Section 1, Chapter 4 (part 2) Flashcards
How should pollution remediation liabilities be measured?
Based on the outlays expected to be incurred to settle the liabilities
Profits and risk premiums that another party would demand to perform. The work should be included in the measurement of the government liability, if the government expects to utilize another party to perform the work.
How should pollution remediation liabilities be valued?
At their current value
Because settlement of liability is not always possible in the current period, settlements can involve future events. The current value of a remediation liability should be based on reasonable, and supportable, assumptions about future events that affect the eventual settlement of the liability.
What technique should be used to measure pollution remediation liabilities?
They should be measured using the expected, cash flow technique which measures the liability as the sum of probability weighted amounts in a range of possible estimated amounts
Under the expected cash flow technique, what should the measurement of a government pollution remediation include?
All remediation work that the government is expected to perform, including work expected to be performed for other responsible parties, whether or not the government is required to do that work.
What should be done for expected recoveries from those other parties, and expected insurance recoveries from policies that indemnify the government for its pollution remediation obligations?
They should also be included in the measurement by reducing the expense, and if not yet realizable, the liability
If a recovery is realizable, it should be recorded as an asset, and an increase of the liability, similar to a prepaid construction contract
In governmental funds, what happens to estimated recoveries?
They reduce any associated pollution remediation expenditures when the recoveries are available
When should pollution remediation outlays, including outlays for property, plant, and equipment be reported as an expense?
When a liability is recognized (exceptions, apply)
When should pollution remediation outlays, including outlays for PPE, be reported as an expense?
When a liability is recognized (exceptions, apply)
Pollution remediation outlays should be capitalized when goods and services are acquired, if attained under what circumstances?
- To prepare property in anticipation of a sale.
- To prepare property for use when the property was acquired with known or suspected pollution that was expected to be remediated.
- To perform pollution remediation that restores a pollution caused decline in service utility that was recognized as an asset impairment
- To acquire PPE that has a future alternative use.
When should governments capitalize property in anticipation of a sale?
Only those amounts that would result in a carrying amount of the property, not exceeding an estimated fair value upon completion of remediation
When should governments capitalize property for use when the property was acquired with known or suspected pollution that was expected to be remediated?
Government should only capitalize those outlays expected to be necessary to place the asset in its intended location and condition for use, which may not include costs overruns
For government wide and proprietary fund statements, where should pollution remediation costs (and revenues) be reported?
In the statement of activities and the statement of revenues, expenses, and changes in net position as a program or operating expense (revenue), special item, or extraordinary item
How should pollution remediation liabilities be reported in government fund statements?
Liabilities are not reported
Rather, payables for goods and services used for pollution, remediation activities are recognized as liabilities upon receipt of those goods and services. In the statement of revenues, expenditures and changes and fund balances, any facilities and equipment acquisitions for pollution remediation activities should be reported as expenditures.
What should governments disclose for recognized pollution remediation liabilities and recoveries?
- The nature and source of pollution remediation obligations
- The amount of the estimated liability
- Estimated recoveries reducing the liability
What should governments disclose for pollution, remediation liabilities that are not yet recognized because they are not reasonably estimable?
Governments should disclose general description of the nature of the pollution remediation activities
Why is the cost measurement of closure and post closure landfills complex?
- most of the cost will not be actually paid until 20 to 50 years in the future
- Timing makes it difficult to measure not only the inflation, but the impact of potential future regulations and changes in waste disposal technologies
When does GAP require estimated closure and post closure cost to be recognized?
While the landfill is operating, regardless of when cash disbursements are made
Accordingly, a portion of the estimated total cost of closure and post closure should be recognized as an expenditure/expense, and as a liability in each period the landfill accepts solid waste
Recognition should begin on the date the landfill begins accepting solid waste and continue in each period it accepts waste, such as the total estimated costs will be fully recognized by the time the landfill stops accepting waste
What is the closure and post closure cost formula for recognition?
(estimated total current cost X cumulative capacity used) divided by total estimated capacity less amounts previously recognized
What does the estimated total current cost of closure and post closure care include?
A mixture of costs for monitoring, maintenance, and capital expenditures/expenses
Is there a distinction between operating or capital components of the closure and post closure costs of landfills?
No
Because all cost related to landfill closure, including future capital acquisitions, were recorded as expenses as the landfill was being filled, the capital components are not reported as assets acquired, nor are they reported as capital expenditures. Once the costs have been associated with closure or post closure care, they lose the distinction between operating and capital.
How should governmental funds report amounts to be liquidated with expendable available financial resources?
As fund liabilities
If expenditures have exceeded the accumulated liability, the prepaid amount is reported in the governmental fund
What are asset retirement obligations (AROs) recognized for?
They are recognized for the retirement of a tangible capital asset or disposal of tangible capital asset, or environmental remediation associated with the retirement of a tangible capital asset, resulting from the normal operation of that capital asset, whether constructed or acquired
When is liability recognized for asset retirement obligations (ARO)?
Only when there are external and internal obligating events
What do external obligating events include?
Federal, state, or local laws or regulations, creation of illegally binding contract, or issuance of a court judgment
What do internal obligating events include?
Occurrence of contamination because of normal operations, as in nuclear plants
What is the recognition based on for non-contamination related AROs?
The usage of the asset or abandonment
If there are no external or internal obligating events, ARO is not recognized
What is required in order to be considered a combination?
The arrangement should result in the continuation of substantial portion of services, provided by the previously separate entities, or their operations after the transaction has occurred