Social Psychology & Law Flashcards
Decision to shoot (Planet, 2011)
Results: Quickest to shoot black men over black women as well as white men and white women.
Masculinity & decision to shoot black suspects (Goff, 2012)
Results: Participants that were more insecure about masculinity were more likely to shoot black suspects relative to white.
Looking deathworthy (Eberhardt, 2006)
- Results (White victims): Stereotypically black defendants received the death penalty much more than less stereotypically black defendants.
- Results (black victims): No significant difference in likelihood of getting the death penalty.
Own-race bias
People are better at recognizing faces of their own race
Weapon focus
Presence of gun impairs eyewitness’s ability to accurately identify a perpetrator’s face
False memory
Recalling events that never occurred or occurred differently.
Misinformation effect
• Happens when witnesses talk to each other
• Witnessing an event
1. receiving misinformation about it
2. incorporating the “misinformation” into one’s memory.
Individual bias in the criminal justice system: Dror & Charlton (2006)
- Changed env. info about the case (not the fingerprint)
* results: 2/3 of experts reversed their decision
Questioning & Misinformation effect (Loftus & Palmer, 1974)
- Framing
* By changing a word, different perceptions on how fast the car was going.
Guilt of suspect
- Trained to suspect guilt
* results: Interrogators that underwent training were less accurate but more confident in their judgements.
What are the 5 steps to securing a confession?
- Control the situation – small room, minimize distractions
- Distort perceptions of the crime – Make it sound worst than what it was or make it sound less serious than what it was
- Sympathize with the suspect – Good cop/bad cop
- Encourage self-doubt – Point out physical symptoms
- Present false evidence of guilt
Psychology of false confessions
- Voluntary
- Coerced-complaint
- Coerced-internalized
Psychology of false confessions: Voluntary
involving no external pressure
Psychology of false confessions: coerced-complaint
person knows they are not guilty, but confess to receive a promised reward (or avoid penalty)
Psychology of false confessions: coerced-internalized
Innocent suspect induced to believe (sometimes temporarily) that he/she is guilty.
Polygraph
- records physiological arousal from multiple channels
* often used as a lie detector test
Voir dire
• pretrial examination of prospective jurors by the judge or opposing lawyers to uncover signs of bias
Peremptory challenge
• means by which lawyers can exclude a limited number of perspective jurors w/o judges approval
Scientific Jury selection
• Selecting juries through surveys that yield demographics & trial relevant attitudes
Death qualification
• jury-selection procedure used in capital cases that permits judges to exclude prospective jurors who say they would not vote for the death penalty
Sentencing disparity
• inconsistency of sentences for the same offense from one judge to another
Adversarial Model
• Dispute-resolution system in which the prosecution & defense present opposing sides of the story
Inquisitorial model
• dispute-resolution system in which neutral investigator gathers evident from both sides & presents findings in court.
Power of innocence (Kassin & Norwick, 2004)
• participants who were truly innocent were significantly more likely than guilty suspects (78%) to sign a waiver of their miranda rights
Defense attorney & plea reccomendations (Edkins, 2010)
• Defense attorneys more likely to recommend longer sentences to black suspects, compared to white suspects.
Torture & Judgements of Guilt (Gray & Weger, 2010)
• Participants rated other students as guiltier in high pain, compared to low pain.
What are some ways to improve eyewitness procedures?
- use double-blind procedures to administer line-ups & sequential line ups
- Changing the situation & false confessions: power of videotape confessions, have entire confession tape can reveal tactics used to get to the confession.
Judges understanding scientific evidence (Kovera & McAuliff, 2000)
• Trained judges were better able to distinguish good vs. bad studies and less likely to admit studies with poor quality.