some theories for group psychology Flashcards
intergroup contact theory
meaningful, collaborative interactions between members of different social identity groups can decrease prejudice (Gordon W. Allport)
realistic conflict theory
by Sherif, intergroup hostility and conflict tend to arise when groups compete for limited resources (material goods//power//social status)
this competition leads to formations of outgroup and ingroup dynamics, which result in animosty, prejudice, discrimination bwtween the two groups
minimal group paradigm
a social psychology research methodology that states that the minimal condition for one group to discriminate the other group biases (such as favouritism towards your in group or prejudice against your out group) is being a member of a group
hawthorne effect
individuals modify their behaviours if they are aware of the fact that they are being observed
field experiment
a field experiment is a research method that measures how the manipulation of the IV (independent variable) affect the DV (dependant variable)
in a natural, real world environmented
a type of an experiment that takes place outside of a controlled setting laboratory, in a natural, real-world environment
research method that uses some controlled elements of traditional lab experiments, but takes place in natural, real-world settings.
advantages of field experiment
- high (ecological) validity, as the behaviours which are being observed are natural and observed in a natural real life setting
higher in mundane realism than lab experiments
-reduce chances of demand characteristics and hawthorne effect
- good for establishing cause and effect relationships, as researchers manipulate a variable and masure its effect however confounding veriables make this hard i bam przechodzisz do disadvantages
disadvantage//advantage
the study could lack reliability, as the researchers are with the boys for only 12 hours and they cannot see and hear everything that takes place.
HOWEVER
Sheriff took this into consideration and he made measures in order for the study to have higher reliability, such as using numbered scoring systems for the boys friendship patterns, which collected quantitative data, he also recorded the boys’ conversations in order to analyse them. he also used multiple observers for interrater reliability
disadvantages of participant observations
- researchers have less control over confounding variables which might affect the results, reducing the validity between the cause and effect relatinshp
(so many different variables also make it harder to generalise data)
-hard to generalise
- Hawthorne effect (individuals tend to adapt their behaviours, if they are aware of the fact that they are being observed)
(HOWEVER) Sherif limited this factor by deceiving his participants, who were unaware of the fact that they are participating in a psychological study and simply thought they are at a summer camp)
-which then raises several ethical concerns, with regards to the lack of informed consent from the participants, although he did get consent from the subject’s parents on their behalf. the researchers must also ensure that the boys’ privacy and autonomy is protected
(and generally speaking, the deceival of participat is necesarry qute often, when conducting field experiments and informed consents are big problems)
lab experiment
a type of an experiment that uses a strictly controlled setting and standardised procedure to measure accurately measure how changes in the IV affect the DV
advantage of lab experiment
- replicability (it gives the study higher validity; when the results from one study are consisted with the results of other studies)
- standardisation (researchers can ensure all participants are subjected to the same conditions, which reduces the risks of confounding variables affecting the results
disadvantage of lab experiment
- low ecological validity (which makes the study harder to generalise) (it is an artificial study that does not reflect a real life setting)
-response bias (when a participant provides inaccurate answers, as they feel like this is what the researcher wants them to do; the participants may be rewarding their ingroup, because they feel as though this is what the researchers want them to do.)
prejudice
an attitude towards an individual, because of a characteristics attributed to them, based on the groups they belong to
discrimination
a behaviour consisting of treating an individual differently, due to them being a part of a certain group, instead of individual merit
confounding variables
a third, unmeasured variable, which may influence both the supposed cause as well as the supposed effect, which influences the results of the study