Small Group Flashcards
(32 cards)
What are Tuckman’s Phases
Forming- Introductions/getting to know
Storming-finding vital information
Norming- Resolving Problems, creating structure
Preforming-Accomplishing tasks
“Bales Equilibrium problem vs. Blake Mouton
Bales Equilibrium Problem- Groups will swing back and forth between task and maintenance crisis. A groups will develop strategies to manage balance.
Blake Mouton- Managerial grid that uses production (output) and People (Maintenance)
So Bales would say that conflict between task and maintenance demands to prevent an ideal group while Blake and Mouton says an ideal leader can perform both well.
What is Chaos Theory
-Chaos is nessecarry and good for groups
Process
1.) Hanging on to old habits
2.) working through problems
3.) Letting go
4) New and improved person
Might experience regressive pull (ability to go back to bad habits)
Additive/Productivity
-Everyone does the same task (addressing envelopes)
Problem-Social loafing: one lazy member
Conjunctive/Coordination
Assembly Line- Each person focuses on one specific task.
Problem- Weak link: someone is not being efficient or doing their job
disjunctive/single stage accuracy tasks
-Committee work: problem solving, decision making, judgements
-Competent people must speak up so they can prevail
Complementary/ multiple stage accuracy tasks
- Everyone does different jobs which might not be simultaneously to achieve overall goal (dinner party)
-People need to be assigned to the right task
What is social loafing
When members do not preform to their full potential in completing tasks which causes other member to have to work harder
Talkativeness
-Just because someone is talkative does not mean they will be a good leader.
-Group size will not impact someone who is talkative.
Depersonalized vs personalized conflict
Depersonalized conflict- debating about the idea rather than attacking the character of the person
Personalized conflict- Involves other emotions or relationships when you are discussing issues
Biztenstine & Terhune competition vs. cooperation studies
Nepos- will usually compete
Nachs- will be more corporative
Naffs- will be indecisive
When players view competition as the objective all players will compete.
What are Brechner’s social traps?
- Limited Amount of Resources will cause conflict since they have to get along the best they can
Toughness Studies
Being tough is the best bet for a negotiator but can also lower odds of reaching an agreement therefore making it unattractive for someone with a lot to lose.
What are the Asch Studies
Peer Pressure
- No one wants to be the odd one out
-More group members the higher likely hood to be peer pressured
What are the Sherif Studies
When asked in group settings answers will be more alike than when asked in individual settings. Therefore group norms and standing out will impact our answers.
What are the Hollander studies
Power of loyalty
- Cheerleader for everything in group to build others confidence in you
-groups might agree with this person to be loyal
-cheerleader might have wrong answer instead of playing the testing game
What are the Johnston & Trovica studies
Administered tests then had different scores take tests together
-low scores paired with others made scores worse since they would challenge correct answers
-mediums and highs helped each other fill in unknowns therefore increasing scores
What are the Laughlin & Johnston studies?
When you put people where they can succeed then you will have good outcomes. When they are put in places they want to be and own’t succeed then outcomes might be more difficult.
What is conformity
Member chooses the majority decision that is acceptable rather than having consensus
What is deviance
A member chooses an action that is not sociablly acceptable and majority does not accept it
What is compliance
When a member decision is based on doing what they thing the group want them to do
What is private acceptance
When you truly believe that the correct decision was made
Moscovici on minority influence
Possibility of being heard increases when you have a friend
cooperative argumentation
-Debate or discussion should not have a winner or a loser
-seeks to better understand both side of an argument