SCLOA - Discuss the use of compliance techniques Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Compliance

A
  • a form of social influence

- involves intellectual and emotional submission in reaction to a general request

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

compliance techniques

A
  • lowballing

- foot in the door (FITD)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

FITD

A
  • making a small request to increase compliance
  • then later follow up with a larger request

Main study: Freedman and Fraser (1966)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Freedman and Fraser (1966) - procedure

A
  1. 2 conditions:
    - FITD 1 (same topics)
    - FITD 2 (different topics)
    - control (proceeded directly to larger request)

FitD 1: Homeowners were requested to display a small ‘drive safely’ sign, then 2 weeks later asked to display a bigger sign
FitD 2: households were asked to sign a petition to “keep California beautiful”, then 2 weeks later were asked to display a big ‘Drive Safely’ sign

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Freedman and Fraser (1966) - findings and conclusion

A
  • control: only 17% compliance
  • FitD 1: nearly full compliance with small request, and 76% compliance in actual request
  • FitD 2: almost 50% compliance with actual request (despite the completely diff topics)
  • signing the petition/putting up the small sign changed the homeowners’ views of themselves
  • they began to think of themselves as unselfish citizens with civic principles
  • their compliance with the bigger request was due to a need to comply with this new image
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

why does FitD work?

A

Cialdini (2009):

- due to our need to be consistent and show commitment to our previous acts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

necessary precautions taken in FitD

A

Burger (1999):

  • must have time delay between first and second request
  • first request must not be so unreasonable that most people will refuse them

Chartrand et al. (1999): if the same person makes both requests, the likelihood of refusal is higher

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

evaluation of FitD

A
  • takes advantage of people’s need to stay consistent to commitments
  • people generally agree more if the second request is similar in topic to the first (in line with commitment)
  • FitD is most powerful when self-image is related to the request
  • particularly helpful to those trying to solicit donations of time, money, effort, and even body parts
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Lowballing

A
  • involves changing an offer to make it less attractive to the target person
  • only after target person has agreed to it

Main studies: Burger and Cornelius (2003)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Burger and Cornelius (2003) - Procedure

A
  1. Students were contacted by a caller to donate $5 to a scholarship fund for underprivileged students
  2. 3 conditions:
    - control: students were simply asked to donate
    - interrupt: students were told that contributors would get a free smoothie coupon but caller mentioned there were no coupons left before students answered
    - lowball: students were told that contributors would get a free smoothie coupon, but upon agreeing, were informed that there were no more coupons
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Burger and Cornelius (2003) - Findings and Conclusion

A
  • control: 42% compliance
  • interrupt: 16% compliance
  • lowball: 77.6% compliance
  • shows that lowballing works because of commitment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

why does lowballing work?

A

Cialdini (2009): when people make public commitments; new self image increases resolve to commit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

effectiveness of FitD vs Lowballing

A

Hornik et al. (1990):

  • compared the effectiveness of the FITD technique and lowballing in increasing the response rate of random people to interviews on public health issues
  • lowballing was significantly more effective in inducing compliance
  • but a technique combining both the FITD and the lowballing techniques emerged as even more effective than either applied alone
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

examine

A
  • hardcore ver of “analysis”
  • give detailed information that reveals underlying assumptions or the interaction of various factors
  • make judgments supported by evidence
  • discuss the relative importance of different factors to the basic term/concept under consideration
  • give a detailed description accompanied by a clear, thorough, and organized reflection of the matter

when examining each technique:
• distinguish the components of each technique and discuss how they relate to one another
- discuss principles underlying the technique and specific research methods influences data collection

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly