Social Exchange Theory Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is the key statement of this theory

A

That people constantly haggle and negotiate in relationships for the best deal and that we form and maintain relationships because the rewards outweigh the costs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the four key terms

A

Reward
Cost
Outcome
Comparison

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the rewards of a relationship

A

Companionship, social support, money and fun

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the costs of a relationship

A

Long distance, annoying habits, effort, time and missed potential partners

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How does a person know if they are in a good relationship

A

They judge their relationship against a comparison level which they form based off of past relationships and experiences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Who proposed that everyone has a individual comparison level

A

Thibaut and Kelley in 1959

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the comparison linked to

A

Self esteem

A high self esteem will influence your comparison to be high

A low self esteem will influence your comparison level to be high

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is a example of a factor that may influence your comparison level

A

If your parents were violent with each other then you may see violence as more acceptable in a relationship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the alternative comparison level

A

Everyone has a alternative comparison level which is the amount of rewards and costs they’re likely to obtain in a new relationship.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What did thibaut and kelley say we do even when in a relationship

A

We look to society to check out alternatives

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the three comparisons of happy relationships

A

CL>ACL happy relationship

CL=ACL less stable but not unhappy

ACL>CL unhappy relationship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the four stages in SET

A

Sampling stage

Bargaining stage

Commitment stage

Institutionalisation stage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the sampling stage

A

Exploration of potential rewards and costs by experience or observation of others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the bargaining stage

A

First stage in a romantic relationship where partners exchange rewards and costs to figure out the most profitable exchanges and negotiates the dynamics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the commitment stage

A

Becomes more stable and partners become familiar with the rewards and costs and expectations so rewards increase and costs lessen while attraction increases

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the institutionalisation stage

A

When costs and rewards are firmly established

17
Q

What evidence is there

A

Floyd et al in 1994 found that commitment develops when couples are satisfied and feel rewarded by the relationship

Sprecher in 2001 found that comparison levels for alternatives were a strong predictor of satisfaction especially with women

18
Q

What are the strengths

A

It is supported my studies such as Sprecher and Floyd et al which concluded that some people base their evaluation of relationships on rewards and costs

The theory has real life applications such as integrated behavioural couples therapy where partners are trained to increase rewards they give the other and reduce the costs

19
Q

What are the weaknesses

A

Research evidence is limited

Much of the available evidence is not true to how romantic relationships are in the real world as they are based upon procedures involving game based scenarios with rewards and costs

The concepts are difficult define such as how to operationalise commitment and if they are difficult to define they are difficult to measure making them unscientific

Theory assumes that partners keep a list of scores and rewards which is unrealistic

Other research shows that it is not based on rewards and costs rather it is based on fairness (Clark and Mills in 2011)