Social Learning Theory Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Recall who developed Social Learning Theory

A

Albert Bandura in 1977.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

List Bandura’s three experiments

A

1961 - aggression vs non-aggression
1963 - real life vs film aggression
1965 - aggression is rewarded (vicarious reinforcement)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Recall the aim of Bandura’s classic 1961 study

A

AIM: To see whether aggressive behaviour could be acquired through observation of aggressive models

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Describe the procedure of the Bandura’s classic 1961 study

A

MODELLING STAGE - STAGE ONE - APPROXIMATELY 10 MINS
The experimenter led the participant into the first room, where the child was
seated at the table. The model was then escorted to the opposite corner of the room and told that the Tinker toy set, mallet, and Bobo doll were for him or her to play with. The experimenter then left the room.
AGGRESSIVE CONDITION - the model started to play with the Tinkertoy set, but after a minute turned to the Bobo doll and started to act aggressively towards it. The aggressive acts were
deliberately stylised so that imitation of them would be clear and not just examples of how children would play with the Bobo doll. The physically aggressive acts were repeated about
three times in a ten-minute period.
The physically aggressive acts were:
-Laid the Bobo doll on its side, sat on it and punched it on the nose
-Raised the Bobo doll up and hit it on the head with the mallet
-Threw the Bobo doll in the air and kicked it around the room.
The verbally aggressive responses were:
•Sock it to him
•Hit him down
• Pow
• Kick him
The non-aggressive phrases were:
‘He keeps coming back or more*
‘He sure is a tough fella’.
NON- AGGRESSIVE CONDITION -the procedure was the same except that, once seated at the table, the adult assembled the Tinker toys in a quiet, subdued manner and ignored the Bobo doll for the ten minutes that the child was in the room. After ten minutes the experimenter came
to collect the child, saying they were going to another room.
MILD AGGRESSION AROUSAL - STAGE TWO - APPROXIMATLEY TWO MINUTES
Each child including those from the control was then taken into room two. where they were subjected to mild aggression arousal. This room was filled with attractive toys; a jet fighter plane, a cable car, a colourful spinning top, and a doll set complete with wardrobe, doll carriage, and baby crib. The child was allowed to play with them for two minutes. Then the experimenter stopped the child and said: “ these are my very best toys! I don’t just let anyone play with them! I’ve decided to keep them for the other children. But you can play with the toys in the other room”
TEST FOR DELAYED IMITATION - STAGE THREE - APPROXIMATELY 20 MINUTES
Each child, including those from the control group, was taken into room three. This room contained a variety of aggressive toys: a 3-foot bobo doll, a mallet, a peg board, two dart guns and a tether ball with a face painted on it which hung from the ceiling. The non-aggressive toys included a tea set, crayons, colouring set, two dolls, three bears, cars and trucks.
The experimenter stayed with them, as some of the children refused to go into this room on their own or tried to leave before the allotted time. To avoid affecting the children’s behaviour the experimenter worked discreetly at the other end of the room. The child was able to play with the toys and their behaviour was observed for 20 minutes through the one-way mirror.
Two observers scored the subjects behaviour at five second intervals, which gave 240 observations. The children were observed for the following categorjes of behaviour:
• imitative aggression (Physical and verbal)
• partial imitation
•non- imitative aggression

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Recall the results of the 1961 classic study

A

1) Participants in the aggressive condition showed more aggressive behaviour than those in the non-aggressive or control condition.
2) The participants in the non-aggressive condition showed no significant difference in aggressive behaviour to the control group who saw no model.
3) The sex of the model impacted on the participants, children would be more likely to copy a same- sex model than the opposite sex.

4) Boys in particular imitated more
aggressive acts than girls, especially with the same-sex model.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Evaluate the generalisability of Bandura’s 1961 study

A

X The sample may be biased as the participants are not representative of a
target population of children in general.
The children were all from Stanford University nursery. The majority of these children are likely to have been sons/daughters of university academics and so all children are from a middle-class white background.
X Furthermore, the children were all between 3 and 5 years old. Therefore, it could be that this causes cultural bias in the study and lowers the generalisability of the results of this study to a wider population of children.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Evaluate the reliability of Bandura’s 1961 study

A

•The study is regarded to have a high level of reliability as standardised procedures were used for each child making the research easily replicable.
For example, in the aggression arousal stage, the children had exactly the same toys to play with!(model aeroplane, spinning top) and exactly the same phrase was said to all of them: ‘These are
my very best toys!’
•Furthermore, the results of the two observers used to record
the behaviour in the test for delayed imitation were checked for reliability - high inter-rater reliability (0.9; very strong positive correlation) was found.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Evaluate the applications of Bandura’s 1961 study

A

X This study could be said to have limited real-world applications since it was completed in laboratory setting and therefore the study is said to lack ecological validity. This artificial environment may have made the behaviour seen in the children less natural. For example, the bobo doll was an unusual object to the children and the three rooms were all very controlled settings with the same toys and the same events and may not have been a realistic reflection of the children’s natural environment. This in turn has an implication on how useful these research findings are in terms of demonstrating children’s responses to seeing someone behaving aggressively.
✅Nevertheless, the study provoked a great deal of debate on the effects of television on children’s behaviour and aided in the development of policies that effectively censor what children can watch e.g., the 9pm watershed on TV and the certification of movies.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Evaluate the validity of Bandura’s 1961 study

A

✅Bandura’s research has some internal validity as it was carried out in a laboratory setting and had several controls to ensure that extraneous variables did not influence the children’s behaviour. For example, the children’s aggression levels prior to the experiment were controlled by the Ps being matched with a child that had a similar aggression rating. They were then randomly allocated to the three conditions to ensure that any aggressive behaviour seen was not the result of pre-existing aggression in the children. This control and others enabled Bandura to make cause and effect links between the aggression of the models and the behaviour of the children since the main variables were isolated through the controls- thus giving the research findings a high level of validity.
X However, it has been argued that the bobo doll itself threatens the internal validity of this study. This is because it could be that the children believed that they were expected to hit the bobo doll and that the adult model was giving them instructions as to what was expected. These demand characteristics may mean that the behaviour differences seen in the children may not be because of observational learning and therefore validity is lowered.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Evaluate the ethics of Bandura’s 1961 study

A

There are some ethical issues raised by Bandura’s study for not ensuring full ethical consideration for the participants.
X For example, in the study it is not clear how consent was granted for the children to participate in the study and whether the parents knew exactly what would happen to their children.
X It has also been said that the participants were not protected from harm as they were trained to be aggressive and it was not known how long the effects of the study would last (the children were never followed up). In addition, in the second stage of the study - aggression arousal - many of the children became upset when they were not allowed to play with the toys.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the name of the university where Bandura carried out his experiments?

A

Stanford

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Bandura’s experiments were completed throughout the 1960’s; identify two cultural or societal
changes that were occurring at this time which coincided with the growth in studying social psychology.

A

1960s strong societal changes were afoot - the civil rights movement
pocured, the president was shot (Kennedy) and there was a sense of
evelt against norma-social norms;

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Explain how this Bandura (1961) was regarded to be a matched pairs design

A

Participants were matched upon their
aggression levels. These levels were identified by a female experimenter and the children’s nursery school teacher, both of whom knew the children well prior to the study. The children were rated on a five-point aggression scale for displays for physical or verbal aggression towards objects and their ability to control their behaviour.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Recall the aim of Bandura’s 1963 study

A

To test the hypothesis whether the exposure of children to film mediated aggressive models would increase the probability of aggressive behaviour.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Describe the procedure of the Bandura’s 1963 study

A

REAL LIFE AGGRESSION CONDITION- The experimenter led the participant into the first room, where the child was
seated at the table. The model was then escorted to the opposite corner of the room and told that the Tinker toy set, mallet, and Bobo doll were for him or her to play with. The experimenter then left the room.
HUMAN FILM AGGRESSION CONDITION- The experimenter led the participant into a semi-darkened
room and introduced them into the picture materials and informed that while they played with potato prints, a movie would be shown on a screen, positioned approximately 6 feet away from the subject’s table. The colour movie and tape recording of the soundtrack was begun by a male projectionist. The film was shown for 10 minutes. The models in the film were the same adult males and females who participated in the real-life condition of the experiment.
CARTOON FILM AGGRESSION - The experimenters sat the participants at the table with the picture construction material, the experimenter walked over to the television console which was 3 feet awain front of the participants table and remarked, “I’ll guess I’ll turn on the colour TV”,
and turned the cartoon on. The experimenter then left the room. The cartoon was performed by a female model costumed as a black cat similar to the many cartoon cats. The cartoon began with a close up of a stage in which the curtains were slowly drawn revealing a picture of a cartoon cat along with the title, Herman The Cat
The film then showed the cat pommelling the on the head with a mallet. The cat’s verbal aggression was repeated in a high- pitched voice.
TEST FOR DELAYED IMITATION - STAGE THREE - APPROXIMATLEY 20 MINUTES
Each child, including those from the control group was taken into room three. This room contained a variety of aggressive toys: a 3-foot bobo doll, a mallet, a peg board, two dart guns and a tether ball with a face painted on it which hung from the ceiling. The non-aggressive toys included a tea set, crayons, colouring set, two dolls, three bears, cars and trucks.
The experimenter stayed with them, as some of the children refused to go into this room on their own or tried to leave before the allotted time. To avoid affecting the children’s behaviour the experimenter worked discreetly at the other end of the room. The child was able to play with the toys and their behaviour was observed for 20 minutes through the one-way mirror.
Two observers scored the subjects behaviour at five second intervals, which gave 240 observations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

List some of the standardised procedures used in the 1963 study.

A
Inter-rater reliability as two observers
Every experiment followed same routine
Timings of the rooms
Desk measurements
Same toys
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Recall the results of the 1963 study

A

The results indicated that exposure to filmed aggression appears to heighten aggressive reactions in children. Participants who viewed the aggressive and cartoon models on film exhibited nearly twice as much aggression than did subjects in the control group who were not exposed to the aggressive film content.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What did Bandura conclude from his 1963 study?

A
  • From the results Bandura concluded that observing filmed aggressive acts will lead to aggression acts in children. It was not just that watching aggression led to aggression it was that actual observed behaviour was reproduced.
  • This study also made indications that learning was vicarious (Vicarious Learning is learning that is derived from indirect sources such as hearing or observation, rather than direct, hands-on, instruction) as the model exhibiting the behaviour was not punished. The model might not have been directly rewarded either but if the behaviour seemed acceptable to the child, they may have imitated the behaviour because they thought it was fine to do so.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Evaluate the validity of Bandura’s 1963 study

A

Bandura’s research was carried out in a laboratory setting and had a number of controls. In this experiment there was even a control group of participants. This was used to provide Bandura with a baseline measurement to which he could compare the effect of the three conditions. This control and others enabled Bandura to measure the difference between the conditions and meant that a cause and effect link could be established: thus the study had a high level of VALIDITY. This in turn means that this piece of research is regarded to be scientific and provides psychology as a discipline with credibility within the wider scientific community.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Evaluate the reliability of Bandura’s 1963 study

A

Another strength with this research was the RELIABILITY of the measurements that were carried out by the two observers to record the behaviour in the test for delayed imitation. The two observers were trained to a reliable standard. Also, one of these judges was blind to the condition to which the child had been placed and this was used to avoid bias when recording the behaviour. By doing this Bandura was ensuring inter-rater reliability throughout this experiment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Evaluate the application/ ecological validity of Bandura’s 1963 study

A

there were shortcomings with this research. This study could be said to have limited application since it was completed in a laboratory setting with the children seeing reinforced
behaviour through an enactment of aggression on a Bobo doll, or a video of this re-enactment or a cartoon of an aggressive cat. None of the reinforced behaviour was carried out by parents which children would have been more familiar with. Therefore. the research can be said to lack ecological validity.
•Low ecological validity has implications for how applicable these research findings are to a child’s natural responses to seeing someone they know being aggressive.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Evaluate the ethics of Bandura’s 1963 study

A

There are also ETHICAL considerations of the research as the participants were exposed to aggressive reinforcements which may have influenced or changed their behaviour in the long run, therefore it could be thought that the participants were not fully protected from harm.

23
Q

Evaluate the generalisability of Bandura’s 1963 study

A

As the participants were all children from a university sample, the sample may have been biased. The majority of these children will be sons/daughters of university academics and therefore it could be considered that these participants are therefore not representative of a target population of children. This in turn therefore impacts on the GENERALISABILITY of the results of this study.

24
Q

Recall the aim of Bandura’s 1965 study

A

To investigate which reinforcements would influence the performance of a participant when imitating behaviour.

25
Q

Describe the procedure of the Bandura’s 1965 study

A

(1) (Rewarded condition) An adult walked up to him and gave him a soft drink and some sweets, rewarding him for being a “strong champion”.
(2) (Punished condition) An adult shakes his finger at Rocky, calling him a bully. Rocky then falls and the model sits on him and slaps him with a rolled up newspaper. Rocky then runs away.
(3) (No consequence) The same film is shown but he doesn’t receive any consequence at the end.

The child was then taken into another room with a lot of toys (such as a Bobo doll, a mallet, dart guns) For 10 minutes they were observed by 2 experimenters who recorded the child’s behaviour every 5 seconds. They didn’t know which condition they were in.
They looked for some pre-determined behaviours such as: imitative verbal aggression, imitative physical aggression, imitative non-aggressive verbal statements and also acts of non-imitative physical or verbal aggression.

26
Q

Recall the results of the 1965 study

A
  • Boys showed significantly more imitative responses compared to girls.
  • The model rewarded condition showed significantly more imitative responses compared to the model punished condition.
  • There was no significant difference in imitative responses between the model rewarded condition and the no consequences condition.
27
Q

Evaluate the validity of Bandura’s 1965 study

A

Similarly, as in the 1961 and 1963 studies, this piece of research was a controlled laboratory experiment with several controls to ensure that Bandura could see the cause and effect. In this study there was a control group this was used to provide Bandura with a baseline measurement to which he could compare the effect of the three conditions. This control and others enabled Bandura to measure the difference between the conditions and meant that a cause and effect link could be established- thus the study had a high level of VALIDITY. This in turn means that this piece of research is regarded to be scientific and provides psychology as a discipline with credibility within the wider scientific community.

28
Q

Evaluate the reliability of Bandura’s 1965 study

A

this research was the RELIABILITY of the measurements that were
carried out by the two observers also that all the participants went through the same procedure to be tested upon.

29
Q

Evaluate the ecological validity of Bandura’s 1965 study

A

This research was completed in a laboratory setting with the children seeing reinforced behaviour through a video, none of the reinforced behaviour was carried out by parents which children would have been used to. Therefore, the research can be said to lack ecological validity.

30
Q

Evaluate the ethics of Bandura’s 1965 study

A

There are also ETHICAL considerations of the research as the participants were exposed to aggressive reinforcements which may have influenced or changed their behaviour in the long run. Therefore, it could be thought that the participants were not fully protected from harm.

31
Q

Evaluate the generalisability of Bandura’s 1965 study

A

As the participants were all children from a university sample, the sample may have been biased. Most of these children will be sons/daughters of university academics and therefore it could be considered that these participants are therefore not representative of a target population of children. This in turn therefore impacts on the GENERALISIBILITY of the results of this study.

32
Q

Define observational learning

A

The process where learning takes place from watching someone rather than doing something oneself

33
Q

Describe the steps of observational learning

A

1) First the behaviour is modelled by a role mode. A role model may be a parent, peer or a friend, a media personality or any person who is significant in some way.
2) The observer identifies with the role model.
3) The behaviour is observed and noted.
4) The behaviour is imitated and so it is learned. Whether it is repeated again depends on reinforcement and rewards.

34
Q

Define role model

A

Someone significant/ important to an individual, such as a friend, a parent, or someone they look up to, perhaps an athlete.
The individual will identify with the role model in some way, which means they can connect to themselves and see something in them.

35
Q

Define imitation

A

Means copying the behaviours of others

36
Q

Define self efficacy

A

Self efficacy is a when a person
knows their own ability to do
something and is confident that
they will be able to succeed.

37
Q

What are the four cognitive processes in observational learning

A
  • Attention
  • Retention
  • Reproduction
  • Motivation
38
Q

Explain the cognitive process Attention in observational learning

A

When a behaviour is first being modelled, attention is needed by an individual observe what is happening. This can be linked to your cognitive topic of the multi-store memory. This model suggests that only some selected information is focused through the sensory register and then passes through to the short term memory. Factors affecting whether someone attends to a behaviour of others depends on how distinctive or relevant it is for that individual.

39
Q

Explain the cognitive process Retention in observational learning

A

The multi-store model of memory showed how memories are lost (forgotten) if they are not rehearsed and in that way stored in long-term memory. Episodic memories are memories of events and experiences in long term memory and behaviour that is modelled would fall into this category. What is attended to must be retained in memory. This is ‘retention’. Factors affecting retention include using visual imagery perhaps, or coding the behaviour so that it has meaning.

40
Q

Explain the cognitive process Reproduction in observational learning

A

Once the modelled behaviour is in
memory, the behaviour can then be
imitated. However, it will only be reproduced under certain circumstances. These circumstances depend upon the consequences of reproducing the behaviour, which give motivation for doing so. Reproduction is the stage where the modelled behaviour is carried out.

41
Q

Explain the cognitive process Motivation in observational learning

A

Reproduction takes place because of motivation and that depends on the reinforcement for reproducing the behaviour. This is linked to operant conditioning. Rewards motivate behaviour. Behaviour that is rewarded is more likely to be shown. The idea of vicarious learning can link to motivation - if someone is seen to rewarded for their behaviour then the observer might be more motivated to imitate their behaviour than if they were punished for their behaviour. Punishment may demotivate someone.

42
Q

Define vicarious learning

A

Learning that is derived from indirect sources such as hearing or observation rather than hands-on instruction

43
Q

Give an example or vicarious reinforcement

A

Vicarious reinforcement - a person works hard because a colleague has been rewarded for hard work

44
Q

Give an example or vicarious punishment

A

Vicarious punishment - someone does not park in a particular place because he or she has seen someone get a parking ticket there

45
Q

What is vicarious extinction

A

Vicarious extinction - people stop doing something because they have seen that people are not rewarded for doing it.

46
Q

Evaluate evidence for Social Learning Theory

A
There is a great deal of supporting
evidence for this theory from highly
reliable experimental research. The
studies which support the theory are
lab based and were carried out
following standardised procedures
allowing replication.
For example: in Bandura et al's (1961) study, all the children involved went through the same procedure including observing an aggressive model who followed exactly the same script such as always hitting the bobo doll in the face with the mallet.
47
Q

Evaluate methodology for Social Learning Theory

A

The research studies supporting the theory are lab-based experiments which were carried out with a high level of internal validity due to the number of controls that were used.
These scientific procedures mean that cause and effect links are established.
Forexomple: in both his 1961 and 1963 study he ensured that the children taking part in each condition were matched on their personal aggression levels. This meant that this participant variable did not confound the differing measures of aggression he found in the levels of the IV. Therefore, Social Learning Theory is supported by a strong research base which increases it’s credibility as an explanation of human behaviour.

48
Q

Evaluate applications for Social Learning Theory

A

A strength of social learning theory is the application of the theory to real life problems and issues raised by human behaviour. For example, it can explain how humans learn aggressive behaviour and this information can be used to develop therapies/treatments:
For example, modelling therapies, which involve learning alternatives to aggressive behaviours through the observation and imitation of a positive role model. This could be used for children with aggressive behaviors pattern.

49
Q

Evaluate methodology against Social Learning Theory (ecological validity)

A

Ecological validity may be low as much of the research for the theory was experimental and lab based. This means that we cannot be sure that the results gained would be generalised to real life situations, as the behaviour observed may not be natural.
For example: A bobo doll was used as the target for aggression for ethical reasons. Seeing a bobo doll punched is not the same as a child who experiences real life violence/aggression in their homes.

50
Q

Evaluate methodology against Social Learning Theory (generalisability)

A

Generalisability is possibly low as the participants that were used throughout the experiments that underpin the theory were students from Stanford University Nursery, so the chances are
that the sample may be biased.
For example: Most of these children could be sons/daughters of university academics and therefore it could be considered that they are not representative of a target population of
children.
Although these problems with the underpinning research limit Social Learning Theory as an explanation of human behaviour, it should be noted that this theory has been successfully
tested in many other settings and countries.

51
Q

Evaluate Social Learning Theory using Alternatives

A

There are alternative explanations that challenge social learning theory as a full explanation of human behaviour.
E.G. Regarding aggressive behaviour, biological psychology provides some important insights regarding the role of certain brain structures, e.g. the amygdala and the PFC, in aggressive behaviours. Therefore, it overlooks the possibility that behaviour is also influenced by other things e.g. biological factors

52
Q

HOW DOES SOCIAL LEARNING THEORY EXPLAIN THE ACQUISITION OF PHOBIAS?

A

ACQUISITION - From the social learning theory Bandura proposes that children learn to imitate behaviour through the process of observation, modelling and imitating. The social learning theory can be applied to explain that if someone observes a role model showing fear in a certain situation or when faced with a certain object, then the person watching can learn that phobia. For example, if a child observes an older sibling respond to the finding a spider in their room in a fear reaction the child may see the older sibling as a role model and would later imitate this phobia when they themselves encounter a spider.

53
Q

HOW DOES SOCIAL LEARNING THEORY EXPLAIN THE MAINTENANCE OF PHOBIAS?

A

MAINTENANCE - If someone else is modelling the phobia, social learning would explain how a phobia is maintained. For example,
Observation - a child watches an older sibling respond to finding a spider in their bed.
Vicarious reinforcement - the parents might well then try to make the older sibling feel better by comforting them.
Imitation- sometime later the observing child finds a spider in their bed. They repeat the behaviour they had witnessed earlier.
Reinforcement - the observed child’s parents provide comfort- and while it might console the child it reinforces it.