Addiction: Individual Difference Explanation Flashcards
What are the Individual Differences Explanations of Addiction?
- Cognitive Bias
2. Addictive Personality Traits
What is Cognitive Bias?
- Focuses on the way people think about a behavior
- If human behavior was rational then we wouldn’t become addicted because costs would outweigh the benefits - errors of thinking
What are the Two Main Cognitive Biases?
- Representativness Bias
2. Availability Bias
Describe Representativness Bias
- Estimate likelihood of an event by comparing it to an existing prototype
- Mind’s prototype what we think is most relevant/typical example of event/object
- More likely to overestimate likelihood that something will occur
- Tendency to judge the frequency/likelihood of an event bu the the extent to which it resembles the typical case
What is the Gambler’s Fallacy?
- Representitiveness Bias
- The belief that if something happens more frequently than normal it will happen less frequently in the future
Describe the Availability Bias
- Works on the principle that an event is seen as more likely if it’s easier to recall from memory
- People make decisions based on how often they hear about something + how available information is rather than actual probability of it occurring
- Encourage people to engage + continue with behavior in the mistaken belief that they are likely to win
- Mistaken belief may have come media reports - make events seem more likely than they are
Describe the Illusion of Control Bias?
- Gamblers falsely believe that it they can control some aspects of the process their chances of winning will be improved
- Example = Choosing a particular seat at a roulette table
Describe the Hindsight Bias?
- Gambler will claim that they’re not surprised by outcome + could have predicted what the outcome would be
- Helps to maintain the belief that once their skills have improved they will be able to win consistently
Describe the Self-Serving Bias
- Tendency of gamblers to attribute any wins to internal causes (e.g. own skill) and any losses to external causes (e.g bad luck)
- Helps them to feel it’s not their fault if they loose and should continue to gamble
Cognitive Bias Evaluation
Supporting Evidence
- POSITIVE
- Griffiths (1994) = compared verbaisations of regular gamblers with non-gamblers - evidence showed more irrational verbalisations made by regular. These verbalisations show evidence of cognitive bias
- Joukhador (2003) = Developed a 65 item scale called the Gambling Belief Questionnaire - covers a range of cognitive bias - taken by problem gamblers - the problem gamblers scored higher in almost all different beliefs assessed
Cognitive Bias Evaluation
Research Issues
- NEGATIVE
- Relays on participants to report what they’re thinking - creates s range of problems
- Griffiths (1994) = Researchers decide what a bias is being shown - researcher bias
- Questionnaires rely on gamblers being honest in what they’re thinking - issues created such as demand characteristics + social desirability
Cognitive Bias Evaluation
Descriptive or Explanation
- NEGATIVE
- Cognitive bias provides a description of thoughts of gamblers rather than an explanation of what causes gambling
- Explanation of behavior should be able to predict what’ll happen in certain circumstance - feature of a cognitive bias is that it’ s impossible to predict when a particular bias may be used
Cognitive Bias Evaluation
Everyone Exhibits Cognitive Bias
- NEGATIVE
- Cognitive biases found amongst gamblers/non-gamblers/those who gamble but aren’t addicted
- Gamblers may have more cognitive bias/apply heuristics inappropriately
- Babsoushkin (2001) = many heuristics are appropriate for everyday situation but not chance events - gamblers fail to recognize this
Applying Cognitive Biases to Modifying Addiction: Cognitive Restructuring
- Clients are taught they have in gambling are irrational
- Griffiths (1994) = Verbalisations - asked gamblers to listen/highlight irrational nature- regular gamblers were surprised at what they heard - suggesting that they find they find it useful in overcoming problems
- Forture + Goodie (2012) = Report that some studies used parts of a broader CBT while others focus on correcting beliefs/biases - both methods have shown some success
Explain Eyesenck’s Theory of Personality
- 3 dimensions related to personality upon which personality can be measured
1. Extroversion/Introversion- Extroverts = sociable/lively/optimistic
- Introverts = reserved/quiet
- Neuroticism/Stability
- Neurotics = high anxiety/moody/irritable
- Stability = controlled/even tempered
- Psychoticism/Normality
- Psychoticism = impulsive/impatient/aggressive/creative