SESSION 6 - Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system Flashcards
1
Q
Whats the paper about?
A
- most common failure when implementing enterprise systems: firms rush to install ES without having understand of business implications logic of system may conflict with logic of business
–> consequence: 1) implementation fails = wasting money + causing disruption 2) system weakens important sources of competitive advantage = gobbling the firm
2
Q
Whats the problem that enterprise systems solve?
A
- problem enterprise systems solve: fragmentation of information in large business orgas
- having a fragmentation of information implies direct (storing and rationalising, rekeying data etc) & indirect (suffering of productivity and customer responsiveness; decisions based on instinct rather than detailed understanding) costs
–> when firm systems are fragmented = business is fragmented - ES thus steamline firm’s data flows and gives access to real-time operating information
–> gains in productivity & speed
3
Q
What about the weightoff between system and strategy?
A
- most firms need to adapt their business to system, not other way around
- firms competing on product might be careful with ES implementation to still be able to differentiate themselves
–> risk that generic enterprise system could dissolve sources of advantage - firms competing on cost rather than product/service may decide not to implement ES at all
–> implies huge investment that must be weighed against eventual savings that system produces
4
Q
What about flexibility vs hierarchy?
A
- one impact: real-time access to data allows firms to streamline management structures = creating flatter, more flexible, more democratic structures
- other impact: centralisation of control over info and standardisation of processes are characteristics more conform with command-and-control, hierarchical, uniform structures = discipline
–> organisation can use ES systems with both goals in mind, depends on execution
5
Q
How should MNE’s deal with enterprise systems?
A
- international firms can introduce more consistent operating practices across geographically dispersed units + rapid shifts in functions due to changing demand/supply
- minimization of excess manufacturing capacity to reduce both component & finished-good inventory
- when markets are too different: firms need to have different versions (tailored) of same system in each regional unit to support local operating practices
–> challenge: where common/where different
6
Q
Whats the role of management when implementing ES?
A
- firms with biggest problems when installing ES: those that haven’t thought through its full business implications
- speedy implementation is wise - rash implementation not = needs careful deliberation
- management needs to be directly involved in planning and implementing in ES; cannot push responsibility down to technology department
–> only manager is equipped to act as mediator between imperatives of technology and imperatives of business