Social Movements and Panoptic Regulation (FINAL) Flashcards
What are the three theories that seek to explain emergence and/or growth of social movements:
- Relative deprivation theory
- Resource mobilization theory
- Frame alignment theory
Relative deprivation theory argues:
Social rebellion occurs when an intolerable gap develops between social rewards people feel they deserve and social rewards they expect to receive (people with privileges vs people who feel they are not privileged and deserve those rewards)
Relative deprivation theory claims that those who
lead and join social movements are likely to be “outsiders” who lack strong social ties to community
Large body of research has discredited both claims
Why was relative deprivation theory developed?
To explain civil rights and feminist movements
What is not explained by the relative deprivation theory?
Resource mobilization to become successful and why certain movements occur at certain times
Resource-mobilization theory argues:
Social movements emerge only when disadvantaged people are able to gather the means necessary to challenge authority
- More resources = more successful at making claims
Resource-mobilization theory focuses on:
The broad-social structural conditions that facilitate the emergence of social movements
Success or failure of social movements depends largely on availability of
Resources: money, authority/experts, media, celebrities, emotions/ideologies
What does resource-mobilization theory not consider?
Validity of claims
Frame alignment theory stresses:
face-to-face interaction strategies employed by movement members to recruit non-members who are like-minded, apathetic, or even initially opposed to the movements’ goals
Smaller social movements are more successful when they align themselves with other movements/organizations who have similar goals/beliefs
Frame alignment strategies include:
- Reaching out to other organizations thought to contain members sympathetic to movement’s cause
- Elevating importance of positive beliefs about the movement
- Stressing likelihood of the movement’s success
The use of technology has impacted the formation and maintenance of
new social movements. Not as stable as previous social movements
New claims made in new social movements are
global focused, especially about human rights or global citizen. This attracts the majority of the population rather than a select few.
Power-Reflexive Theories: Knowledge is Power
Claims knowledge that emerges from locations of power become legitimized
In a panoptical society, not only do we surveil others, we also
engage in self-surveillance