe How Lack of Social Support Effects Health

A
  • Flett (1995) = 320 students to read story about life events/daily hassles
  • Asked to rate amount of social support the person would seek
  • Life events were rated as being more in need of help
23
Q

What are the Most Common Hassles?

A
  • Concerns about weight = 52.4%
  • Health of a family member = 48.1%
  • Rising prices of common goods = 43.7%
24
Q

What are the Most Common Uplifts?

A
  • Relating well with a partner = 76.3%
  • Relating well with a friend = 74.4%
  • Completing a task = 73.3%
25
Q

Daily Hassles Evaluation

Supporting Evidence

A
  • POSITIVE
  • Strong relationship between hassles + negative health effect
  • Bouteyre (2007) = 233 French students as they moved from school to university - 41% sample suffered depressive symptoms - significant risk factors was daily hassles
  • Sheer (2004) = daily hassles correlated with increased cortisol levels in healthy individual + also contributed to development of depression in vulnerable individual
26
Q

Daily Hassles Evaluation

Age Difference

A
  • NEGATIVE
  • Changes of daily hassles across lifespan
  • Aldwin (2014) = longitudinal study of 1389 males aged between 48+101 - 48-70 participants experienced fewer hassles, more settled/used to dealing with situation - as participants grew older they showed an increase in hassles + decrease in uplifts, hassles experienced have more impact - suggest that as people age they become more adept at dealing with hassles - new problem emerge in older age becomes more difficult with them - fewer opportunities for uplifts - lead to stress
27
Q

Daily Hassles Evaluation

The Scale May Measure Psychiatric Problems Not Hassles

A
  • NEGATIVE
  • Dohrenwed (1984)= questioned use of the hassles scale to predict health changes - 371 clinical psychologists asked to assess instruments (e.g. HSUP) - found a large overlap between items on the scale + symptoms of a psychological disorder
  • Hassles scale actually measure psychiatric problems - correlation between hassles + psychological
28
Q

Daily Hassles Evaluation

Issues with Self-Report

A
  • NEGATIVE
  • Social desirability
  • Hassles are negative + people many feel reluctant to indicate that they have experienced them
  • Hassles relating to social relationship (e.g. arguing with family member) people unwilling
  • HSUP scale don’t allow individuals to select anything less than somewhat severe for each event- doesn’t allow to indicate that they experienced a hassle but not affected by it in anyway
  • Likely to be individual differences in perception + responses to hassles + scale not adequately allow for this
29
Q

Apply Daily Hassles to Modifying Stress: Savouring

A
  • In order yo modify stress individual needs to become adept at attaining the full benefits of any uplifts
  • Bryant introduced the concept in 2005
  • Linked to positive psychological approach
  • 3 main components
    1. Savouring through Anticipation
    2. Savouring though Reminiscing
    3. Savouring the Moment
  • Example = laughing about experience
  • Hurley+Kwon (2013) = interaction uplifts + how much individual savoured positive emotions/moments they experienced - most risk of negative effects to their well being were those with low levels of uplifts + low savouring - low levels of positive affect + satisfaction with life - in contrast group with low levels of uplifts but high savouring showed similar positive responses to those with high uplift levels