State Responsibility Flashcards

1
Q

Explain what primary rules are in international law on State Responsibility

A

-roles which create obligations or confer rights to the subject

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Explain waht secondary rules are in International Law on State Responsibility

A

-consequences are in vio. of prim. rules
-alter + creation + exception to prim. rules

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

TRUE or FALSE: ARSIWA is a hard law document

A

FALSE: ARSIWA is soft law
-noted by GA in 2001
-CIL

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

List the elements of state responsibility

A
  1. Act
  2. International law obligation violated
  3. Attribution
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Define what an international obligation is

A

-Any obligation under international law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Which acts of a state can violate an international obligation

A

-Any act or omission

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Where are the key elements of state responsibility laid out in case law?

A

-Tehran Hostages Case–> attribution to state + violation of INTL ob.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What did the Salvador commercial case confirm?

A

-A state is responsible for the acts of its rulers
-whether they belong 2 leg., execu. or judicial dep. of the Gov.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What did the Heirs of the Duc de Guise case confirm?

A

-Doesn’t matter if decision maker is central or regional authorities
-still imput. 2 state

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

TRUE or FALSE: what state organs are is determined by national law

A

TRUE: Art. 4(2) ARSIWA

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What did the Velasquez Rodriguez case confirm in terms of state responsbility?

A

-doesn’t matter if organ contravened state law/ order
-still constitutes action of the state

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What the Nicaragua case confirm in terms of attribution?

A

-in order 2 establish that a a non stage organ + not given legal powers
-force’s actions are attributable to the state
- need to prove effect. control
-direct perpetration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What did the Bolivar Railway Company case conclude about attribution?

A

-State responsibility can be attributed to insurrectional or other movements
-IF they become a state

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Which notions of attribution were applied in the Tehran Hostages Case?

A

-Conduct of organs of a state
-Art. 4 ARSIWA
-Omission of carrying out due dilligence in iviolab. of dip. premises
-Actions adopted
-Art. 11 ARSIWA
-holding diplomatic off. hos.
-state adop + endorse (seal of gov. approval)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Are there any justifications for state responsibility?

A

Yes- Circumstances precluding wrongfulnss

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

List the cirrcumstances precluding wrongfulness

A
  1. Consent
  2. Self-defence
  3. Countermeasures
  4. Force majeure
  5. Distress
    6.Necessiry
17
Q

Define what a countermeasure is

A

-response 2 a violation of oblig of intl law
-thru vio. 2 induce fulfillment

18
Q

What did the Cysne case conclude in terms of circumstances precluding wrongfulness?

A

-CM can only be invoked against the injur. state
-not the allies

18
Q

What did the Savakar case conclude in terms of circumstances precluding wrongfulness

A

-Exemplified how CONSENT
=cpw

19
Q

Where are the articles on invocation of responsibility by an injured state?

A

-Art. 42-48 ARSIWA

20
Q

What did the Gabcikovo-Nagymaros Project conclude about conditions precluding wronfulness?

A
  • C.50
  • State of necessity–> have to be
    -1. only means of safeguarding an ess. interest
    -2.C.51 “grave and imminient periri
    3. Countermeasure has to be proportionate (C.87)