Section 3 Quiz Flashcards
In what situation would it be appropriate for the architect to terminate the contract?
It would be appropriate for the architect to terminate the contract if the owner puts the project on hold indefinitely.
Reference: (AIA B101-2017, Article 9.5)
When might it be appropriate for an architect to terminate the contract due to issues with the owner’s payments?
If the owner is consistently late in providing payments, the architect may terminate the contract, provided proper notice is given.
Reference: (AIA B101-2017, Article 9.7)
Why is a workplace environment suitable for applying evidence-based design principles?
A workplace can benefit from evidence-based design to analyze and enhance factors such as wellness, employee retention, and productivity, supporting data-driven architectural decisions.
Reference: (Evidence-Based Design Principles, Workplace Applications)
Why is a retail environment suitable for applying evidence-based design principles?
Retail environments are ideal for evidence-based design as architectural and design changes can be tracked over time against sales and market data, providing insights for further modifications and future design decisions.
Reference: (Evidence-Based Design Principles, Retail Applications)
Why is a healthcare environment suitable for applying evidence-based design principles?
Healthcare environments are well-suited for evidence-based design as extensive data points related to occupant wellbeing are collected, which can inform and enhance the design process.
Reference: (Evidence-Based Design Principles, Healthcare Applications)
Why is an educational environment suitable for applying evidence-based design principles?
Educational environments are ideal for evidence-based design because quantitative data such as grades, attendance, and test scores can be tracked over time to assess and enhance the effectiveness of the learning environment.
Reference: (Evidence-Based Design Principles, Educational Applications)
Why are residential environments generally not suitable for applying evidence-based design principles?
Residential environments are less suited for evidence-based design because they are unique to individual occupants, and the data points vary widely, making it challenging to collect consistent data for design improvements.
Reference: (Evidence-Based Design Limitations in Residential Architecture)
Why are laboratory environments generally not suitable for applying evidence-based design principles?
Laboratory environments are typically designed under strict regulations, and relevant data is often not released for public analysis, which limits the application of evidence-based design principles.
Reference: (Challenges in Applying Evidence-Based Design in Laboratory Environments)
Which terms of consultant compensation are typically included in the standard (unmodified) architect/consultant agreement as outlined in AIA C401-2017?
Payment promptly after the architect receives payment from the owner
Payment in proportion to the amounts received from the owner
Payment in accordance with the compensation provisions of the owner/architect agreement
Reference: AIA C401-2017, Articles 4.1, 4.2, and 4.3
Is payment of reimbursable expenses as a percentage of the consultant’s fee a standard term in the architect/consultant agreement?
Incorrect. AIA C401-2017 states that payments for reimbursable expenses are those incurred by the consultant directly related to the project. These expenses may be marked up by an agreed-upon percentage, but they are not paid as a percentage of the overall consultant fee.
Is payment of reimbursable expenses at the end of the project a standard term in the architect/consultant agreement?
Incorrect. Reimbursable expenses that are invoiced throughout the course of the project should be paid in the same manner as invoices for services rendered, not at the end of the project.
Is payment of additional services at the end of the project a standard term in the architect/consultant agreement?
Incorrect. Additional services that are invoiced throughout the course of the project should be paid in the same manner as invoices for services rendered, not at the end of the project.
Which project delivery method is most effective for mitigating both cost overruns and project risk?
Design-bid-build.
This method is effective for mitigating both cost and risk. Cost overruns are reduced because the project is competitively bid, ensuring the contractor is hired for the lowest possible cost. Risk is mitigated due to the method’s long-standing use and established case law.
Why is Design-build (bridging) not the best project delivery method for a client focused on mitigating cost and risk?
Design-build (bridging) is effective for mitigating risk but does not prioritize quality, which is not the client’s main concern. While it can help manage risk, cost may not be as tightly controlled as in other methods like Design-bid-build.
Why is the Negotiated select team method not ideal for a client focused on cost and risk?
The Negotiated select team method allows the owner and architect to choose contractors based on quality, but it does not guarantee the most competitive cost due to the absence of bidding, which can leave costs higher than in methods like Design-bid-build.
Why is the Construction Manager as Adviser method not ideal for a client focused primarily on cost and risk?
While the Construction Manager as Adviser method addresses risk, it focuses more on quality, which was not the client’s primary concern for the project. It does not prioritize cost competitiveness, making it less suitable for the client’s main objectives.
Which project delivery method will allow the client to have a reliable cost established before design is complete?
Design-build (bridging)
Design-build (bridging) allows the client to establish a reliable cost before the design is complete, as the contractor is involved early in the process and can provide a more accurate cost estimate based on preliminary designs.
Why is Construction Manager as Agent (CM-A) not the best option for providing the client with a reliable cost estimate before design is complete?
CM-A is not the best option because, while it can provide cost guidance during the design phases, the final, reliable cost estimate cannot be established until a contractor is chosen, leaving the client without a guaranteed price until later in the process.
Why is the Cost Plus Fixed Fee method not suitable for providing a reliable cost estimate before design is complete?
In a cost plus fixed fee arrangement, while costs can be estimated throughout the project, the final cost isn’t known until the project is complete. This is because materials and labor are purchased throughout the project’s duration, and costs can vary from the initial estimates.
Reference: AIA B101-2017 (Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Architect)
Why is Design-Bid-Build not suitable for providing a reliable cost estimate before design is complete?
In a design-bid-build project, the cost of the project is determined at bidding, when contractors establish their bid pricing based on the completed construction documents. This means the cost is only established after design completion.
Reference: AIA B101-2017 (Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Architect)
What benefits might a startup firm experience by offering design-build and construction management services? (Check the three that apply.)
Additional streams of revenue: Diversifying the firm’s services will provide additional revenue and greater stability.
Collaboration with different kinds of designers: Entering into different market sectors will allow the firm to expand its network and collaborate with a variety of designers.
The ability to deliver more holistic solutions to clients: Offering more services, such as design-build, gives the architect greater control over the entire process.