somatosensory part 4 Flashcards

1
Q

where is the somatosensory cortex in the brain

A

post central gyrus (immediately behind the central sulcus)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

the primary somatosensory cortex consists of which brodmanns areas

A

3a, 3b, 1 and 2

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

the posterior parietal cortex consists of which brodmanns areas

A

5 and 7

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is the primary somatosensory cortex shortened to

A

S1 (or SI - roman numeral 1)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

magnification factor of somatotopic map =

A

area of cortical representation: area on body surface
hands and mouth have a larger area of cortex

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

VPL (ventro-posterior lateral nucleus) and VPS (ventro-posterior superior nucleus) in the thalamus sends parallel connectiosn to 3a,3b,1,2. There are also connections between the different cortical areas themselves. the flow of information is from…

A

left to right (3a –> 2)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

if you lesion the hand area in 3b and 3a you silences the equivalent region in area 1. is this the same in the opposite direction

A

no

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

possible mechanisms of plasticity for remapping

A

sleeping synapses awakened when normal input is lost
or
there’s formation of new lateral connections
(example: when hand was amputated and individual felt sensation of amputated hadn in the face - phantom limb syndrome)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

area 3a

A

mostly deep receptors (muscle spindle and joint receptors - proprioceptive info)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

area 3b

A
  • cutaneous input from RA1 and SA1
  • receptive fields are small and simple
  • receptive fields show surround inhibition and excitatory centre (inhibition surrounding the excitation)
  • convergence of many skin receptor inputs on to one cortical receptive field
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

area 1

A
  • cutaneous
  • centre surround
  • larger receptive fields than 3b
  • some proprioceptive input
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

area 2

A
  • cutaneous, especially hand area
  • many proprioceptive
  • neurons that are sensitive to movement /direction/ orientation selectivity
  • receptive fields may extend into other digits (biparitie)
  • some neurones respond better to grasping particular objects shapes e.g ball vs bar
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

powell and mountcastle (1959)
columnar organisation of the cortex

A

neurones are organised in columns which have similar properties associated with them
the columns run normal to the surface of the cortex
cells in the same column share the same receptor modality and represent the same skin locations
they also presented evidence for alternate input (SA/RA and cutaneous/deep receptors) for neighbouring digits

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

when the electrode was put in normal to the cortex there was either only cutaneous or deep input

A

when the electrode is put across layers you can see both cutaneous and deep input

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

neurons with similar receptor input were clustered together on the cortical surface

A

suggests function is the property of single receptor type
SA1 thought to be responsible for texture discrimination
and RA1 for detection of stimulus movement
(sub modality segregation hypothesis - specific functions are related to a specific receptor type and theyre segregated in that way)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

hypothesis for receptor input to cortical neurons
submodality segregation

A

individual receptor types identified at the skin level, their properties remain segregated that the cortical level

17
Q

submodality convergence

A

they don’t remain segregated at the cortical level
they get input from other receptors
if this is true then at the cortical level neurons cant be purely SA or RA type neurones there must be inputs from both receptor types

18
Q

submodality convergence hypothesis:
- responses assessed with limited stimulus set, not more complex natural stimuli, may miss what is really responds to
- evidence that one receptor may be insufficient in order toc code all aspects of a particular feature - e.g movement aid fine texture discrimination

A

for any particular task of recognition you benefit by having more than one type of receptor contributing to that process

19
Q

bensmaia found neurone that has an onset response, sustained component and an offset response

A

appear to get both SA and RA input
they also found neurons that have orientation selectivity (bar on the monkeys skin in different orientations caused a change in response)
orientation signal is minimal during onset and offset
this suggests the SA1 input is responsible for the orientation selectivity
the RA input is also present but not orientation selective
they found that the times when the firing rate was the highest (onset and offset), that this is where the orientation response was minimal
evidence that the cortical neurones are getting input from different types of receptors
neurone recorded in 3b

20
Q

sa1

A

shape and texture

21
Q

RA

A

motion and grip control

22
Q

PC

A

vibrations

23
Q

the responses of neurones become for complex in the higher areas (towards area 2)

A

curvature selective neurones in area 2
there is a preference for one angle over the others

24
Q

behavioural study (randolph and semmes 1974)
trained monkeys to do a set of different discriminations, some were texture and other were angle shape discriminations
they then made lesions in area 3b, 1 and 2 in different animals

A

the 3b area lesion caused the animals to be impaired in both the texture and angle/shape discriminations
lesion in area 1, the animals were impaired in the texture discrimination only
in they lesioned area 2 the animal was impaired in the angle/shape discrimination only
area 3b is necessary for both discriminations
area 1 is more involved in texture discrimination
area 2 is more involved in angle/shape discrimination

25
Q

astereognosis in patients with posterior S1 (~area 2) cortical lesions from stroke

A
  • severe deficits in discriminating spheres from ellipses
  • affects hand contralateral to lesion
  • also deficits in passive position and movement of limbs
  • drug block of cortical area 2 in monkey leads to deficits in complex hand movement
26
Q

behind the S1 is the posterior parietal cortex (area 5 and 7)

A

this is known as the association cortex
the input received by this cortex are from other cortical areas
area 5 main input is from area 1, 2 and 3, it also gets thalamic input
area 7 gets input from the prestriate visual cortex and the thalamus. the auditory cortex and the hippocampus (spatial memory)
- outputs of these areas go to premotor and motor cortex and to basal ganglia

27
Q

area 5

A
  • complex
  • fields may cover more than one limb
  • activated by specific hand postures (grasping, reaching, manipulating)
  • after damage to this area you cant recognise objects by manipulation
  • somatosensory input to the region is intact bu causes a disruption of mental image
  • animal shows deficit in reaching for objects that its going to pick up
28
Q
A