slides that could be relevant 6 Flashcards
compensatory vs non compensatory models
Compensatory: weak performance on one dimension can be offset by strong performance on another dimension
compensatory: weak performance on one dimension cannot be offset by strong performance on other dimensions
lexicographic strategy
compare on most important dimensions
If tie compare on second most important dimensions
elminiation by aspect strategy
Eliminate brands that do not meet cutoff on most important dimensions
eliminate brands that do not meet cutoff on 2 most important dimension
continue until one brand remains
disjunctive model strategy
Compare by brand
set up acceptable cutoff for each attribute (level that is most desirable)
Keep brands that meet cutoff on ALL attributes
multi-attribute model
Compare by brand
For each attribute multipy evaluation with importance weight and sum all attributes
Choose brand with highest sum
Additive difference model system
Compare by attribute
For two brands, compute difference-score in evaluations, then sum difference score (optional: after weighing by importance weight)
Superior brand stays “in the race”
sticking with default (heuristic 1)
Especially when choices are difficult, people do not like to make a choice
–> stick with the default (keep preselected option)
doing nothing feels good = no thinking, no stress
Relate to the status quo bias: we like to keep things as they are
Heuristic 2 variety seeking
Sometimes consumers buy one item at a time, just before each consumption situation
other times consumers buy several items on one shopping tirp and consume the items over several consumption occasions
Heuristic 3 availability heuristic
people are influenced by the ease of information retrieval
Heuristic 4 anchoring and adjustment
People are influenced by reference points
when people make estimates they tend to start from an initial value and then adjust it
Heuristic 5 endowment effect
People ascribe more value to things merely because they own them.
asymmetric dominance
when two products are great at one thing and suck at the other but inversed
the phenomenon whereby consumers will tend to have a specific change in preference between two options when also presented with a third option that is asymmetrically dominated.