Addiction: Social Psychological Explanation Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What are the Social Psychological Explanations of Addiction?

A
  1. Peer Influence

2. Role of the Media

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Who Proposed the Social Learning Theory?

A
  • Bandura (1977/86)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Describe the Social Learning Theory

A
  • Emphasizes the role of social factor on behavior
  • Behavioral approach - learning through reinforcement
  • Includes indirect reinforcement
  • Known as SLT because you can learn indirectly through other’s behavior
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How is the Learner Motivated?

A
  1. Observing a Role Model (watching someone who you identify with + adrenaline
  2. Vicarious Reinforcement (role model reinforced in behavior the individual anticipates similar outcome + rewards for themselves)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Apply SLT to Addictive Behavior. (Smoking)

A
  • Individual sees their peers smoking
  • Peers might be people they look up to (Role Models)
  • Peers are being rewarded through having a higher social status + seen to be enjoying it
  • Therefore individual engages in behavior
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are Social Norms?

A
  • Rules of behavior that are consided acceptable within particular social groups
  • Perceptions of norms among peer groups can effect an individual’s behavior
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What Examples of Social Norms?

A
  1. Descriptive Norms

2. Injunctive Norms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Describe Descriptive Norms

A
  • An individual’s perception of how much others engage in behavior
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Describe Injunctive Norms

A
  • What an individuals perceives as other’s approval of their behavior
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Apply Social Norms to Addiction (Alcohol)

A
  • Perkins + Berkowitz (1986)
  • High proportion of students believed being intoxicated was only acceptable in limited circumstances
  • High proportion believed it was acceptable
  • Individuals act in way they think group is acting
  • See no need to reduce their consumption as they think that everyone else is doing it more then they are
  • Students overestimate descriptive + injunctive norms - believe that peers are drinking more alcohol + that it’s more socially acceptable
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Peer Influence Evaluation

Research Evidence

A
  • POSITIVE
  • Simons-Mortant + Fachat (2010) = reviewed 40 prospective studies into relationship peers + smoking - found that all but one showed a positive correlation
  • Research supports link between behavior of peers + engagement in addictive behavior - prospective studies provide stronger evidence of a causal relationship
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Peer Influence Evaluation

Peer Influence or Peer Selection

A
  • NEGATIVE
  • Key problem with research is whether peer influence the individuals to engage in behavior or whether individual chooses friends as they also engage in behavior
  • Ennett + Bauman (1994) = participants who didn’t smoke at start of study + who had friends who smoked were more likely to smoke at follow up
  • Evidence suggests individual had changed membership of friendship groups in line with their (non)smoking friends
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Peer Influence Evaluation

Perceived Social Norms

A
  • NEGATIVE
  • Neighbors (2007) = number of factors related to alcohol consumption + found descriptive + injunctive norms were the best predictors of alcohol consumption amougst college students - supports idea peer influence engagement in addictive behavior
  • Not best predictor of alcohol problems (e.g. Drink driving) - peers may influence to engage in addictive behavior but other factors may be more important in influencing whether individuals becomes addicted
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Peer Influence Evaluation

Methodological Issues

A
  • NEGATIVE
  • Majority of research in this area involves self report + correctional research - both have issues associated
  • Defining a peer relationship is very difficult - friend groups change over time + people associated with different people for different activities
  • Students are more accurate in their perception of their best friend’s drinking habits then they are of others - peer influence = too broad
  • Difficult to conduct experimental studies on humans - impossible to manipulate who an individual are friends with
  • Smith (2012) = rats more likely to self-administer cocaine when they’re with another rat who has also got access to cocaine compared with a rat that was present but who didn’t have access to cocaine
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Applying Peer Influence to Modifying Addiction - Social Norms Marketing

A
  • Aims to change student’s perception of their peer’s drinking habits through use of mass media marketing
  • Adverts focus on providing statistics about how much teenagers typically drink
  • Gives students more accurate information that will help combat the overestimation of social norms
  • Results were mixed but remains popular in USA
  • Moore (2013) = trail across Welsh Unis by using beer mats/leaflets/posters displaying information targeting both descriptive + injuctive norms
  • Students who could recall the materials reported lower perceived norms - effects on alcohol consumption was unclear
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How does the Social Learning Theory Apply to the Media?

A
  • Film star/celebrity/character acts as a role model + the vicarious reinforcement
  • Need to consider how the media portrays addictive behaviour + whether or not this exposure has an effect
17
Q

How does the Media Expose People to Addictive Behaviours?

A
  • Smoking + alcohol is very common in films + television
  • Lyons (2013) = alcohol was seen in 86% of popular UK films + in 40% of TV programmes
  • Glantz (2002) = compared smoking seen in films from 1950-1982 - found a decrease 1950-1982 - increases again up to similar levels seen in 1950
18
Q

Describe How Vicarious Reinforcement Applies to the Role of the Media

A
  • Behaviour are seen both more frequently + in a positive light
  • Gunasekera (2005) = 87/200 top films in the past 20 years using content analysis - tobacco + alcohol use was most common
  • Addiction portrayed positively + without negative consequences - provides vicarious reinforcement
19
Q

Describe the Exposure Effect in the Role of Media

A
  • Wellman (2006) = How exposure to tobacco advertising + use of tobacco in films influenced children’s attitudes to smoking - exposure t marketing + media promoting smoking increased positive attitudes - doubled chances of starting smoking
  • Hanewinkel (2014) = teenagers from a range of European cultures who never wanted to drink alcohol - results from a follow up 12 months later :
  • 40% tried alcohol
  • 9% engaged in binge drinking
20
Q

Explain the Correlation Between Gambling, Addiction + Media Influence

A
  • Increase in gambling advertising may contribute to gambling addiction by introducing individuals to gambling/ triggering a relapse
  • Dervesky (2012) = teenagers who already gamble are more likely influenced by advertising + when the adverts promotes gambling as a glamorous + social activity where winning is easy - increase in gambling advertising is a relatively recent development may be some time until the effects are fully seen.
21
Q

Role of the Media Evaluation

Difficulty Establishing a Causal Link

A
  • NEGATIVE
  • Majority of research into media + addiction is correlational - cause + effect cannot be established
  • May not be the media causing the addiction but friend/family influence in what’s viewed
  • Pechmann + Shih (1999) = used experimental method to assess the effect of smoking portray attitudes to smoking. They used 2 versions of same film. V1 contained smoking V2 didn’t. Those who saw V1 reported to have more positive attitudes towards smoking + increased personal intentions to smoke
22
Q

Role of the Media Evaluation

Lack of Population Validity

A
  • NEGATIVE
  • Adolescents are too susceptible to social influence + therefore the effects are easily detected
  • Effects may be different in adults
  • However - Jamison + Bomber (2011) = results in adults are very similar
23
Q

Role of the Media Evaluation

Adolescents View of the Media

A
  • NEGATIVE
  • Atkinson (2011) = acknowledge that drinking alcohol was often seen as glamorous - adolescents interviewed were aware that images of people were exaggerated for effect
24
Q

Role of the Media Evaluation

The Media can have a Positive Effect

A
  • POSITIVE
  • Contribute to reduction of addictive behaviour
  • Pechmann - effects of showing film were cancelled out by showing an anti-smoking advert before film