Debates Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What are the four broader ethical principles?

A

respect
competence
responsibility
integrity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the six specific ethical guidelines?

A
Informed consent
Right to withdraw
Confidentiality
Debrief
Protection from harm
Deception
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Which specific ethical guidelines are within the respect guideline?

A

Informed consent
Right to withdraw
confidentiality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Which specific ethical guidelines are within the responsibility guideline?

A

Protection from harm

debrief

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Which specific ethical guidelines are within the Integrity guideline?

A

Deception

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the three benefits of psychological research being ethical?

A

It is good that participants are treated well: we wouldn’t like it if we were treated with a lack of respect.
It enhances the reputation of psychology as an academic discipline
Researchers are more likely to get other participants for psychological research in the future if they can see participants are treated well.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the three drawbacks of psychological research being ethical?

A

It can place limits on the sort of research carried out (preventing research that might be really worthwhile from being done)
It can reduce the validity of research if participants know the aim of a study (as this can lead to them not behaving as they normally would)
Sampling bias can be a problem if participants are able to withdraw (i.e. you get left with a sample that isn’t as representative as it should be

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the situational explanation?

A

It suggests that behaviour is best explained by reference to the situation or circumstances a person is in. At its most extreme, this explanation would suggest that anyone put in a particular situation would behave in the same way

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the individual explanation?

A

It suggests that behaviour is best explained as arising from a person’s own personality or characteristics. At its most extreme, this explanation could suggest that a person’s behaviour wouldn’t change no matter the situation they’re in.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are two strengths of the individual explanation?

A

It helps us to understand why people behave the way they do

It is useful - we could try placing people in jobs on the basis of their personality characteristics.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are two strengths of the situational explanation?

A

Helps us to understand why people behave the way they do

It is useful - we can alter behaviour by altering the situations that create it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are two weaknesses of the situational explanation?

A

It is socially sensitive - Could be used as an excuse to explain away bad behaviour
Reductionist - misses out individual factors as an explanation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are two weaknesses of the individual explanation?

A

It has limited usefulness - if a person’s personality is the reasin why they behave the way they do, then this will not be easy to change
Reductionist - misses out situational factors as an explanation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What does the nature position suggest?

A

That we are the product of our genetic inheritance, such that how we behave is due to factors innate within us

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What does the nurture position suggest?

A

That we are the products of our upbringings, such that how we behave is due to your personal encounters and experiences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are two strengths of the nature position?

A

Could potentially be useful, albeit only by pointing towards genetic modification or other biological interventions
Probably not ethnocentric as biological factors will affect people the same way anywhere

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What are three weaknesses of the nature position?

A

It has limited usefulness: it may not be possible to do anything to change a person’s nature
Reductionist: it can mean missing out the impact of nurture
Could be socially sensitive if identifying a problem that someone can’t change about themselves.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What are three weaknesses of the nurture position?

A

Reductionist: it can mean missing out the impact of nature
Might be ethnocentric as cultures will vary in how people are brought up within them
Could be socially sensitive, leading children to blame their parents for how they were brought up.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What is a strength of the nurture position?

A

Can be useful, suggesting ways to change behaviour by changing how a child is brought up.

20
Q

What does research being useful mean?

A

It has practical application

21
Q

What are three benefits of psychological research being useful?

A

It can have positive applications that can improve the quality of people’s lives
If research is likely to have practical applications then it is more likely to attract funding, making it more likely that the research will actually be carried out
It can improve the reputation of psychology as an academic subject

22
Q

What are four drawbacks of psychological research being useful?

A

Research which is useful can be put to bad uses too
if two people on opposite sides (e.g. Lawyers) both make use of the same psychological insight, then the usefulness of the research is cancelled out
If it is implied that research ought to be useful then psychologists might not do ‘pure’ research that isn’t useful now but could be useful in the future
If it is all important that research is useful, then this could put preserve on researchers to breach some of the ethical guidelines

23
Q

According to the reductionist approach, how can human behaviour be explained?

A

arising from simple processes (e.g. because of hormones, or because of which behaviour has been rewarded in the past

24
Q

According to the holistic approach, how can human behaviour be explained?

A

It should be viewed s the product of different influences which all interact

25
Q

According to the reductionist approach, how should research be conducted?

A

By isolating variables one at a time to establish cause and effect

26
Q

According to the holistic approach, how should research be conducted?

A

Psychologists should develop multi-factor models or conduct case studies hat capture all the different influences on a person’s behaviour

27
Q

What are three strengths of the reductionist approach to psychology?

A

It allows psychological research to be more scientific
Studies which take this approach make it possible to draw more detailed conclusions about cause and effect because they tend to be more highly controlled
As studies which take this approach are often more replicable, enabling researchers to repeat studies to see if there is a reliable effect

28
Q

What are three weaknesses of the reductionist approach to psychology?

A

Human behaviour is often too complex to be reduced down to single-factor explanations
Focusing in on one factor at a time can result in other variables being left out
Studies which take a reductionist approach are often highly controlled experiments and, as such can lack ecological validity

29
Q

What are two strengths of the holistic approach to psychology?

A

It gives a more complete explanation
Research is not limited to single area or perspective so can consider different explanations for the behaviour being investigated

30
Q

What are two weaknesses of the holistic approach to psychology?

A

It can be difficult for researchers to pin don which, out of many different factors, is having the causal effect.
Holistic explanations can only be verified by separating out the different elements within them and testing them one by ne to confirm that all the different factor withing them do actually play a part in explaining the behaviour in question.

31
Q

What does the freewill position propose?

A

that our behaviour is the product of our own choice such that we are able to choose how we behave

32
Q

What does the determinist position suggest?

A

that our behaviour is caused by factors outside of our control. factors that determine hoe we behave cold be genetic or to do with our upbringings or physical or social circumstances

33
Q

What are two strengths of the free will position?

A

Not socially sensitive - people will often like to feel that they have control over their behaviour
Useful - people can be held accountable for the behaviours they carry out.

34
Q

What are two weaknesses of the free will position?

A

Unscientific - is free will just the way we explain behaviour that we can’t explain in any other way?
Socially sensitive - people may find it uncomfortable being told that they are responsible for how they choose to act.

35
Q

What are three weaknesses of the determinism position?

A

Reductionist - maybe behaviour isn’t so easily explained
Open to negative uses - for example, lawyers could use determinist explanations to get guilty people acquitted
Socially sensitive - people may find it uncomfortable being told that they are not in control of how they behave

36
Q

What are two strengths of the determinism position?

A

Open to positive uses - if we know what causes a wanted behaviour, we can make the behaviour occur again
Scientific - determinist explanations often arise from controlled experiments in which cause and effect has been established

37
Q

What does socially sensitive research mean?

A

When the research could lead to prejudice or discrimination against the class of people represented by those in the study

38
Q

What are two benefits of psychological research being socially sensitive?

A

It can answer important questions that improve our understanding of human behaviour
It can lead to practical applications that can improve the quality of people’s lives

39
Q

What are two drawbacks of psychological research being socially sensitive?

A

It can lead to people beyond the study being stigmatised

The insight it provides can be used for negative purposes

40
Q

What are the three features of a science?

A

replicability
Falsifiability
Objectivity

41
Q

What does replicability mean?

A

Research should be able to be repeated again on different participants, but the results should remain the same.

42
Q

What does falsifiability mean?

A

Claims that are made by researchers should be able to be scientifically tested and proven wrong

43
Q

What does objectivity mean?

A

Research should be based on facts that can be scientifically recorded rather than personal opinions and beliefs.

44
Q

What are four benefits of psychological research being scientific?

A

Quantitative data us often gathered which can be analysed to see significant effects
Scientific research is less vulnerable to being affected by researcher bias
Scientific research typically involves the use of laboratory experiments that enable cause and effect to be inferred
Controlled laboratory experiments can be replicated to see if findings are reliable.

45
Q

What are three drawbacks of psychological research being scientific?

A

Scientific research is often lacking in qualitative data (and therefore its explanatory power is reduced)
The research is often reductionist because it tries to test the impact of a single factor; such as, it can miss out other factors that might be involved
Scientific studies are often conducted in tightly controlled laboratory settings, which can reduce the ecological validity of the findings