Sperry's study Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What does contralateral mean?

A

Each hemisphere in our brain controls the opposite side of our body.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is lateralisation of function?

A

The speciality of each area of the brain

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the corpus collosum?

A

A bundle of fibres that connects the two hemispheres of the brain

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is a commissurotomy?

A

The operation which severed the corpus collosum

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What was the aim of Sperry’s study?

A

To study the effects of brain hemisphere disconnection and the functions of the separated hemispheres

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What type of experiment is Sperry’s study and What is the evidence?

A

A Quasi experiment
The main IV was whether the participants had a split-brain or not. This was already done and having the surgery had nothing to do with Sperry.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what is the background to Sperry’s study?

A

The language abilities of the left hemisphere were just identified in the 19th century by Broca and Wernicke. They each studied patients with brain damage to key areas of the brain and found it led to deficits in language.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are Broca and Wernicke’s areas for?

A

Broca’s area is responsible for speech production

Wernicke’s area is responsible for speech comprehension.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What was the sample of Sperry’s study?

A

Used 11 patients who had severe epilepsy and who had previously undergone a commissurotomy (compared against those who had not had surgery - control group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What were the weaknesses of Sperry’s study?

A

There was a small number and had limited generalisability because it was only people with epilepsy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What was the equipment used in Sperry’s study?

A

Tachistoscope
back projector
objects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What was the visual part of Sperry’s study?

A

The participants were asked to fix their eyes of a fixation point in the middle of a screen. A stimulus was projected on either the left or right side of the middle of the screen for less than 1/10 of a second.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What was the tactile part of Sperry’s study?

A

Two different objects were placed in each hand, then hidden for retrieval amongst a pile of objects.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are two examples of stimuli shown to participants in Sperry’s study?

A

Hammer

Ball

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What were the conclusions of Sperry’s study?

A

One half of the brain does not know what the other half is doing
The left hemisphere is responsible for language, especially speech and writing - It can communicate from the right visual field or the right side of the body.
The right hemisphere can’t speak/write - can show non-verbally that mental processes from left visual field and left side of the body are present.
Therefore a useful application of this knowledge would be the medical profession who can help patients with similar disorders.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How good is Sperry’s study ethically?

A

No ethical guidelines were broken - participants fully consented.

17
Q

Did Sperry’s study have internal reliability?

A

Yes, it was very standardised and had lots of controls.

18
Q

Did Sperry’s study have external reliability?

A

They did show a consistent effect but there weren’t really enough participants (only 11) and they had individual medical differences

19
Q

Did Sperry’s study have internal (construct) validity?

A

no because We don’t know why they were laughing and giggling about the naked woman
but yes because the findings did show lateralisation of function

20
Q

Did Sperry’s study have external (population) validity?

A

It isn’t generalisable as there was a very small sample size and the participants had experienced different levels of commissurotomy so doesn’t represent people with epilepsy that haven’t had the surgery.

21
Q

Did Sperry’s study have external (ecological) validity?

A

The visual task: not really - findings would not be found in regular life as stimuli are not selectively directed towards a single hemisphere
The tactile task: Yes as holding something in only one hand is likely to happen in real life.

22
Q

When objects are presented to the right visual field, where does the information go?

A

Left hemisphere

23
Q

What could the participant do in Sperry’s study when objects were presented in the left visual field?

A

They could point to a matching object or draw the objects, despite insisting that they couldn’t see anything.

24
Q

What could the participant do in Sperry’s study when objects were presented in the right visual field?

A

Participants described it in a speech and written format.

25
Q

What happened when participants in Sperry’s study were presented with a nude pin up to the left visual field?

A

The would giggle/ look embarrassed but could not say why and this suggests that the right hemisphere is its own conscious entity.

26
Q

What could the participant do in Sperry’s study when objects were felt by the right hand only?

A

They described the object by name in speech and in writing

27
Q

What could the participant do in Sperry’s study when objects were felt by the left hand only?

A

They could feel it with their left hand - by touch and in a bag of objects. When the objects were placed in one hand, they could point to where the object was with the same hand that held the object.

28
Q

Was Sperry’s study ethnocentric?

A

Since brain lateralisation is affected by anatomy and physiognomy of our brain, it wasn’t ethnocentric as it investigated species specific behaviour. However, Sperry notes that there were individual differences between participant and our brain development is influenced by our environment and culture so it might be that people not brought up in a western culture may have reacted differentlt.

29
Q

How does Sperry’s study link to the psychology as a science debate?

A

It is replicable - testable (falsifiable) and is objective as pretty much everything was factual

30
Q

How does Sperry’s study link to the reductionism vs holism debate?

A

It was very reductionist as it only looked at the brain/biology, not any other explanations.

31
Q

How does Sperry’s study link to the free-will/ determinism debate?

A

Mainly determinism as it was biological determini9sm - dictated by the brain structure
got the surgery of their own free will

32
Q

How does Sperry’s study link to the socially sensitive research debate?

A

It could result in stigmas or discrimination towards people who had undergone this surgery.

33
Q

How does Sperry’s study link to the individual/situational debate?

A

Their brain structure was specific to them so was individual, however the equipment to analyse this was a very specific situation, so could have influenced their behaviour