Sociological theory COPY Flashcards
Macrosociology
Macrosociology refers to the study of large-scale social structures and the broad social forces that constrain individuals.
Microsociology
Microsociology focuses on the interactions between individuals and how those interactions are responsible for producing all culture and social systems.
Functionalism
is a macro-level analysis of large social institutions.
This school of thought is also referred to as “structural functionalism.”
Functionalism considers society a system of interrelated parts that function together to create balance and harmony.
Researchers with a functionalist perspective will be interested in studying various social institutions to understand how they function to regulate society and to maintain its stability.
Functionalism 2
Emil D
Émile Durkheim was an early theorist who put forth the idea of “mechanical solidarity”: shared social bonds (e.g., family ties), traditions, and values that solidify a social network. These bonds would ensure social integration of individuals into a traditional society.
In a modern society, “mechanical solidarity” differs from “organic solidarity,” where connections are based on social roles, the division of labor, and work specialization.
Durkheim coined the term “anomie” to refer to social systems where there is breakdown of norms and common values; such a state may lead individuals to feel disconnected from society and its institutions and to feel general purposelessness and emotional despair.
Functionalism 3
The functionalist perspective is analogized to the organismal principle of homeostasis: each of the component parts (organs and tissues) of the society (the organism) performs its roles in service of maintaining a beneficial equilibrium. This concept ties into organic solidarity.
- This equilibrium is important because it allows for members of society to share value systems and expectations of one another.
- Functionalism is a very broad theory that attempts to account for the many complicated social relationships that exist in any society.
- Virtually all sociologists share the functionalist perspective that social institutions feature both overt (intended and explicit, or “manifest”) and covert (unintended and implicit, or “latent”) purposes, as put forth by Robert Merton.
Manifest functions
Manifest functions: clearly stated and broadly recognized outwardly-apparent functions of an institution. For example, schools are understood explicitly to serve an educational function.
Latent Functions
Latent functions: unpredicted, typically unintended, and sometimes unrecognized consequences of the functioning of social institutions. Latent functions may serve to undercut the manifest functions, but may on the other hand, not significantly impact the manifest functions. For example, schools may provide an entertainment (football games and school dances) or child-care role (especially for younger children).
Functionalism 4
- A function that appears manifest to one individual or group may appear latent to another, and vice-versa.
- Example: To upper middle class suburbanites, the manifest function of a police force might be thought of as maintenance of order and protection of the citizenry. To low-income, urban—especially African- American—residents, the manifest function of a police force might be to exert control and occasionally community disruption, with law-and-order/protection functionality representing at best (and only in rare cases) a very latent function. Suburbanites might not even recognize the perspective of the control/ harassment function at all.
Functionalism has been heavily criticized for its conservative bias:
- Because the functionalist perspective assumes that all parts of society fit together smoothly and harmoniously, it automatically assumes that the system is working well.
- Conflict is seen as something negative that disrupts the natural order of the social system.
Conflict theory
Conflict theory is also a macro-level analysis of large social institutions.
Conflict theory is rooted in the work of Karl Marx; it views society as constantly evolving in response to social inequality and the conflict which results from that inequality.
In contrast to functionalists, conflict theorists view the default state of a society as that of change brought about by conflict between dominant and subordinate social groups.
The social order is an agent by which powerful groups are able to ensure that less powerful groups remain subordinate:
- Those groups in positions of power will use social structures to convince, trick, or even force subordinate groups to participate in the existing social system.
- Change results when subordinate groups can no longer be persuaded/deluded to participate in the existing system; thus, they then rebel against the social order.
Conflict theory 2
Conflict theorists are generally concerned with investigating which individuals and social groups benefit from particular social institutions and arrangements:
• The ruling class spreads certain beliefs and values in order to enhance its power and wealth and to maintain its position in society.
Conflict theorists are often criticized for focusing too much on conflict and not considering how society can remain relatively stable for periods of time (the opposite of the criticism leveled at functionalists).
Conflict theorists are also criticized for their attachment to ideology and their inattention to empirical research methods.
Symbolic interactionism
Is a micro-level analysis of social contact between individuals.
While functionalism and conflict theory focus on “big-picture” analysis of social groups and institutions, sociology also recognizes that social interaction exists fundamentally at the level of interactions between individuals.
Symbolic interactionism 2
Symbolic interactionism is a paradigm introduced into sociology by George Mead and is based on Max Weber’s focus on how individuals make sense of and interpret the social world they inhabit.
Interactionism is therefore primarily concerned with the content and significance of person-to-person interactions.
Adherents of this perspective will often criticize functionalists and conflict theorists alike for detaching social structures and institutions from the individual participants who inhabit them and give them life.
Symbolic interactionists argue that most of human social action has a significance to participants beyond the concrete acts that people perform.
Symbolic interactionism 3
Interactionists focus on the meanings that individuals ascribe to their own and to other people’s behaviors.
- They believe that much of people’s social behaviors can be attributed to their interpretation of the various signs and symbols with which various actions are associated.
- Simple actions are viewed as having more complex significations, which are responsible for shaping a participant’s sense of self and their relationship to other individuals.
- Social interaction, therefore, is a collaborative process by which individuals undertake actions laden with symbolic meaning that other individuals interpret and respond to.
The symbolic interactionist perspective is valuable for understanding how social structures and relationships function on the level of interactions between individuals, but it has been understandably criticized for being unable to connect the level of individual interaction with larger social institutions.
Symbolic interactionism complements functionalism and conflict theory by considering how individuals make meaning of their own actions and the actions of others.
Exchange theory 1
Exchange theory is a micro-level theory of individual interactions.
- Another name for exchange theory is rational choice theory.
This theory is predicated on the assumptions that humans are primarily rational beings and that they generally act in their own self-interest to maximize their benefit from any interaction.
This theory considers any individual to be making constant calculations to maximize the benefit of any interaction.
These types of calculations fall under the umbrella of what is called game theory: the study and mathematical modeling of strategic decision making between interacting individuals.
Benefits do not need to take the form of money or even physical objects, but can also be things like time, prestige, status, good will, or the favorable behaviors of others.
Exchange theory 2
Exchange theory can be criticized on several grounds:
- It does not adequately account for altruistic or charitable behavior, which is displayed by many individuals in many societies.
- It supposes a fundamentally rational calculus to human decision making.
For rational choice theory to be correct, individuals must be aware of all of the costs and benefits to a given interaction and weigh the various options appropriately.
However, disciplines such as psychology and the field of behavioral economics (spearheaded by Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky) have shown that people often do not act in their own best interests but rather are affected by various biases that may be the product of social, cultural, and biological influences.